To Örebro University

Background: The restructuring and decentralization of psychiatric services in Norway, aligning with global trends, has sparked debate on quality assurance. This study aimed to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Norwegian version of the Quality in Psychiatric Care - Inpatient Staff (QPC-IPS). Additionally, it sought to investigate the sociodemographic and work-related factors associated with staff perceptions of the quality of inpatient psychiatric care that they provide.

Material and methods: The Swedish QPC-IPS, a 30-item, 6-dimension tool, was thoroughly translated for the Norwegian psychiatric care setting. A web survey, including the QPC-IPS and sociodemographic and work-related items, was distributed to the mental health staff of two Norwegian health trusts, yielding 117 responses.

Results: The adapted version underwent confirmatory factor analysis, revealing a factor structure consistent with the original QPC-IPS and its versions in other languages. Staff generally reported high-quality care, with the highest for the secluded environment and the lowest for the secure environment. Positive associations were found between quality perceptions and factors, such as professional development, openness to quality assurance, and participation in quality work. Psychosocial environments and staff mental health were positively linked to quality-of-care dimensions and the staff recommendations correlated with their perception of patients' experiences of quality of care.

Conclusions: The Norwegian QPC-IPS demonstrated adequate psychometric properties, facilitating its use in assessing psychiatric care staff's perception of patients' experiences of quality of care. Insights from staff perspectives contribute to identifying areas for improvement in inpatient psychiatric care, thereby enhancing cross-cultural comparisons and theory development in this domain.

To review the longitudinal trajectories - and the factors influencing their development - of mental health problems in children with neurodevelopmental disabilities. Systematic review methods were employed. Searches of six databases used keywords and MeSH terms related to children with neurodevelopmental disabilities, mental health problems, and longitudinal research. After the removal of duplicates, reviewers independently screened records for inclusion, extracted data (outcomes and influencing factors), and evaluated the risk of bias. Findings were tabulated and synthesized using graphs and a narrative. Searches identified 94,662 unique records, from which 49 publications were included. The median publication year was 2015. Children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder were the most commonly included population in retrieved studies. In almost 50% of studies, trajectories of mental health problems changed by < 10% between the first and last time point. Despite multiple studies reporting longitudinal trajectories of mental health problems, greater conceptual clarity and consideration of the measures included in research is needed, along with the inclusion of a more diverse range of populations of children with neurodevelopmental disabilities.

INTRODUCTION: The rising prevalence of autism spectrum disorder (ASD) among children poses significant challenges for healthcare services. Research has underscored the crucial role of children's involvement in their healthcare. However, due to the intricate nature of ASD, marked by communication and social interaction differences, healthcare providers face challenges in tailoring their services to accommodate these children. This project aims to explore the impact of two distinct needs assessment models on children's participation in the needs assessment process.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will conduct a prospective observational study comparing responses from children subjected to two different needs assessment procedures: survey-based and meeting-based. Supplementary data will be collected from the children's parents/guardians and healthcare professionals. Data collection methods will include questionnaires, interviews and document analysis of individual habilitation plans. We aim to recruit 120 children aged 7-17 diagnosed with ASD but without intellectual disability, with 60 undergoing the survey-based needs assessment and 60 undergoing the meeting-based assessment. The primary outcome measure will be the perception of participation in the needs assessment procedure. Secondary outcomes will include the children's quality of life and mental health; the parents' knowledge of their child's strengths, abilities and special needs; and the parents' perception of the quality of collaboration with the healthcare team.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study received ethics approval from the Swedish Ethical Review Authority on 4 March 2024 (reference number 2024-00227-01). All children and their caregivers will receive both verbal and written information about the study before being asked to provide written informed consent to participate. The findings will be disseminated through publication in peer-reviewed journals and presentation at conferences. Additionally, a popular science report summarising the data and its interpretation will be published.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT06381856.

Background: The implementation of interventions in clinical practices is a challenge across healthcare settings, particularly in the field of habilitation. To improve access to research-based treatment, there is a need to understand and explain factors affecting the implementation of interventions. The purpose of this systematic review is to identify, appraise and synthesise staff experience of the implementation of interventions for adults with congenital disabilities into a comprehensive overview.

Method: Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) methodology, we conducted a search using the Medline, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Sociological Abstract, Applied Social Sciences Index and Abstracts (ASSIA) and Web of Science databases. To be eligible, studies had to have collected data (qualitative or quantitative) that specifically addressed the implementation process.

Findings: Of the 5430 studies initially retrieved, eight met the inclusion criteria. Staff-identified barriers and facilitators, as well as strategies and outcomes, were grouped into three themes: (1) conditions for implementation, (2) acceptability of interventions and (3) approach for change. The most commonly cited barriers and facilitators were organisation structure and culture, financial and personnel resources, relevance of interventions, and communication and collaboration.

Conclusions: When implementing an intervention, it is necessary to consider barriers and facilitators across all three identified themes to increase the likelihood of implementation success. The compiled results of the included studies provide insights that further our understanding of implementation and our knowledge of the influence of factors on the implementation of interventions within habilitation settings. This review highlights knowledge gaps and areas for future study in the context of habilitation implementation.

BACKGROUND: Validated instruments measuring the quality of mental healthcare from patients' perspectives are scarce, and available instruments have been requested. One of the few instruments measuring the quality of care from a patient's perspective is the Swedish Quality in Psychiatric Care-In-Patient (QPC-IP). This cross-sectional study aimed to translate and adapt the QPC-IP instrument for a Norwegian context and assess its psychometric properties.

METHODS: The QPC-IP was translated and adapted to a Norwegian context using a translation back-translation process model. A total of 169 inpatients from specialised mental health services responded to the questionnaire. The QPC-IP comprises six dimensions: Encounter (eight items), Participation (eight items), Discharge (four items), Support (four items), Secluded Environment (three items), and Secure Environment (three items), totalling 30 items. Confirmatory factor analysis was conducted to assess the instrument's factor structure. Additionally, Cronbach's alpha was used to establish the instrument's internal consistency.

RESULTS: The results indicated that the Norwegian adaptation of the QPC-IP possesses good psychometric properties, including internal consistency, content, and construct validity, as confirmed by the confirmatory factor analysis results. The confirmatory factor analysis demonstrated an adequate fit for the six-factor structure, consistent with the original Swedish instrument.

CONCLUSIONS: The QPC-IP is a user-friendly and easily implementable tool that assesses various dimensions of the quality of inpatient mental healthcare from a patient's perspective. Moreover, the Norwegian QPC-IP holds potential for use in comparative, cross-cultural studies within mental healthcare services to monitor the quality of the provided services.

PURPOSE: Evaluating the quality of psychiatric care from the patient's perspective is crucial to measure the effectiveness of the provided care. This study aimed to translate the original Swedish Quality in Psychiatric Care - Inpatient (QPC-IP) instrument into Faroese, adapting it to the specific context of psychiatric inpatient care in the Faroe Islands, conducting a detailed evaluation of its psychometric properties, and to describe patients' perception of quality of psychiatric care.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Following a thorough translation and back-translation, the content validity of the Faroese QPC-IP was confirmed by a group of Faroese patients. Subsequently, the instrument was completed by 61 psychiatric inpatients. RESULTS: Item total correlations revealed that most items strongly correlated with their intended dimensions, mirroring the original Swedish version. However, a noteworthy exception was found in the discharge dimension, leading to the exclusion of an item related to helping find an occupation; this task was not performed by the ward. While the internal consistency of the overall scale was excellent, specific dimensions exhibited lower consistency.

CONCLUSIONS: The translation and cultural adaptation of the Faroese QPC-IP proved satisfactory. The psychometric evaluation affirmed a shared understanding of the quality of psychiatric care in both Faroese and Swedish cultural contexts. As a result, the Faroese QPC-IP emerges as a valuable instrument for assessing the quality of psychiatric care in the Faroe Islands. Its utility extends to quality assurance initiatives and contributes to cross-cultural research examining the quality of psychiatric care from the patient's perspective.

OBJECTIVE: The aim was to examine the psychometric properties of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) in cohorts of working age stroke survivors, before and after inpatient rehabilitation.

METHODS: Stroke patients aged 18-66 years registered in the national quality register WebRehab Sweden were included in the study at hospital admission (n = 256), discharge (n = 223), and 1-year follow-up (n = 313). Classical and modern (Rasch) methods were used for psychometric evaluation.

RESULTS: The two-factor HADS model measuring anxiety and depression showed better fit than a single factor measuring emotional distress. The instrument's psychometric stability before and after rehabilitation was satisfactory. The anxiety scale showed good psychometric properties, except for item 7, which is not anxiety-specific. Some concerns were observed for the depression items showing weaker discriminant validity, and item 8 performing poorly as a measure of depression. Cronbach's alpha and McDonald's omega coefficients showed satisfactory internal consistency reliability, whereas Rasch person reliability coefficients indicated weaker reliability, especially for the depression scale. Effect size of change between hospital admission and discharge showed a reduction in anxiety and depression symptoms.

CONCLUSIONS: HADS showed a stable two-factor structure over the rehabilitation period. Patients' perception of items was not affected by the recovery, allowing relevant comparison of HADS scores between different phases of the rehabilitation process. Measures of responsiveness suggest that HADS is sensitive to capturing improvements in emotional distress following rehabilitation interventions. Overall, despite minor psychometric weaknesses, HADS is a suitable instrument for assessing anxiety and depresssion symptoms in stroke patients aged 18-66 years.

Background: Contextual factors influence interventions in healthcare and pose a particular challenge in interventions designed for people with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities (PIMDs). Exploring support persons’ and health personnel’s experience of anintervention may improve our understanding of the influence of contextual factors. Such exploration is important for revealing areas and focus points for future implementations. Therefore, the aim of this study is to explore support persons’ and health personnel’s experience of contextual factors during involvement in an intervention for people with PIMD.

Method: This focus group study includes eight groups, comprising a total of 34 support persons and health personnel, at habilitation centres at four regions in central Sweden. Data were analysed inductively using a content analysis approach.

Findings: Three themes emerged from the analysis of the informants’ perspectives on the contextual factors: (1) structure and support enhances intervention feasibility, (2) an intervention’s benefit for people with PIMD increases its acceptability and (3) being engaged and involved increases support persons’ and health personnel’s motivation. Our findings show that the implementation of an intervention for people with PIMD should focus on the recipients of the intervention in its context, forming a clear communication plan.

Conclusions: A training programme should be provided for the recipients and providers of the intervention. Finally, the implementation process can be facilitated by creating space for staff to contribute and by encouraging participation and ownership for everyone involved. Using a co-design strategy can enable a shared responsibility to solve the identified challenges, while contributing to the development and design of future interventions for people with disabilities.

Introduction: Contextual factors influence interventions in healthcare and pose a particular challenge in interventions designed for people with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities (PIMD). Exploring support persons’ and health personnel’s experience of an intervention may improve our understanding of the influence of contextual factors. Such exploration is important for revealing areas and focus points for future implementations. Therefore, the aim of this study is to explore support persons’ and health personnel’s experience of contextual factors during involvement in an intervention for people with PIMD.

Methods: This focus group study includes eight groups, comprising a total of 34 support persons and health personnel, at habilitation centres at four regions in central Sweden. Data were analysed inductively using a content analysis approach.

Results: Three themes emerged from the analysis of the informants’ perspectives on the contextual factors: (1) structure and support enhances intervention feasibility; (2) an intervention’s benefit for people with PIMD increases its acceptability; and (3) being engaged and involved increases support persons’ and health personnel’s motivation. Our findings show that the implementation of an intervention for people with PIMD should focus on the recipients of the intervention in its context, forming a clear communication plan. A training programme should be provided for the recipients and providers of the intervention.

Discussion: Finally, the implementation process can be facilitated by creating space for staff to contribute and by encouraging participation and ownership for everyone involved. Using a co-design strategy can enable a shared responsibility to solve the identified challenges, while contributing to the development and design of future interventions for people with disabilities.

Background/Objectives: The quality of care in forensic mental health services is a factor that significantly impacts recovery and constitutes a right of the individuals receiving treatment. However, there is a lack of instruments to assess the perceived quality of care among individuals in this setting. Quality in Psychiatric Care-Forensic Inpatient (QPC-FIP) is a Swedish instrument that measures the perception of quality care from the perspectives of patients in the forensic setting. The aim of this study was to perform a cross-cultural adaptation of the QPC-FIP instrument into Spanish and to assess its reliability and validity.

Methods: For the adaptation process, a translation-backtranslation of the instrument was performed. Regarding psychometric properties, the sample consisted of 120 inpatients in the forensic setting to whom the instrument was applied. To assess temporal stability, the instrument was readministered after 10 days (n = 98).

Results: The confirmatory factor analysis showed an equivalent seven-factor structure with the original version, presenting a satisfactory model fit. Regarding reliability, the Cronbach's alpha value was 0.933, and the intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.836 (95% IC: 0.742-0.896), revealing results higher than 0.70 in six of the seven factors.

Conclusions: The Spanish version of the QPC-FIP instrument showed adequate validity and reliability values, indicating that is a useful tool for measuring quality in psychiatric care in the forensic context.