Open this publication in new window or tab >>Örebro University, School of Medical Sciences. Örebro University Hospital. Department of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery.
Department of Thoracic Surgery, Blekinge Hospital, Karlskrona, Sweden.
Örebro University, School of Medical Sciences. Örebro University Hospital. Department of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery.
Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Linköping University Hospital, Linköping, Sweden; Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Unit of Cardiovascular Medicine, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Uppsala Clinical Research Center, Uppsala University, Dag Hammarskjölds väg 38SE-751 85 Uppsala, Sweden.
Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden; Department of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Örebro University, School of Medical Sciences. Örebro University Hospital. Department of Radiology.
Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden; Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden; Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Department of Thoracic Surgery, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden; Department of Surgical Sciences, Thoracic Surgery, Uppsala University, Sweden.
Uppsala Clinical Research Center, Uppsala University, Dag Hammarskjölds väg 38SE-751 85 Uppsala, Sweden; Department of Medical Sciences, Cardiology, Uppsala University Hospital, 751 85 Uppsala, Sweden.
Show others...
2025 (English)In: European Heart Journal, ISSN 0195-668X, E-ISSN 1522-9645, article id ehaf018Article in journal (Refereed) Epub ahead of print
Abstract [en]
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: No-touch saphenous vein harvesting may enhance graft patency and improve clinical outcomes after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).
METHODS: In this registry-based, randomized trial, patients undergoing CABG were randomly assigned to no-touch or conventional harvesting. The primary composite outcome was the proportion of patients with occluded/stenosed >50% vein graft on coronary computed tomography angiography, or who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention to a vein graft, or died. Secondary outcomes included clinical outcomes and leg wound complications.
RESULTS: A total of 902 patients were enrolled with a mean total number of distal vein anastomoses of 2.0 (SD 0.87). The primary endpoint occurred in 90/454 (19.8%) of patients randomized to no-touch and in 107/446 (24.0%) of patients randomized to the conventional technique [difference, -4.3 percentage points; 95% confidence interval (CI) -10.1-1.6; P = .15] at a mean follow-up time of 3.5 (SD 0.1) years. The composite of death, myocardial infarction, or repeat revascularization at 4.4 (SD 1.3) years occurred in 57/454 (12.6%) and 44/446 (9.9%) in the no-touch and conventional groups, respectively (hazard ratio 1.3; 95% CI, 0.87-1.93). Leg wound complications were more common in patients assigned to no-touch harvesting at 3 months [107/433 (24.7%) vs. 59/427 (13.8%); difference, 10.9 percentage points; 95% CI 5.7-16.1]. At 2 years, 189/381 (49.6%) vs. 91/361 (25.2%) had remaining leg symptoms (difference, 24.4 percentage points; 95% CI 17.7-31.1).
CONCLUSIONS: No-touch vein graft harvesting for CABG was not superior to conventional open harvesting in reducing vein graft failure or clinical events after CABG but increased leg wound complications. The primary outcome requires cautious interpretation due to a lower-than-expected number of primary events.
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Oxford University Press, 2025
Keywords
Coronary artery disease, Long-term outcomes, Mortality, Myocardial infarction, Surgical complications
National Category
Cardiology and Cardiovascular Disease Surgery
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-119378 (URN)10.1093/eurheartj/ehaf018 (DOI)001425439900001 ()39969129 (PubMedID)
Funder
Swedish Research Council, 2017-00214Swedish Heart Lung Foundation, 20170428
2025-02-202025-02-202025-03-04Bibliographically approved