Open this publication in new window or tab >>Department of Medicine, Otago Medical School, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand .
Discipline of Medicine, The University of Adelaide, Australia; Basil Hetzel Institute, Adelaide, Australia; South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, Australia .
Discipline of Medicine, The University of Adelaide, Australia; Department of Cardiology, Central Adelaide Local Health Network, Australia; Basil Hetzel Institute, Adelaide, Australia.
Sarah Ross Soter Center for Women's Cardiovascular Research, Leon H. Charney Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, New York University, Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Sarah Ross Soter Center for Women's Cardiovascular Research, Leon H. Charney Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, New York University, Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Department of Medical Sciences and Uppsala Clinical Research Center, Uppsala University, Sweden.
Örebro University, School of Medical Sciences. Örebro University Hospital. Department of Cardiology.
Cardiology Department, Auckland City Hospital Green Lane Cardiovascular Services, Auckland, New Zealand .
Department of Clinical Sciences, Danderyd Hospital, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Università degli Studi della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Napoli, Italy.
Canadian VIGOUR Centre, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada (K.B.). University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
Department of Cardiology, Great Western Hospital, Swindon, United Kingdom.
Department of Medical Sciences and Uppsala Clinical Research Center, Uppsala University, Sweden.
Department of Medicine, University of Auckland, New Zealand; Cardiology Department, Middlemore Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand .
Discipline of Medicine, The University of Adelaide, Australia; Department of Cardiology, Central Adelaide Local Health Network, Australia; Basil Hetzel Institute, Adelaide, Australia.
Show others...
2021 (English)In: Circulation. Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes, ISSN 1941-7713, E-ISSN 1941-7705, Vol. 14, no 11, article id e007880Article, review/survey (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]
BACKGROUND: Suspected myocardial infarction (MI) with nonobstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA) occurs in ≈5% to 10% of patients with MI referred for coronary angiography. The prognosis of these patients may differ to those with MI and obstructive coronary artery disease (MI-CAD) and those without a MI (patients without known history of MI [No-MI]). The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the 12-month all-cause mortality of patients with MINOCA.
METHODS: Using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, the terms "MI," "nonobstructive," "angiography," and "prognosis" were searched in PubMed and Embase databases from inception to December 2018, including original, English language MINOCA studies with >100 consecutive patients. Publications with a heterogeneous cohort, unreported coronary stenosis, or exclusively focusing on MINOCA-mimicking conditions, were excluded. Unpublished data were obtained from the MINOCA Global Collaboration. Data were pooled and analyzed using Paule-Mandel, Hartung, Knapp, Sidik & Jonkman, or restricted maximum-likelihood random-effects meta-analysis methodology. Heterogeneity was assessed using Cochran's Q and I2 statistics. The primary outcome was 12-month all-cause mortality in patients with MINOCA, with secondary comparisons to MI-CAD and No-MI.
RESULTS: The 23 eligible studies yielded 55 369 suspected MINOCA, 485 382 MI-CAD, and 33 074 No-MI. Pooled meta-analysis of 14 MINOCA studies accounting for 30 733 patients revealed an unadjusted 12-month all-cause mortality rate of 3.4% (95% CI, 2.6%-4.2%) and reinfarction (n=27 605; 10 studies) in 2.6% (95% CI, 1.7%-3.5%). MINOCA had a lower 12-month all-cause mortality than those with MI-CAD (3.3% [95% CI, 2.5%-4.1%] versus 5.6% [95% CI, 4.1%-7.0%]; odds ratio, 0.60 [95% CI, 0.52-0.70], P<0.001). In contrast, there was a statistically nonsignificant trend towards increased 12-month all-cause mortality in patients with MINOCA (2.6% [95% CI, 0%-5.9%]) compared with No-MI (0.7% [95% CI, 0.1%-1.3%]; odds ratio, 3.71 [95% CI, 0.58-23.61], P=0.09).
CONCLUSIONS: In the largest contemporary MINOCA meta-analysis to date, patients with suspected MINOCA had a favorable prognosis compared with MI-CAD, but statistically nonsignificant trend toward worse outcomes compared to those with No-MI. Registration: URL: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/; Unique identifier: CRD42020145356.
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2021
Keywords
Coronary artery disease, meta-analysis, mortality, myocardial infarction, prognosis
National Category
Cardiac and Cardiovascular Systems
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-95510 (URN)10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.121.007880 (DOI)000749631400005 ()34784229 (PubMedID)2-s2.0-85121993763 (Scopus ID)
Note
Funding agency:
Hospital Research Foundation Basil Hetzel Translational Grant-Potential Mechanisms and Treatment of Postinfarct Angina
2021-11-182021-11-182022-02-09Bibliographically approved