oru.sePublikasjoner
Endre søk
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Development of a questionnaire to measure patient-reported postoperative recovery: content validity and intra-patient reliability
Örebro universitet, Institutionen för klinisk medicin.
Örebro universitet, Institutionen för vårdvetenskap och omsorg.
Örebro universitet, Institutionen för klinisk medicin.
Örebro universitet, Handelshögskolan vid Örebro universitet.ORCID-id: 0000-0001-7210-1925
Vise andre og tillknytning
2009 (engelsk)Inngår i: Journal of Evaluation In Clinical Practice, ISSN 1356-1294, E-ISSN 1365-2753, Vol. 15, nr 3, s. 411-419Artikkel i tidsskrift (Fagfellevurdert) Published
Abstract [en]

Aims and objectives. In this study we describe the development of a short, easy-to-use questionnaire to measure postoperative recovery and evaluate its content validity and intra-patient reliability.   The questionnaire is designed to evaluate the progress of postoperative recovery and the long-term follow-up of possible effects of interventions during recovery.

Method. The study involved four steps. 1) A conceptualisation and item definitions were based on a theoretical framework and a description of patients' postoperative recovery from the perspective of patients, registered nurses and surgeons. 2) Content validity of items was tested through expert judgements. 3) A test run of the questionnaire was performed to confirm its feasibility and workload requirement. 4) The stability of the questionnaire was evaluated through intra-patient reliability assessment.

Results. As a result of the operationalisation process of the concept postoperative recovery, five dimensions (physical symptoms, physical functions, psychological, social, activity) and 19 items were identified. Each item was formulated as a statement in the questionnaire. Content validity was judged to be high. After the pre-test of the questionnaire a revision with refinements in the layout was made. The vast majority of items showed a high level of intra-patient reliability.

Conclusion. Based on a theoretical framework and empirical data, we developed a short and easy-to-use tentative questionnaire to measure patient-reported postoperative recovery. Initial support for content validity was established. The vast majority of items showed a high level of test-retest reliability.

sted, utgiver, år, opplag, sider
Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd , 2009. Vol. 15, nr 3, s. 411-419
HSV kategori
Forskningsprogram
Kirurgi
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-8081DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2008.01027.xISI: 000266425900002OAI: oai:DiVA.org:oru-8081DiVA, id: diva2:241636
Merknad

Part of thesis: http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-7731

Tilgjengelig fra: 2009-10-05 Laget: 2009-10-05 Sist oppdatert: 2019-04-03bibliografisk kontrollert
Inngår i avhandling
1. Postoperative recovery: development of a multi-dimensional questionnaire for assessment of Recovery
Åpne denne publikasjonen i ny fane eller vindu >>Postoperative recovery: development of a multi-dimensional questionnaire for assessment of Recovery
2009 (engelsk)Doktoravhandling, med artikler (Annet vitenskapelig)
Abstract [en]

This thesis aims to present a multi-dimensional instrument for self-assessment of progress in postoperative recovery. The author employs different research paradigms and methodologies to achieve this aim.

Walker and Avant’s approach to concept analysis was used to examine the basic elements of postoperative recovery (Study I). The analysis identified different recovery dimensions and developed a theoretical definition showing postoperative recovery to be an energy-requiring process of returning to normality and wholeness, defined by comparative standards.

Fourteen patients and 28 staff members participated in individual and focus group interviews aimed at describing patient and staff experiences of patient recovery (Study II). The essence of the postoperative recovery process was described as a desire to decrease unpleasant physical symptoms, reach a level of emotional wellbeing, regain functions, and re-establish activities.

In Study III, 5 dimensions and 19 items were identified as a part of the operationalization process of the concept postoperative recovery. Fifteen staff members and 16 patients participated in the evaluation of content validity. On average, 85% of the participants considered the items as essential to the recovery process. In a test run of the questionnaire, 14 of 15 patients considered the questionnaire to be easy to understand and easy to complete. Twenty-five patients participated in the evaluation of intra-patient reliability. Percentage agreement (PA), systematic disagreement (RP, RC), and individual variability (RV) between the two assessments were calculated. PA measures ranged from 72% to 100%. The observed disagreement could be explained mainly by systematic disagreement.

In total, 158 patients participated in the evaluation of construct validity, the ability to discriminate between groups, and the investigation of important item variables (Study IV). A rank-based statistical method for evaluation of paired, ordered categorical data from rating scales was used to evaluate consistency between the assessments of the Postoperative Recovery Profile (PRP) questionnaire and a global recovery scale. The number of months needed by participants to be regarded as fully recovered was studied by means of recovery profiles displayed by the cumulative proportion of recovered participants over time. A ranking list based on the participant’s appraisal of the five most important item variables in the PRP questionnaire was compiled to illustrate the rank ordering of the items. In comparing the assessments from the PRP questionnaire and the global recovery scale, 7.6% of all possible pairs were disordered. Twelve months after discharge 73% in the orthopaedic group were regarded as fully recovered, compared to 51% of the participants in the abdominal group (95% CI: 6% to 40%). The pain variable appeared among the top five most important items on eight measurement occasions, of eight possible, in both study groups.

In conclusion, the PRP questionnaire was developed and support was given for validity and reliability. The questionnaire enables one to evaluate progress in postoperative recovery.

sted, utgiver, år, opplag, sider
Örebro: Örebro universitet, 2009. s. 73
Serie
Örebro Studies in Medicine, ISSN 1652-4063 ; 32
Emneord
Concept analysis, experiences, postoperative recovery, questionnaire, recovery profile, reliability, validity
HSV kategori
Forskningsprogram
Kirurgi
Identifikatorer
urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-7731 (URN)978-91-7668-678-2 (ISBN)
Disputas
2009-09-25, Wilandersalen, Universitetssjukhuset, Örebro, 13:00 (svensk)
Opponent
Veileder
Tilgjengelig fra: 2009-08-25 Laget: 2009-08-25 Sist oppdatert: 2017-10-18bibliografisk kontrollert

Open Access i DiVA

fulltekst(231 kB)1873 nedlastinger
Filinformasjon
Fil FULLTEXT01.pdfFilstørrelse 231 kBChecksum SHA-512
990b54419d2e7e5d086c9c40973b9c336d82e4a281ba0771c3bf38b1e64e40592c7f18f3034a438d5bbbaddf417784bb7576815e18bdfb874097f643f3474475
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Andre lenker

Forlagets fulltekst

Personposter BETA

Allvin, RenéeEhnfors, MargaretaRawal, NarinderSvensson, Elisabeth

Søk i DiVA

Av forfatter/redaktør
Allvin, RenéeEhnfors, MargaretaRawal, NarinderSvensson, Elisabeth
Av organisasjonen
I samme tidsskrift
Journal of Evaluation In Clinical Practice

Søk utenfor DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Totalt: 1873 nedlastinger
Antall nedlastinger er summen av alle nedlastinger av alle fulltekster. Det kan for eksempel være tidligere versjoner som er ikke lenger tilgjengelige

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric

doi
urn-nbn
Totalt: 551 treff
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf