oru.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Component selection in Software Engineering: Which attributes are the most important in the decision process?
Software Research Engineering Lab (SERL), Blekinge Institute of Technology, Karlskrona, Sweden.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-0311-1502
Software Research Engineering Lab (SERL), Blekinge Institute of Technology, Karlskrona, Sweden.
RISE SICS AB, Lund, Sweden.
RISE SICS AB, Lund, Sweden.
Show others and affiliations
2018 (English)In: 44th Euromicro Conference on Software Engineering and Advanced Applications, SEAA 2018: Proceedings / [ed] Bures, T; Angelis, L, IEEE conference proceedings , 2018, p. 198-205Conference paper, Published paper (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

Component-based software engineering is a common approach to develop and evolve contemporary software systems where different component sourcing options are available: 1)Software developed internally (in-house), 2)Software developed outsourced, 3)Commercial of the shelf software, and 4) Open Source Software.

However, there is little available research on what attributes of a component are the most important ones when selecting new components. The object of the present study is to investigate what matters the most to industry practitioners during component selection. We conducted a cross-domain anonymous survey with industry practitioners involved in component selection. First, the practitioners selected the most important attributes from a list. Next, they prioritized their selection using the Hundred-Dollar ($100) test. We analyzed the results using Compositional Data Analysis. The descriptive results showed that Cost was clearly considered the most important attribute during the component selection. Other important attributes for the practitioners were: Support of the component, Longevity prediction, and Level of off-the-shelf fit to product. Next, an exploratory analysis was conducted based on the practitioners' inherent characteristics. Nonparametric tests and biplots were used. It seems that smaller organizations and more immature products focus on different attributes than bigger organizations and mature products which focus more on Cost.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
IEEE conference proceedings , 2018. p. 198-205
Series
EUROMICRO Conference Proceedings, ISSN 1089-6503
Keywords [en]
Component-based software engineering, Decision making, Compositional Data Analysis, Cumulative voting
National Category
Software Engineering Other Electrical Engineering, Electronic Engineering, Information Engineering
Research subject
Informatics; Information technology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-72568DOI: 10.1109/SEAA.2018.00039ISI: 000450238900030Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85057178973ISBN: 978-1-5386-7383-6 (electronic)OAI: oai:DiVA.org:oru-72568DiVA, id: diva2:1289952
Conference
44th Euromicro Conference on Software Engineering and Advanced Applications (SEAA 2018), Prague, Czech Republic, August 29-31, 2018
Funder
Knowledge Foundation, 20140218Available from: 2019-02-19 Created: 2019-02-19 Last updated: 2019-02-21Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records BETA

Chatzipetrou, PanagiotaAlégroth, EmilGorschek, TonyWnuk, Krzysztof

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Chatzipetrou, PanagiotaAlégroth, EmilGorschek, TonyWnuk, Krzysztof
Software EngineeringOther Electrical Engineering, Electronic Engineering, Information Engineering

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
isbn
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
isbn
urn-nbn
Total: 86 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf