To Örebro University

The aim of this study was to investigate Swedish children’s and parents’ attitudes and knowledge about human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination a year after gender-neutral HPV vaccination was introduced in Sweden’s national immunization program (NIP). Additional information about HPV and vaccine was provided in the extended immunazation program. In total, 276 parents and 206 children from 22 School Health Services responded to a web-based survey. Results showed that half of the children and about a third of the parents received additional Public Health Agency information about HPV vaccination, and a majority were satisfied. Parents considered HPV vaccination being important for their children’s health, and both children and parents considered it important to vaccinate all genders against HPV. Both children and parents rated school nurses as most reliable source of HPV vaccination information. Teachers were also a common source of HPV and HPV vaccination information for children. Further research among teachers in Sweden is needed to explore their knowledge and abilities to inform students and parents about HPV and vaccination.

Background

Preterm infants are vulnerable and sensitive to stimuli, during their stay in neonatal intensive care they undergo frequent stressful and painful procedures. One of these painful procedures is the screening for retinopathy of prematurity, ROP. In Sweden all preterm infants born before gestation week 30 undergo ROP-screening. The screening involves regular eye examinations to detect ROP at the early stages and these examinations are both stressful and painful. Several studies have investigated different ways of pain management during eye examinations with inconsequent results. No study has investigated Clonidine as pain management during ROP-screening.  

Aim

The aim of this clinical trial is to investigate the analgesic effect of clonidine during ROP eyeexaminations.

Method

This study is a multicenter randomized controlled clinical trial with a crossover design. Infants born before gestation week 30 and therefore undergoing ROP-screening, will be eligible for inclusion in the study. Infants will be recruited from two Swedish NICUs (neonatal intensive care units). The NICUs use different examination techniques, where NICU A uses indirect ophthalmoscopy while NICU B uses RetCam. A total of 50 infants will be recruited (25 at each NICU).  During the first eye examination the infant will be randomized to either clonidine 4mcg/kg or sterile water in the equivalent dose 60 minutes before the eye examination. The order of the treatment is blinded for everyone except the nurse preparing the study solution. During the second eye examination the infant will receive the study solution, (intervention or placebo) that he/she did not receive the first time.  The primary outcome of the study is pain assessment with the Premature Infant Pain Profile – Revised. The infants´ face and monitor showing oxygen saturation and heart rate will be videorecorded to be able to assess the pain afterwards. The secondary outcome is Galvanic Skin Response where three probes are attached to the infant’s foot sole to register changes in the sweat gland activity in response to stimuli such as pain or stress. The ophthalmologist performing the eye examination will also rate how easy it was to examine the infant by marking an X on a 10cm VAS scale with “very easy to examine” on one end and “very difficult to examine” on the other end.  Data collection is ongoing with 19 infants included at the moment.  

Background: Changes in demographics with an older population, the illness panorama with increasing prevalence of non-communicable diseases, and the shift from hospital care to home-based care place demand on primary health care, which requires multiprofessional collaboration and team-based organization of work. The COVID-19 pandemic affected health care in various ways, such as heightened infection control measures, changing work practices, and increased workload.

Objectives: This study aimed to investigate the association between primary care practices’ organization, and quality and safety changes during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Design: Data were collected from 38 countries in a large online survey, the PRICOV-19 study. For this paper, the participating practices were categorized as “Only GPs”, comprising practices with solely general practitioners (GPs) and/or GP trainees, without any other health care professionals (n = 1,544), and “Multiprofessional,” comprising practices with at least one GP or GP trainee and one or more other health professionals (n = 3,936).

Results: Both categories of practices improved in infection control routines when compared before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. A larger proportion of the multiprofessional practices changed their routines to protect vulnerable patients. Telephone triage was used in more “Multiprofessional” practices, whereas “Only GPs” were more likely to perform video consultations as an alternative to physical visits. Both types of practices reported that the time to review new guidelines and scientific literature decreased during the pandemic. However, both had more meetings to discuss directives than before the pandemic.

Conclusions: Multiprofessional teams were keener to introduce changes to the care organization to protect vulnerable patients. However, practices with only GPs were found to be more aligned with video consultations, perhaps reflecting the close patient-doctor relationship. In contrast, telephone triage was used more in multiprofessional teams.

Background: There is variability in the use of sedatives and analgesics in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs). We aimed to investigate the use of analgesics and sedatives and the management of neonatal pain and distress.

Methods: This was a global, prospective, cross-sectional study. A survey was distributed May–November 2022. The primary outcome of this research was to compare results between countries depending on their socio-sanitary level using the sociodemographic index (SDI). We organized results based on geographical location.

Results: The survey collected 1304 responses, but we analyzed 924 responses after database cleaning. Responses from 98 different countries were analyzed. More than 60% of NICUs reported having an analgosedation guideline, and one-third of respondents used neonatal pain scales in more than 80% of neonates. We found differences in the management of sedation and analgesia between NICUs on different continents, but especially between countries with different SDIs. Countries with a higher SDI had greater availability of and adherence to analgosedation guidelines, as well as higher rates of analgosedation for painful or distressing procedures. Countries with different SDIs reported differences in analgosedation for neonatal intubation, invasive ventilation, and therapeutic hypothermia, among others.

Conclusions: Socio-economic status of countries impacts on neonatal analgosedation management.

Introduction: Research related to parent-led neonatal pain management is increasing, as is the clinical implementation. Skin-to-skin contact, breastfeeding and parents’ vocalizations are examples of pain reducing methods that give parents an opportunity to protect their infant from harm while alleviating their anxiety and developing their parenting skills.

Methods: In this paper we will provide a narrative review and describe the current research about parent-led neonatal pain management. Based on this we will discuss clinical challenges, implementation strategies and implications for future research.

Results: Parents express great readiness to embrace opportunities to increase their self-efficacy in their ability to address infant pain. Parent-led pain- reducing methods are effective, feasible, cost-effective, culturally sensitive, and can be individualized and tailored to both the parent’s and infant’s needs. Both barriers and facilitators of parent-led pain care have been studied in research highlighting structural, organizational, educational, and intra- and interpersonal aspects. For example, health care professionals’ attitudes and beliefs on parent-led methods, and their concern that parental presence during a procedure increases staff anxiety. On the other hand, the presence of a local pain champion whose duty is to facilitate the adoption of pain control measures and actively promote parent-professional collaboration, is crucial for culture change in neonatal pain management and nurses have a key role in this change. The knowledge-to-practice gap in parent-led management of infants’ procedure-related pain highlight the need for broader educational applications and collaborative professional, parental and research initiatives to facilitate practice change.

Conclusion: Parent-led neonatal pain management is more than simply a humane and compassionate thing to do. The inclusion of parent-led pain care has been scientifically proven to be one of the most effective ways to reduce pain associated with repeated painful procedures in early life and parents report a desire to participate. Focus on enablers across interprofessional, organizational and structural levels and implementation of recommended pediatric pain guidelines can support the provision of optimal evidence-based family-centered neonatal pain management.

Parents as pain management in Swedish neonatal care (SWEpap), is a new cutting-edge interdisciplinary multi-center clinical study. Using a mixed methods approach, SWEpap investigates combined parent-delivered interventions such as infant-directed lullaby singing, breastfeeding and skin-to-skin contact where parents themselves mediate pain alleviation. This approach is consistent with a modern understanding of pain and of family-integrated care. Today non-pharmacological strategies are considered the first choice in neonatal pain management, and parent-delivered interventions are valuable but often overlooked resources in the procedural pain management in newborn infants. Research shows that parents desire to be actively involved. More research on parents’ experiences of being active in pain alleviation is needed, as well as research on the effectiveness of combined parent-delivered pain management including relationship-based interventions as the parent’s musical presence.  The qualitative part of the project is investigating the experiences and attitudes of parents and nurses towards combined parent-delivered pain management. The study applies a collaborative participatory action research (PAR) design with ethnographic inspired data collection in form of focus groups, video-observations, and video-stimulated recall interviews for data collection.  ResultsPreparation was considered the key for combined parent-delivered pain management. Both parents and nurses emphasized the importance of allowing time for the parent-infant dyad to calm down together before the painful procedure to cope with the situation. The combined parent-delivered pain management was considered feasible by both parents and nurses. Parents expressed that the singing helped them focus on their infant instead of the procedure. The parental lullaby singing created a calm and trusting atmosphere, affecting not only the parent-infant dyad but also the nurses. After the procedure both parents and nurses felt that they have successfully supported the infant through a painful procedure.  The second part of the ongoing SWEpap project is a randomized controlled trial investigating the efficacy of combined parent-delivered pain management with live parental lullaby singing, skin-to-skin contact, and breastfeeding compared with standard pain care during routine blood sampling of healthy newborn infants.