oru.sePublications
Change search
Link to record
Permanent link

Direct link
BETA
Kelemen [Capannini-Kelemen], Katalin, Associate ProfessorORCID iD iconorcid.org/0000-0003-3141-4954
Alternative names
Publications (10 of 25) Show all publications
Kelemen [Capannini-Kelemen], K. & Steuer, M. (2019). Constitutional Court of Hungary (Magyarország Alkotmánybírósága).
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Constitutional Court of Hungary (Magyarország Alkotmánybírósága)
2019 (English)Other (Other academic)
Keywords
constitutional court, Hungary, constitutional justice
National Category
Law and Society Law (excluding Law and Society)
Research subject
Law; Constitutional Law
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-78911 (URN)
Note

The Max Planck Encyclopedia of Comparative Constitutional Law (MPECCoL) is a comprehensive online resource containing analytical comparative articles offering a global overview of constitutional law.

Available from: 2020-01-08 Created: 2020-01-08 Last updated: 2020-01-08Bibliographically approved
Kelemen [Capannini-Kelemen], K. (2019). Constitutional reasoning: a flourishing field of research in comparative law. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 17(4), 1336-1344, Article ID moz098.
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Constitutional reasoning: a flourishing field of research in comparative law
2019 (English)In: International Journal of Constitutional Law, ISSN 1474-2640, E-ISSN 1474-2659, Vol. 17, no 4, p. 1336-1344, article id moz098Article, review/survey (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Constitutional reasoning has been a flourishing field of research in comparative constitutional law in the past decade. This essay reviews two books that have made a significant contribution to the field. The success of these books is also shown by the fact that both were reprinted in paperback last year. The first book, as the author András Jakab declares, “provides a theory for constitutional lawyers about fundamental questions of European constitutional law” (at 1). At the same time, it serves as a conceptual foundation for the second book, which is an edited collection on comparative constitutional reasoning, and the final product of a five-year research project, involving twenty-five scholars from four continents who authored the various contributions, each examining one court’s style of constitutional reasoning. András Jakab is among the leaders of this research project (together with Arthur Dyevre and Giulio Itzcovich) and the editors of the second book. The essay will present the two books in this order.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Oxford University Press, 2019
Keywords
constitutional reasoning, constitutional courts, supreme courts, constitutional law, constitutional theory
National Category
Law (excluding Law and Society)
Research subject
Constitutional Law; Law; Legal Science
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-79684 (URN)10.1093/icon/moz098 (DOI)000509706500024 ()
Note

András Jakab. European Constitutional Language. Cambridge University Press, 2016 (hardback), 2018 (paperback). Pp. 1336. £29.99. ISBN: 978-1-107-57692-6.

András Jakab, Arthur Dyevre, & Giulio Itzcovich (eds.). Comparative Constitutional Reasoning. Cambridge University Press, 2017 (hardback), 2018 (paperback). Pp. 1336 £34.99. ISBN: 978-1-107-44976-3.

Available from: 2020-02-01 Created: 2020-02-01 Last updated: 2020-02-17Bibliographically approved
Kelemen [Capannini-Kelemen], K. (2018). A common law jogrendszerek.
Open this publication in new window or tab >>A common law jogrendszerek
2018 (Hungarian)Other (Refereed)
Keywords
Common law, comparative law
National Category
Law and Society
Research subject
Law; Legal History; Legal Science
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-71084 (URN)
Note

Title in English: The common law legal systems

Available from: 2019-01-02 Created: 2019-01-02 Last updated: 2019-01-18Bibliographically approved
Kelemen [Capannini-Kelemen], K. (2018). Dissenting opinions: A comparative perspective. Richterzeitung "Justice – Justiz – Giustizia" (4)
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Dissenting opinions: A comparative perspective
2018 (English)In: Richterzeitung "Justice – Justiz – Giustizia", ISSN 1661-2981, no 4Article in journal (Other academic) Published
Abstract [en]

The essay discusses the phenomenon of judicial dissent from a comparative perspective, with special focus on European constitutional courts most of which allow the publication of dissenting opinions. It presents the most common arguments for and against the publication of dissent, discusses dissenting opinions’ difficult relationship with certain fundamental principles, such as judicial independence and legal certainty, and examines their personal dimension, i.e. the judges’ point of view. Finally, it reflects on the compatibility of dissenting opinions with the perceived role of the judge in the civil law tradition.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Bern: Weblaw, 2018
Keywords
judicial dissent, dissenting opinions, comparative law, civil law tradition
National Category
Law and Society
Research subject
Legal Science; Law; Legal History
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-78910 (URN)
Note

This article constitutes an excerpt of the main findings and conclusions from the Author’s book Judicial Dissent in European Constitutional Courts: A Comparative and Legal Perspective (Routledge 2018).

Available from: 2020-01-08 Created: 2020-01-08 Last updated: 2020-01-08Bibliographically approved
Kelemen [Capannini-Kelemen], K. (2018). I sistemi giuridici dell'Europa orientale (6ed.). In: Vincenzo Varano, Vittoria Barsotti (Ed.), La tradizione giuridica occidentale: Testi e materiali per un confronto civil law common law (pp. 182-201). Torino: G. Giappichelli Editore
Open this publication in new window or tab >>I sistemi giuridici dell'Europa orientale
2018 (Italian)In: La tradizione giuridica occidentale: Testi e materiali per un confronto civil law common law / [ed] Vincenzo Varano, Vittoria Barsotti, Torino: G. Giappichelli Editore, 2018, 6, p. 182-201Chapter in book (Other academic)
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Torino: G. Giappichelli Editore, 2018 Edition: 6
Keywords
comparative law, western legal tradition, civil law, common law, komparativ rätt, västerländska rättstraditionen
National Category
Law and Society
Research subject
Law; Legal Science; Legal History
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-71082 (URN)9788892113824 (ISBN)
Available from: 2019-01-02 Created: 2019-01-02 Last updated: 2019-01-09Bibliographically approved
Kelemen [Capannini-Kelemen], K. (2018). Judicial Dissent in European Constitutional Courts: A Comparative and Legal Perspective. Oxford: Routledge
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Judicial Dissent in European Constitutional Courts: A Comparative and Legal Perspective
2018 (English)Book (Refereed)
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Oxford: Routledge, 2018. p. 208
Keywords
judicial dissent, dissenting opinions, judicial behaviour, constitutional courts, constitutional justice, transparency, judicial decision-making
National Category
Law and Society
Research subject
Constitutional Law; European Law; Law
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-59450 (URN)9781472482235 (ISBN)
Available from: 2017-09-04 Created: 2017-09-04 Last updated: 2017-09-04Bibliographically approved
Kelemen [Capannini-Kelemen], K. (2018). Különvélemények a magyar Alkotmánybíróság gyakorlatában (1990–2010). Közjogi Szemle (2), 24-36
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Különvélemények a magyar Alkotmánybíróság gyakorlatában (1990–2010)
2018 (Hungarian)In: Közjogi Szemle, ISSN 1789-6991, no 2, p. 24-36Article in journal (Other academic) Published
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Budapest: HVG-ORAC, 2018
Keywords
dissenting opinions, Hungarian Constitutional Court
National Category
Law and Society
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-71083 (URN)
Note

Hungarian translation of a subchapter of the Author's book "Judicial dissent in European constitutional courts: A comparative and legal perspective" (Routledge 2017)

Title in English: Dissenting opinions in the practice of the Hungarian Constitutional Court (1990-2010) 

Available from: 2019-01-02 Created: 2019-01-02 Last updated: 2019-01-09Bibliographically approved
Kelemen [Capannini-Kelemen], K. (2017). Book Review: Katalin Kelemen on András Jakab, Arthur Dyevre & Giulio Itzcovich’s “Comparative Constitutional Reasoning”. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Book Review: Katalin Kelemen on András Jakab, Arthur Dyevre & Giulio Itzcovich’s “Comparative Constitutional Reasoning”
2017 (English)Other (Other academic)
Place, publisher, year, pages
Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017
Keywords
book review, constitutional reasoning, comparative law, empirical research
National Category
Law (excluding Law and Society) Law and Society
Research subject
Constitutional Law; Law; Legal Science
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-63750 (URN)
Note

Blog of the International Journal of Constitutional Law

Available from: 2018-01-02 Created: 2018-01-02 Last updated: 2018-01-08Bibliographically approved
Kelemen [Capannini-Kelemen], K. (2017). The Hungarian Constitutional Court and the concept of national constitutional identity. Paper presented at Workshop ‘European Union, States and Citizens. Between Anti-Europeanism and Conditionality’, University of Siena, Siena, Italy, 22-23 June, 2017. Ianus - Diritto e finanza (15-16), 23-34
Open this publication in new window or tab >>The Hungarian Constitutional Court and the concept of national constitutional identity
2017 (English)In: Ianus - Diritto e finanza, ISSN 1974-9805, no 15-16, p. 23-34Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

In a long-awaited decision published in December (Decision no. 22/2016 (XII.5.) AB of 30 November 2016, the only one officially translated into English that year), the Hungarian Constitutional Court seems to have settled some of the questions related to the relationship between the EU legal order and Hungary’s constitutional order. In this decision, the Hungarian constitutional judges offer some guidance on two important concepts: state sovereignty and constitutional self-identity.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Siena, Italy: University of Siena, 2017
Keywords
Hungary, constitution, constitutional identity, constitutional court, national identity, constitutional review
National Category
Law (excluding Law and Society) Law and Society
Research subject
Constitutional Law; European Law
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-63738 (URN)
Conference
Workshop ‘European Union, States and Citizens. Between Anti-Europeanism and Conditionality’, University of Siena, Siena, Italy, 22-23 June, 2017
Available from: 2017-12-31 Created: 2017-12-31 Last updated: 2018-01-09Bibliographically approved
Kelemen [Capannini-Kelemen], K. (2017). The New Hungarian Constitution: Legal Critiques from Europe. Review of Central and Eastern European Law, 42(1), 1-49
Open this publication in new window or tab >>The New Hungarian Constitution: Legal Critiques from Europe
2017 (English)In: Review of Central and Eastern European Law, ISSN 0925-9880, E-ISSN 1573-0352, Vol. 42, no 1, p. 1-49Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Hungarian constitutional and legislative reforms have been in the spotlight since Hungary’sadoption of a new Fundamental Law, which entered into force on the first day of2012. Europe’s two leading international organizations (the Council of Europe and theEuropean Union) already issued an opinion about it the year before its entry into force,and they continued to closely follow Hungarian constitutional developments duringensuing years. The new Fundamental Law was followed by a series of new ‘cardinallaws’ and many controversial reforms. This article presents and discusses the opinionsdelivered by the Venice Commission, the European Court of Human Rights, and theeu institutions on these reforms and the different types of arguments on which theyrelied. This article also aims to present the interaction between the Hungarian governmentand Europe’s two leading organizations concerning the new constitutional settingof Hungary, focusing on the legal arguments in each case.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Brill Nijhoff, 2017
Keywords
Hungary; Hungarian Fundamental Law; Constitutional law; Venice Commission; European Union; Council of Europe; Hungarian cardinal laws
National Category
Law (excluding Law and Society)
Research subject
Constitutional Law; European Law
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-59449 (URN)10.1163/15730352-04201001 (DOI)000408580700001 ()2-s2.0-85024858629 (Scopus ID)
Available from: 2017-09-04 Created: 2017-09-04 Last updated: 2019-04-10Bibliographically approved
Organisations
Identifiers
ORCID iD: ORCID iD iconorcid.org/0000-0003-3141-4954

Search in DiVA

Show all publications

Profile pages

Academia.edu