oru.sePublications
Change search
Link to record
Permanent link

Direct link
BETA
Strand, Susanne, DocentORCID iD iconorcid.org/0000-0002-8285-0935
Publications (10 of 117) Show all publications
Petersson, J., Strand, S. & Selenius, H. (2019). Risk factors for intimate partner violence: A comparison of antisocial and family-only perpetrators. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 34(2), 219-239
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Risk factors for intimate partner violence: A comparison of antisocial and family-only perpetrators
2019 (English)In: Journal of Interpersonal Violence, ISSN 0886-2605, E-ISSN 1552-6518, Vol. 34, no 2, p. 219-239Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Subtyping male perpetrators of intimate partner violence (IPV) based ontheir generality of violence could facilitate the difficult task of matchingperpetrator subtype with efficient risk management strategies. As such, theaim of the present study was to compare antisocial and family-only maleperpetrators of interpersonal violence in terms of (a) demographic andlegal characteristics, (b) risk factors for violence, and (c) assessed risk andthe importance of specific risk factors for violence. A quantitative designwas used in this retrospective register study on data obtained from theSwedish police. Risk assessments performed with the Swedish version ofthe Brief Spousal Assault Form for the Evaluation of Risk (B-SAFER) andpolice registers were used. A sample of 657 male alleged IPV perpetratorswere classified as antisocial (n = 341) or family-only (n = 316) based on theirgenerality of violence. The results showed that the antisocial perpetratorswere significantly younger, as well as more psychologically abusive. Antisocialperpetrators also had significantly more present risk factors for IPV, and wereassessed with a significantly higher risk for acute and severe or deadly IPV, compared with the family-only perpetrators. The subtypes also evidencedunique risk factors with a significant impact on elevated risk for acute andsevere or deadly such violence. Key findings in the present study concernedthe subtypes evidencing unique risk factors increasing the risk for acute andsevere or deadly IPV. Major implications of this study include the findings ofsuch unique “red flag” risk factors for each subtype. To prevent future IPV,it is vital for the risk assessor to be aware of these red flags when makingdecisions about risk, as well as risk management strategies.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Sage Publications, 2019
Keywords
intimate partner violence, antisocial perpetrators, family-only perpetrators, B-SAFER, risk factors
National Category
Psychology
Research subject
Criminology
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-49583 (URN)10.1177/0886260516640547 (DOI)000453216700001 ()27021731 (PubMedID)2-s2.0-85052022255 (Scopus ID)
Note

Funding Agency:

Swedish Crime Victim Compensation and Support Authority

Available from: 2016-03-29 Created: 2016-03-29 Last updated: 2019-01-08Bibliographically approved
Strand, S. & Holmberg, G. (2018). Den rättspsykiatriska vården (2ed.). Lund: Studentlitteratur AB
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Den rättspsykiatriska vården
2018 (Swedish)Book (Other academic)
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Lund: Studentlitteratur AB, 2018. p. 299 Edition: 2
National Category
Forensic Science
Research subject
Psychiatry
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-69114 (URN)978-91-44-11584-9 (ISBN)
Available from: 2018-09-30 Created: 2018-09-30 Last updated: 2018-10-01Bibliographically approved
Shepherd, S. M., Strand, S., Viljoen, J. L. & Daffern, M. (2018). Evaluating the utility of ‘strength’ items when assessing the risk of young offenders. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology, 29(4), 597-616
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Evaluating the utility of ‘strength’ items when assessing the risk of young offenders
2018 (English)In: Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology, ISSN 1478-9949, E-ISSN 1478-9957, Vol. 29, no 4, p. 597-616Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

There is emerging recognition that positive or pro-social characteristics may lessen criminal propensity. There are now several adult and youth forensic instruments that include protective or strength components. Yet evidence supporting the protective capacities of these instruments with youth offending populations is still developing. This study aimed to identity the prevalence of strength items on the Youth Level of Service/Case Management Inventory tool, and their relationships with risk and re-offending for a cohort of 212 multi-cultural Australian juveniles in custody. The prevalence of strengths in the sample was low, and differed by cultural group. Young people who possessed a strength yielded lower instrument total and domain scores and were more likely to be afforded a lower level of risk compared to youth without a strength. Moreover, youth who possessed a strength were significantly more likely to desist from re-offending. This association remained after controlling for level of risk. Findings point to the importance of strengths when assessing a young person’s risk for re-offending.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Taylor & Francis Group, 2018
Keywords
youth violence; protective factors; yls/cMi; violence risk assessment; strengths
National Category
Psychology (excluding Applied Psychology) Psychiatry
Research subject
Criminology
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-64325 (URN)10.1080/14789949.2018.1425474 (DOI)000437365700006 ()
Available from: 2018-01-16 Created: 2018-01-16 Last updated: 2018-07-25Bibliographically approved
Petersson, J. & Strand, S. (2018). Family-only perpetrators of intimate partner violence: A systematic review. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Family-only perpetrators of intimate partner violence: A systematic review
2018 (English)In: Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, ISSN 1524-8380, E-ISSN 1552-8324Article, review/survey (Refereed) Epub ahead of print
Abstract [en]

This article presents the first systematic review of family-only intimate partner violence (IPV) perpetrators (as originally proposed by Holtzworth-Munroe & Stuart). The aims of the present review were to summarize and describe the prevalence of the family-only perpetrator subtype, as well as to investigate what characteristics were associated with perpetrators within this subtype. Electronic literature searches in several databases (e.g., PsychINFO, Web of Science, and PubMed) were carried out. Of the 3,434 studies identified, 30 studies met the inclusion criteria as well as the methodological quality criteria. Thematic analyses were conducted, where several themes and subthemes were identified. The proportion of family-only perpetrators, averaged across sample types, was 47.5%. Drawing on the thematic analyses of the reviewed studies, family-only perpetrators presented as a less violent subtype, displaying several pro-social personality traits, as well as a lower degree of psychopathology. The findings were inline with Holtzworth-Munroe and Stuart’s predictions. The findings also demonstrated the utility of a 2-fold typology, consisting of a family-only and a generally violent (GV) subtype, as well as the need to reconsider the one-size-fits-all approach to IPV treatment. We also included a discussion of the terminology of the subtypes and propose an adoption of the terms “partner onlyviolent” and “generally violent” subtypes.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Sage Publications, 2018
Keywords
family-only, general violence, intimate partner violence, subtype, systematic review, typology
National Category
Other Social Sciences
Research subject
Criminology
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-68882 (URN)10.1177/1524838018770410 (DOI)29695216 (PubMedID)
Available from: 2018-09-12 Created: 2018-09-12 Last updated: 2018-10-09Bibliographically approved
Strand, S. & Storey, J. (2018). Intimate Partner Violence in Urban, Rural and Remote Areas: An Investigation of Offense Severity and Risk Factors. Violence against Women, 25(2), 188-207
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Intimate Partner Violence in Urban, Rural and Remote Areas: An Investigation of Offense Severity and Risk Factors
2018 (English)In: Violence against Women, ISSN 1077-8012, E-ISSN 1552-8448, Vol. 25, no 2, p. 188-207Article in journal (Refereed) Epub ahead of print
Abstract [en]

This study compared the severity of intimate partner violence (IPV) and the relationship between risk factors for IPV and overall risk judgments of future IPV in urban, rural, and remote areas. IPV risk assessments conducted by the Swedish police between 2010 and 2014 in urban (n = 564), rural (n = 456), and remote (n = 196) areas were examined. Rurality was associated with the severity of IPV reported, as well as the presence of risk factors and their relationship to overall risk judgments. Cases in remote areas included more severe IPV as well as more risk factors.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Sage Publications, 2018
Keywords
Intimate Partner violence, risk factors, Urban, rural and remote areas, rurality
National Category
Psychology (excluding Applied Psychology)
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-64320 (URN)10.1177/1077801218766611 (DOI)29623774 (PubMedID)
Available from: 2018-01-16 Created: 2018-01-16 Last updated: 2019-01-14Bibliographically approved
Petersson, J., Strand, S. & Selenius, H. (2018). One size does not fit all: How typologies of intimate partner violent men can inform and facilitate police risk assessment and management of such violence. In: : . Paper presented at The Stockholm Criminology Symposium, Stockholm, Sweden, June 10-12, 2018.
Open this publication in new window or tab >>One size does not fit all: How typologies of intimate partner violent men can inform and facilitate police risk assessment and management of such violence
2018 (English)Conference paper, Oral presentation with published abstract (Refereed)
National Category
Other Social Sciences
Research subject
Criminology
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-68884 (URN)
Conference
The Stockholm Criminology Symposium, Stockholm, Sweden, June 10-12, 2018
Available from: 2018-09-12 Created: 2018-09-12 Last updated: 2018-09-13Bibliographically approved
Fröberg, S. & Strand, S. (2018). Police Students' Perceptions of Intimate Partner Violence in Same-Sex Relationships. Partner Abuse, 9(2), 181-201
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Police Students' Perceptions of Intimate Partner Violence in Same-Sex Relationships
2018 (English)In: Partner Abuse, ISSN 1946-6560, E-ISSN 1946-6579, Vol. 9, no 2, p. 181-201Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

The knowledge of same-sex intimate partner violence (IPV) is limited. This study aims to investigate the perception of seriousness of same-sex IPV. A vignette study was undertaken among 248 police students (69% males and 31% females) in Sweden. The vignettes portrayed an intimate partner relationship between two people and were available in four versions with the sex of the offender and victim being alternated. Perceptions of IPV were measured using the Opinions of Domestic Violence Scale (Ahmed et al., 2013). The results showed that regardless of gender, IPV was considered serious; however, same-sex IPV was perceived as less serious than victimization of a heterosexual female but more serious than victimization of a heterosexual male. Police interventions were found to be less needed for same-sex victims than for heterosexual female victims.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Springer Publishing Company, 2018
Keywords
intimate partner violence, same-sex relationships, policing, perception
National Category
Psychology (excluding Applied Psychology)
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-66998 (URN)10.1891/1946-6560.9.2.181 (DOI)000431561000005 ()
Available from: 2018-05-18 Created: 2018-05-18 Last updated: 2018-05-18Bibliographically approved
Strand, S. (2018). Policing stalking. In: : . Paper presented at 11th Annual Conference, Association of European Threat Assessment Professionals (AETAP 2018), Helsinki, Finland, April 23-26, 2018.
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Policing stalking
2018 (English)Conference paper, Oral presentation only (Other academic)
National Category
Psychology
Research subject
Criminology
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-70881 (URN)
Conference
11th Annual Conference, Association of European Threat Assessment Professionals (AETAP 2018), Helsinki, Finland, April 23-26, 2018
Available from: 2018-12-21 Created: 2018-12-21 Last updated: 2019-01-09Bibliographically approved
Strand, S., Fröberg, S. & Storey, J. E. (2018). Protecting victims of intimate partner violence: Swedish prosecutors’ experiences of decision-making regarding restraining orders. Journal of Scandinavian Studies in Criminology and Crime Prevention, 19(2), 170-186
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Protecting victims of intimate partner violence: Swedish prosecutors’ experiences of decision-making regarding restraining orders
2018 (English)In: Journal of Scandinavian Studies in Criminology and Crime Prevention, ISSN 1404-3858, E-ISSN 1651-2340, Vol. 19, no 2, p. 170-186Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Restraining orders can be used as a risk management strategy to reduce the likelihood of intimate partner violence (IPV) re-victimisation. The aim of this study was to examine how prosecutors work with cases of IPV, with a focus on their collaboration with police, use of violence risk assessment and implementation of restraining orders. A qualitative analysis was conducted based on semi-structured interviews with five prosecutors operating in two northern police districts in Sweden in 2016. Data were analysed using latent content analysis. Three overarching themes arose: The case, Organization of resources and Interpretation of the law. Each theme was discussed in the context of the prosecutors’ work with IPV. Prosecutors pointed to several inadequacies in the legislation and offered potential solutions that would ameliorate their work. Results also showed that prosecutors seldom used violence risk assessments conducted by police as a basis for issuing restraining orders. The primary reason for this was a lack of clear routines governing cooperation between police and prosecutors in the application process. The results from this study can be used when training criminal justice personnel in order to obtain a better understanding of the difficulties that prosecutors face when trying to protect victims of IPV.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Taylor & Francis Group, 2018
Keywords
Intimate partner violence, prosecutor, restraining order, police criminal justice system, qualitative study
National Category
Applied Psychology
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-68785 (URN)10.1080/14043858.2018.1450547 (DOI)2-s2.0-85044068657 (Scopus ID)
Available from: 2018-09-06 Created: 2018-09-06 Last updated: 2018-12-03Bibliographically approved
Shea, D., McEwan, T., Strand, S. & Ogloff, J. (2018). The reliability and predictive validity of the Guidelines for Stalking Assessment and Management (SAM). Psychological Assessment, 30(11), 1409-1420
Open this publication in new window or tab >>The reliability and predictive validity of the Guidelines for Stalking Assessment and Management (SAM)
2018 (English)In: Psychological Assessment, ISSN 1040-3590, E-ISSN 1939-134X, Vol. 30, no 11, p. 1409-1420Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

This study assessed the reliability and validity of the Guidelines for Stalking Assessment and Management (SAM), a structured professional judgment measure for assessing stalking risks. The SAM was completed retrospectively from file review for 146 adult stalkers (90.4% male) referred to a community-based forensic mental health service. Interrater reliability (IRR) was initially poor, but developing a strict definition of stalking currency and rescoring the SAM led to improvement. Based on the updated scoring, IRR was moderate for judgments about whether stalking was ongoing at the time of assessment, and fair to moderate for summary risk judgments. Both case prioritization (area under the curve [AUC] = .69) and risk for continued stalking (AUC = .76) ratings discriminated between groups, with high-risk stalkers 5-9 times as likely as low-risk stalkers to reoffend by stalking their original victims. Lifetime SAM total scores (AUC = .70) also featured moderate to good discrimination. Follow-up analyses suggested that this was driven mainly by the recent presence of risk markers and the nature of any ongoing stalking situation rather than historical or individual factors. Findings support the use of the SAM to structure risk judgments made by those with experience in assessing stalking. Current results also imply that IRR might be improved by introducing (a) a fixed definition of stalking currency and (b) usage guidelines for specific contexts.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
American Psychological Association (APA), 2018
Keywords
stalking, risk assessment, structured professional judgment, Guidelines for Stalking Assessment and Management, SAM
National Category
Psychology (excluding Applied Psychology)
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-64324 (URN)10.1037/pas0000589 (DOI)000448896400001 ()29952593 (PubMedID)2-s2.0-85049153123 (Scopus ID)
Note

Funding Agencies:

Australian Research Council Discovery Project  DP1092840 

Australian Postgraduate Award  

Monash University Faculty of Health Sciences Postgraduate Excellence Award 

Available from: 2018-01-16 Created: 2018-01-16 Last updated: 2018-11-20Bibliographically approved
Organisations
Identifiers
ORCID iD: ORCID iD iconorcid.org/0000-0002-8285-0935

Search in DiVA

Show all publications