Open this publication in new window or tab >> Show others...
2024 (English) In: BMC Health Services Research, E-ISSN 1472-6963, Vol. 24, article id 737Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en] Background: Changes in demographics with an older population, the illness panorama with increasing prevalence of non-communicable diseases, and the shift from hospital care to home-based care place demand on primary health care, which requires multiprofessional collaboration and team-based organization of work. The COVID-19 pandemic affected health care in various ways, such as heightened infection control measures, changing work practices, and increased workload.
Objectives: This study aimed to investigate the association between primary care practices’ organization, and quality and safety changes during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Design: Data were collected from 38 countries in a large online survey, the PRICOV-19 study. For this paper, the participating practices were categorized as “Only GPs”, comprising practices with solely general practitioners (GPs) and/or GP trainees, without any other health care professionals (n = 1,544), and “Multiprofessional,” comprising practices with at least one GP or GP trainee and one or more other health professionals (n = 3,936).
Results: Both categories of practices improved in infection control routines when compared before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. A larger proportion of the multiprofessional practices changed their routines to protect vulnerable patients. Telephone triage was used in more “Multiprofessional” practices, whereas “Only GPs” were more likely to perform video consultations as an alternative to physical visits. Both types of practices reported that the time to review new guidelines and scientific literature decreased during the pandemic. However, both had more meetings to discuss directives than before the pandemic.
Conclusions: Multiprofessional teams were keener to introduce changes to the care organization to protect vulnerable patients. However, practices with only GPs were found to be more aligned with video consultations, perhaps reflecting the close patient-doctor relationship. In contrast, telephone triage was used more in multiprofessional teams.
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
BioMed Central (BMC), 2024
Keywords COVID-19, International comparison, Interprofessional collaboration, Multiprofessional, Infection prevention and control, Pricov-19, Quality of care
National Category
Public Health, Global Health and Social Medicine Nursing
Identifiers urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-114248 (URN) 10.1186/s12913-024-11173-y (DOI) 001248065200008 () 38877434 (PubMedID) 2-s2.0-85196000490 (Scopus ID)
Projects Pricov-19
Funder Örebro University
2024-06-142024-06-142025-02-20 Bibliographically approved