To Örebro University

Strenuous exercise can result in disruption of intestinal barrier function and occurrence of gastrointestinal symptoms. The aim of this exploratory study was to elucidate systemic effects of increased intestinal permeability after high-intensity exercise. Forty-one endurance-trained subjects performed a 60-min treadmill run at 80% VO2max. Small intestinal permeability was measured as urinary excretion ratio of lactulose/rhamnose (L/R). Blood, saliva and feces were analyzed for gut barrier and immune-related biomarkers. The exercise challenge increased several markers of intestinal barrier disruption, immune function and oxidative stress. We found a negative correlation between L/R ratio and uric acid (r = -0.480), as well as a positive correlation between the L/R ratio and fecal chromogranin A in male participants (r = 0.555). No significant correlations were found between any of the markers and gastrointestinal symptoms, however, perceived exertion correlated with the combination of IL-6, IL-10 and salivary cortisol (r = 0.492). The lack of correlation between intestinal permeability and gastrointestinal symptoms could be due to minor symptoms experienced in lab settings compared to real-life competitions. The correlation between L/R ratio and uric acid might imply a barrier-protective effect of uric acid, and inflammatory processes due to strenuous exercise seem to play an important role regarding physical exhaustion.

The rapidly evolving landscape of biomarkers for colorectal cancer (CRC) necessitates an integrative, updated repository. In response, we constructed the Colorectal Cancer Biomarker Database (CBD), which collected and displayed the curated biomedicine information for 870 CRC biomarkers in the previous study. Building on CBD, we have now developed CBD2, which includes information on 1569 newly reported biomarkers derived from different biological sources (DNA, RNA, protein, and others) and clinical applications (diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis). CBD2 also incorporates information on nonbiomarkers that have been identified as unsuitable for use as biomarkers in CRC. A key new feature of CBD2 is its network analysis function, by which users can investigate the visible and topological network between biomarkers and identify their relevant pathways. CBD2 also allows users to query a series of chemicals, drug combinations, or multiple targets, to enable multidrug, multitarget, multipathway analyses, toward facilitating the design of polypharmacological treatments for CRC. CBD2 is freely available at http://www.eyeseeworld.com/cbd.

BACKGROUND: Recent genetic and transcriptomic data highlight the need for improved molecular characterisation of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Proteomics may advance the delineation of IBD phenotypes since it accounts for post-transcriptional modifications. AIM: We aimed to assess the IBD spectrum based on inflammatory serum proteins and identify discriminative patterns of underlying biological subtypes across multiple European cohorts.

METHODS: Using proximity extension methodology, we measured 86 inflammation-related serum proteins in 1551 IBD patients and 312 healthy controls (HC). We screened for proteins exhibiting significantly different levels among IBD subtypes and between IBD and HC. Classification models for differentiating between Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) were employed to explore the IBD spectrum based on estimated probability scores.

RESULTS: Levels of multiple proteins, such as IL-17A, MMP-10, and FGF-19, differed (fold-change>1.2; FDR<0.05) between ileal vs colonic IBD. Using multivariable models, a protein signature reflecting the IBD spectrum was identified, positioning colonic CD between UC and ileal CD, which were at opposite ends of the spectrum. Based on area under the curve (AUC) estimates, classification models more accurately differentiated UC from ileal CD (median AUCs>0.73) than colonic CD (median AUCs<0.62). Models differentiating colonic CD from ileal CD demonstrated intermediate performance (median AUCs 0.67-0.69).

CONCLUSION: Our findings in serum proteins support the presence of a continuous IBD spectrum rather than a clear separation of CD and UC. Within the spectrum, disease location may reflect a more similar disease than CD vs UC, as colonic CD resembled UC more closely than ileal CD.

This study presents a comprehensive chemical and toxicological screening of chemicals extracted from WEEE (waste from electrical and electronic equipment) plastics. Chemical identification was conducted through suspect and target screening methods, revealing a diverse array of hazardous compounds including polycyclic aromatic compounds (PACs), organophosphate flame retardants (OPFRs), phthalates, benzotriazoles, and others. Toxicological endpoints included cell morphological phenotypes, inflammatory response, aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) activation, activation of estrogenic receptor, and anti-androgenic activity. Results demonstrated that WEEE plastic chemicals significantly altered cell morphological phenotypes, particularly affecting the cytoskeleton, endoplasmic reticulum (ER), and mitochondrial measures. Moreover, WEEE chemicals induced inflammatory responses in resting human macrophages and altered ongoing inflammatory responses in lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-primed macrophages. Furthermore, WEEE chemicals exhibited potent AhR agonistic activity, activated estrogen receptor-α (ERα), and inhibited androgen receptor (AR) activation. The findings suggest that WEEE plastic chemicals exert their effects through multiple modes of action, targeting various subcellular sites. Thus, a combined approach utilizing non-target and target screening tools is essential for comprehensively assessing the toxic effects and health hazards associated with WEEE plastic chemicals.

Background: Mental health (MH) has been reported to be poorer among patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) than general population. However, it is not known whether MH is more driven by inflammation itself or related to gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms. Also, the dynamics of MH following IBD diagnosis is not well understood.

Methods: In the Swedish Inception Cohort of IBD (SIC-IBD), patients with Crohn’s disease (CD), ulcerative colitis (UC) and unclassified IBD (IBD-U) as well as symptomatic controls (SC) and healthy controls (HC) filled in Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), a validated screening tool for depression. Patients completed PHQ-9 at diagnosis and at one year follow-up while the controls completed it once. Disease outcome was defined at one year based on requirement of advanced treatments/ surgery.

Results: In total, 286 individuals (16 HC, 89 SC, 62 CD, 104 UC, 15 IBD-U) completed the questionnaire at baseline. HC had significantly lower PHQ-9 score, (fewer depressive symptoms), at baseline compared to all the other groups (p<0.01). The baseline PHQ-9 score was not significantly different between SC and CD, UC and IBD-U patients (p=0.06).

At one year follow-up, 38 CD and 53 UC patients completed the PHQ-9. Between baseline and follow-up, UC patients had a significant drop in their PHQ-9 score (p<0.0000001), whereas CD patients did not have any significant change in their PHQ-9 score (p=0.06). Furthermore, UC patients had significantly lower PHQ-9 score compared with CD patients at follow-up (p=0.04, Figure 1).

Baseline PHQ-9 score was not correlated with calprotectin at baseline neither in UC nor CD patients (p=0.7 and 0.5 respectively). Also, there was no positive correlation between PHQ-9 score change and calprotectin change in either UC or CD patients, and neither baseline nor follow-up PHQ-9 scores were significantly different in patients with poor or good outcome (p>0.05). When analysed separately by sex, there was still no correlation between baseline PHQ-9 score and outcome in neither CD nor UC patients (p>0.05)

Conclusion: IBD patients have at the time of diagnosis more depressive symptoms than HC, but not different from SC. Depressive symptoms are more related to GI symptoms than IBD specific inflammation or disease outcome. UC patients show more of an improvement in their depressive symptoms one year after diagnosis than CD patients.

Background: Faecal biomarkers can be used to assess inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).

Aim: To explore the performance of some promising biomarkers in diagnosing and predicting disease course in IBD.

Methods: We included 65 patients with treatment-na & iuml;ve, new-onset Crohn's disease (CD), 90 with ulcerative colitis (UC), 67 symptomatic controls (SC) and 41 healthy controls (HC) in this prospective observational study. We analysed faecal samples for calprotectin (FC), myeloperoxidase (MPO), human neutrophil lipocalin (HNL), eosinophil cationic protein ECP and eosinophil-derived neurotoxin (EDN) and compared markers among groups. We assessed the diagnostic capability of biomarkers with receiver operating characteristic curves. Clinical disease course was determined for each patient with IBD and analysed the association with biomarkers by logistic regression.

Results: All markers were elevated at inclusion in patients with IBD compared with HC (p < 0.001) and SC (p < 0.001). FC (AUC 0.85, 95% CI: 0.79-0.89) and MPO (AUC 0.85, 95% CI: 0.80-0.89) showed the highest diagnostic accuracy in distinguishing IBD from SC. The diagnostic ability of biomarkers differed between IBD subtypes with the highest performance for FC and MPO in CD. The diagnostic accuracy was further improved by combining FC and MPO (p = 0.02). Levels of FC, MPO and HNL at inclusion were predictive of an aggressive disease course with MPO showing the strongest association (p = 0.006).

Conclusions: This study provides new insight into the diagnostic and prognostic capability of neutrophil and eosinophil biomarkers in IBD and suggests that MPO, alone or in combination with FC, may add to the diagnostic power of faecal biomarkers.

The appropriateness of the fecal microbiota to adequately reflect the gut microbiota composition from more difficult to access luminal content at different colonic locations has been debated. Here, in a healthy population, luminal samples were collected from terminal ileum to rectum using an unique sampling technique without the need of prior bowel cleansing/preparation. Rectal swabs were collected immediately prior colonoscopy by an experienced physician, and fecal samples were collected at home by the participants themselves. Microbiota composition was evaluated as relative abundance, α-diversity and Bray-Curtis dissimilarities. Our data suggest that fecal samples and rectal swabs present noninvasive, easily accessible, low-cost sampling tools that are accurate proxies to characterize luminal large intestinal microbiota composition.

Improved biomarkers are needed for pediatric inflammatory bowel disease. Here we identify a diagnostic lipidomic signature for pediatric inflammatory bowel disease by analyzing blood samples from a discovery cohort of incident treatment-naïve pediatric patients and validating findings in an independent inception cohort. The lipidomic signature comprising of only lactosyl ceramide (d18:1/16:0) and phosphatidylcholine (18:0p/22:6) improves the diagnostic prediction compared with high-sensitivity C-reactive protein. Adding high-sensitivity C-reactive protein to the signature does not improve its performance. In patients providing a stool sample, the diagnostic performance of the lipidomic signature and fecal calprotectin, a marker of gastrointestinal inflammation, does not substantially differ. Upon investigation in a third pediatric cohort, the findings of increased lactosyl ceramide (d18:1/16:0) and decreased phosphatidylcholine (18:0p/22:6) absolute concentrations are confirmed. Translation of the lipidomic signature into a scalable diagnostic blood test for pediatric inflammatory bowel disease has the potential to support clinical decision making.

INTRODUCTION: The absence of reliable prognostic markers poses a challenge to the management of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Patients with aggressive disease may not receive sufficient treatment with conventional 'step-up' therapy, whereas a top-down approach may expose patients with indolent disease to unnecessary treatment-related toxicity. The objective of the Nordic IBD treatment strategy trial (NORDTREAT) is to assess the feasibility of personalised therapy by stratifying patients according to a prognostic serum protein signature at diagnosis.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS: NORDTREAT is a multicentre, biomarker-strategy design, open-label controlled trial. After screening consent, eligible patients are randomised (1:1) into one of two groups: a group with access to the protein signature and a group without access. In the access to protein signature group, patients displaying a protein signature suggestive of an increased risk of an aggressive disease course will be treated in line with a top-down treatment algorithm (anti-tumour necrosis factor agent with/without an immunomodulator). In contrast, those with a protein signature indicative of indolent disease will be excluded from the trial. Patients not in the access group receive treatment based on clinical management. This traditional management involves a stepwise escalation of treatment as determined by the investigator after failure of first-line treatment. After 52 weeks, outcomes are assessed in the subgroup of patients with a protein profile indicating a potentially severe disease trajectory. The primary endpoint is a composite of the proportion of patients with corticosteroid-free clinical and endoscopic remission at week 52. Surgical intervention due to IBD during follow-up will be defined as treatment failure.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval has been obtained, and recruitment is underway at sites in four participating Nordic countries (Denmark, Iceland, Norway and Sweden). Following trial completion and data analysis, the trial results will be submitted for publication in peer-reviewed journals and presented at international conferences.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05180175; Pre-results. EudraCT number: 2019-002942-19.

INTRODUCTION: Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), including ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease, can be challenging to diagnose, and treatment outcomes are difficult to predict. In the NORDTREAT cohort study, a Nordic prospective multicentre study, we aim to identify novel molecular biomarkers of diagnostic value by assessing the diagnostic test accuracy (cross-sectionally), as well as the prognostic utility when used as prognostic markers in the long-term (cohort study). In the diagnostic test accuracy study, the primary outcome is a successful diagnosis using one or more novel index tests at baseline compared with the ECCO criteria as the reference standard. The composite outcome of the prognostic utility study is 'severe IBD' within 52 weeks from inclusion, defined as one or more of the following three events: IBD-related surgery, IBD-related hospitalisation or IBD-related death.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We aim to recruit 800 patients referred on suspicion of IBD to this longitudinal observational study, a collaboration between 11 inclusion sites in Denmark, Iceland, Norway and Sweden. Inclusion will occur from February 2022 until December 2023 with screening and baseline visits for all participants and three outcome visits at weeks 12, 26 and 52 after baseline for IBD-diagnosed patients. Biological material (blood, faeces, biopsies, urine and hair), clinical data and lifestyle information will be collected during these scheduled visits.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study will explore novel biomarkers to improve diagnostic accuracy and prediction of disease progression, thereby improving medical therapy and the quality of life for patients with IBD.The study is approved by the Ethics Committee (DK: S-20200051, v1.4, 16.10.2021; IS: VSNb2021070006/03.01, NO: 193064; SE: DNR 2021-05090) and the Danish Data Protecting Agency (20/54594). Results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journals, patient associations and presentations at international conferences.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05414578; Pre-results.