To Örebro University

Patient perspectives on the quality of care received are fundamental to mental health care. This study aimed to investigate the association between patient-reported mental health care quality, perceived coercion, and various demographic, clinical, and ward-related factors. Using a cross-sectional design, data were collected from 169 patients in Norwegian mental health wards using the quality in psychiatric care-inpatient (QPC-IP) instrument and experienced coercion scale (ECS). The analysis revealed a consistent pattern in which patients with higher perceived coercion consistently rated lower quality on all QPC-IP dimensions. The significant findings of the multiple regression models further supported this association. Beyond coercion, the factors influencing quality ratings include self-reported treatment results, participation in treatment planning, and knowledge of complaint procedures. Emphasizing the pivotal role of coercion in enhancing mental health care quality, these findings contribute to a nuanced understanding of patient experiences and underscore the importance of patient participation in mental health care improvement efforts.

BACKGROUND: Cervical cancer is a global disease and it is well established that cervical cancer is caused by human papillomavirus (HPV). In Sweden self-sampling for HPV is now used as a complement to sampling performed by a midwife. However, there is a lack of knowledge on how older women perceive the self-sampling compared to the sampling performed by a midwife. Therefore, the aim of the study was to describe how women, aged 64 years and older, perceived the process of self-sampling and sampling performed by a midwife for HPV-testing.

METHODS: Eighteen women were included in a qualitative interview study, and a phenomenographic approach was used for the analysis of the interviews.

RESULTS: Three descriptive categories emerged: Confidence in sampling, Facilitating participation and Being informed. Within the categories, eight conceptions emerged describing the variation relating to how the women perceived the process of self-sampling and sampling performed by a midwife.

CONCLUSIONS: Women in this study describe confidence in self-sampling for HPV-testing and that the self-sampling was saving time and money, both for themselves and for society. Information in relation to an HPV-positive test result is of importance and it must be kept in mind that women affected by HPV may feel guilt and shame, which health care professionals should pay attention to. This knowledge can be used in education of health care staff.

Many older adults with complex illnesses are today cared for by their next of kin in their own homes and are often sent between different caregivers in public healthcare. Mobile Geriatric Teams (MGTs) are a healthcare initiative for older adults with extensive care needs living at home, coordinated between hospital, primary, and municipal care. The study aims to describe how next of kin experience care efforts from an MGT for their older adult family members. The study has a descriptive qualitative design and uses a phenomenographic approach. Fourteen next of kin to older adult family members who receive efforts from an MGT were interviewed. Two descriptive categories reflecting their experiences emerged: Professional care and No longer having the main responsibility. The study shows that the participants valued that the staff was very competent, that the physician made home visits and could make quick decisions, and that treatments were given at home. They feel that they receive support and experience security and that a burden is lifted from them. Our study shows that through the MGT, next of kin become involved in the care and are relieved of the burden of responsibility of caring for their older family member.

Objective: To investigate the relationship between perceived mental health service provision and quality of life (QoL) as perceived by patients in psychiatric outpatient care.

Methods: A total of 373 adult patients registered at 15 psychiatric outpatient clinics in three regions in central and southern Sweden were included in the study. Survey data were collected using a questionnaire on mental health service provision, symptom severity, recovery, clinical diagnosis, sociodemographics (serving as independent variables) and QoL (serving as the dependent variable). Three aspects of mental health service provision were used: patients’ perceived quality of care, perceived staff-patient interaction, and patient reported psychiatric treatments. Structural equation modelling was used to model the relationship among the variables.

Results: Variables in mental health service provision showed few direct associations with patients’ perceived QoL. Instead, the associations of mental health service provision on QoL were mainly mediated through symptom severity and recovery. These relationships were retained after adjusting for sociodemographic variables and clinical diagnoses. The final model achieved excellent goodness of fit (χ2 = 49.502, p = 0.230, RMSEA = 0.020, CFI = 0.997 and a SRMR = 0.024).

Conclusion: This study shows that mental health service provision is associated with patients’ perceived QoL; however, this association is mostly indirect and mediated by reduced symptom severity and increased recovery. This finding can help inform the design of future interventions to enhance service provision to improve patients’ QoL.

Several municipalities in Sweden organize senior summer camps where older adults can meet and where loneliness and social isolation can be mitigated. Few studies, however, examine how the older adults themselves describe the experience in retrospect and how it might have influenced their daily lives after the stay. This study aims to fill this gap by examining how older adults who participated in a senior summer camp experience the impact the stay has had on their lives. The study has a descriptive qualitative design that uses a phenomenographic approach to explore the variations in the older adults' conceptions of how their participation at the senior summer camp may have affected them. Nineteen older adults aged between 66 and 94 years were interviewed. Three descriptive categories emerge: "Mitigating loneliness," 'Developing as a person' and 'Gaining inspiration.' The study shows that the older adults experience that the stay at the summer camp has had lasting effects on their quality of life. The sense of community at the camp helped them break the experience of loneliness, they improved their self-confidence and gained a positive attitude to life, that it is worth living and that there is much left to experience, regardless of their age.

Patient participation is central in modern health care. However, it is a complex phenomenon that lacks a clear definition, and what constitutes participation varies depending on the context and theoretical perspective. It is known that patient participation in forensic psychiatric care is often rated as low by both patients and professionals, and it can be assumed that interventions to increase it are beneficial. In this process, management and staff could benefit from assessing perceived patient participation, and reliable and valid measurement instruments are essential. The aim of this study was to develop an instrument that could be used to measure experiences of participation in forensic psychiatric care from a patient perspective and test it for content validity. A definition of patient participation in forensic psychiatric care was formulated and operationalized in an instrument that an expert group, consisting of patients with ongoing care, evaluated for content validity. In total, 50 items were sorted into five different dimensions: to have good communication, to be involved, to have mutual trust, to trust the care, and to take responsibility. After psychometric testing, the instrument has the potential to become a tool to use in research, clinical work, and development work in the field of forensic psychiatric care. In addition to being used as a measure, the Patient Participation in Forensic Psychiatric Care can also be used to encourage a dialogue about their care and to make both patients and staff more aware of patient participation.

Introduction: Worldwide efforts to standardize instruments measuring quality in psychiatric care are rare. The international project “Quality in Psychiatric Care” (QPC) is a large research programme aiming at adapting the versions of the QPC instrument for patients and staff to different international settings.

Objectives: The aims were to test the psychometric properties and equivalence of dimensionality of the different language versions of QPC and also to describe and compare the quality of psychiatric out-patient, in-patient, forensic in-patient and psychiatric care across different countries.

Methods: The QPC is a family of instruments based on a definition of quality of psychiatric care from the patients perspective with adapted versions for staff. In this project, we used different language versions in three areas for patient and staff: psychiatric out-patient (QPC-OP/OPS), in-patient (QPC-IP/IPS), and forensic in-patient (QPC-FIP/FIPS).

Results: Patients in out-patient psychiatric care in Brazil rated the quality of care higher than Swedish patients. Comparisons of forensic in-patient care (QPC-FIP/FIPS) patients were more critical of the care they received while staff were generally more positive on the quality of care provided in both Denmark and Sweden. Quality of in-patient care (QPC-IP/IPS) in Spain show staff rating lower quality of care than patients and lowest in the secure environment, which the Swedish staff rated low as well. In Indonesia the patients rated lower quality than staff and lowest in the discharge dimension, followed by the participation dimension. Generally, staff and patients were similar in their perceptions of the low quality of participation. Several studies in Turkey, Indonesia, Spain, Faroe Islands and Norway is ongoing.

Conclusions: The psychometric test and validations of the instrument QPC in different language and country versions will assist countries to compare quality of care, quality improvement and permits benchmarking. Since there are few standardized instruments for measuring quality of care in the psychiatric care, the QPC is expected to make an important contribution to the development in the field.

Disclosure of Interest: None Declared

Introduction: Worldwide efforts to standardize instruments measuring quality in psychiatric care are rare. The international project “Quality in Psychiatric Care” (QPC) is a large research programme aiming at adapting the versions of the QPC instrument for patients and staff to different international settings.

Objectives: The aims were to test the psychometric properties and equivalence of dimensionality of the different language versions of QPC and also to describe and compare the quality of psychiatric out-patient, in-patient, forensic in-patient and psychiatric care across different countries.

Methods: The QPC is a family of instruments based on a definition of quality of psychiatric care from the patients perspective with adapted versions for staff. In this project, we used different language versions in three areas for patient and staff: psychiatric out-patient (QPC-OP/OPS), in-patient (QPC-IP/IPS), and forensic in-patient (QPC-FIP/FIPS).

Results: Patients in out-patient psychiatric care in Brazil rated the quality of care higher than Swedish patients. Comparisons of forensic in-patient care (QPC-FIP/FIPS) patients were more critical of the care they received while staff were generally more positive on the quality of care provided in both Denmark and Sweden. Quality of in-patient care (QPC-IP/IPS) in Spain show staff rating lower quality of care than patients and lowest in the secure environment, which the Swedish staff rated low as well. In Indonesia the patients rated lower quality than staff and lowest in the discharge dimension, followed by the participation dimension. Generally, staff and patients were similar in their perceptions of the low quality of participation. Several studies in Turkey, Indonesia, Spain, Faroe Islands and Norway is ongoing.

Conclusions: The psychometric test and validations of the instrument QPC in different language and country versions will assist countries to compare quality of care, quality improvement and permits benchmarking. Since there are few standardized instruments for measuring quality of care in the psychiatric care, the QPC is expected to make an important contribution to the development in the field.

The current paradigm of mental health care focuses on care provided in the community, increasingly moving away from hospital care models that involve considerable economic burden. Patient and staff perspectives on the quality of psychiatric care can highlight strengths and areas for improvement to ensure better care provision. The aim of this study was to describe and compare perceptions of quality of care among patients and staff in community mental health services and to determine possible relationships between these perceptions and other study variables. A comparative cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted in a sample of 200 patients and 260 staff from community psychiatric care services in the area of Barcelona (Spain). The results showed high overall levels of quality of care from patient (m = 104.35 ± 13.57) and staff (m =102.06 ± 8.80) perspectives. Patients and staff both gave high scores to Encounter and Support factors, while factors concerning patient Participation and Environment received the lowest scores. Continuous assessment of the quality of psychiatric care in the community setting is essential to ensure the highest quality of care, taking the perspectives of those involved into account.

PURPOSE: To describe how patients receiving cancer treatment perceive quality of care in the oncological outpatient settings.

METHOD: A strategic sample of 20 adult patients with cancer treated in four oncological outpatient settings in four hospitals in Sweden participated in the study. Participants were interviewed using a semi-structured interview guide with open-ended questions. The interviews were audio-recorded, and the transcripts were analysed using a phenomenographic approach.

RESULTS: Three descriptive categories emerged from the data: The patient's care is designed to meet individual needs, The patient's dignity is respected, and The patient feels safe and secure with the care. Overall, quality of care in the oncological outpatient setting is perceived as something positive and described in normative terms by the participants.

CONCLUSION: The results emphasises that in order to achieve quality of care it is important to the patients that they are able to meet with the same well-educated, professional, caring and sensible health care professionals every time.