oru.sePublikasjoner
Endre søk
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Validity and test-retest reliability of the six-spot step test in persons after stroke
Örebro universitet, Institutionen för hälsovetenskaper. University Health Care Research Centre, Region Örebro County, Örebro, Sweden.
Örebro universitet, Institutionen för hälsovetenskaper. Region Örebro län. University Health Care Research Centre, Region Örebro County, Örebro, Sweden; Faculty of Health, Science, and Technology, Department of Health Sciences, Nursing, Karlstad University, Karlstad, Sweden.ORCID-id: 0000-0001-7352-8234
Faculty of Health, Science, and Technology, Department of Health Sciences, Nursing, Karlstad University, Karlstad, Sweden.
Örebro universitet, Institutionen för hälsovetenskaper. Region Örebro län.ORCID-id: 0000-0002-6768-5740
2018 (engelsk)Inngår i: Physiotherapy Theory and Practice, ISSN 0959-3985, E-ISSN 1532-5040Artikkel i tidsskrift (Fagfellevurdert) Epub ahead of print
Abstract [en]

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: After stroke, asymmetric weight distribution is common with decreased balance control in standing and walking. The six-spot step test (SSST) includes a 5-m walk during which one leg shoves wooden blocks out of circles marked on the floor, thus assessing the ability to take load on each leg. The aim of the present study was to investigate the convergent and discriminant validity and test-retest reliability of the SSST in persons with stroke.

METHODS: Eighty-one participants were included. A cross-sectional study was performed, in which the SSST was conducted twice, 3-7 days apart. Validity was investigated using measures of dynamic balance and walking. Reliability was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficient, standard error of the measurement (SEM), and smallest real difference (SRD).

RESULTS: The convergent validity was strong to moderate, and the test-retest reliability was good. The SEM% was 14.7%, and the SRD% was 40.8% based on the mean of four walks shoving twice with the paretic and twice with the non-paretic leg.

CONCLUSION: Values on random measurement error were high affecting the use of the SSST for follow-up evaluations but the SSST can be a complementary measure of gait and balance.

sted, utgiver, år, opplag, sider
Taylor & Francis, 2018.
Emneord [en]
Balance, reliability, stroke, validity
HSV kategori
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-67220DOI: 10.1080/09593985.2018.1482511PubMedID: 29873590OAI: oai:DiVA.org:oru-67220DiVA, id: diva2:1216342
Tilgjengelig fra: 2018-06-11 Laget: 2018-06-11 Sist oppdatert: 2018-09-14bibliografisk kontrollert

Open Access i DiVA

Fulltekst mangler i DiVA

Andre lenker

Forlagets fulltekstPubMed

Personposter BETA

Arvidsson Lindvall, MialinnAnderzen-Carlsson, AgnetaForsberg, Anette

Søk i DiVA

Av forfatter/redaktør
Arvidsson Lindvall, MialinnAnderzen-Carlsson, AgnetaForsberg, Anette
Av organisasjonen
I samme tidsskrift
Physiotherapy Theory and Practice

Søk utenfor DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Totalt: 129 treff
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf