To Örebro University

oru.seÖrebro universitets publikasjoner
Endre søk
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Treatment of Urethral Pain Syndrome (UPS) in Sweden
Department of Women´s and Children´s Health, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Department of Women´s and Children´s Health, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Department of Women´s and Children´s Health, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Örebro universitet, Institutionen för medicinska vetenskaper. Region Örebro län. Department of Women´s and Children´s Health, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden; Center for Clinical Research Dalarna, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden; Clinical Research Center, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden; .ORCID-id: 0000-0002-7407-9642
2019 (engelsk)Inngår i: PLOS ONE, E-ISSN 1932-6203, Vol. 14, nr 11, artikkel-id e0225404Artikkel i tidsskrift (Fagfellevurdert) Published
Abstract [en]

BACKGROUND: Urethral Pain Syndrome (UPS) in women is a recurrent urethral pain without any proven infection or other obvious pathology. There are few studies on UPS, and evidence-based treatment is lacking. The primary aim was to study what treatments are used, and to compare the treatment tradition of UPS in Sweden in 2018, with what was used in 2006.

METHODS: A questionnaire on the treatment of women with UPS was sent to all public gynecology, urology, gynecologic oncology and venereology clinics, and one public general practice in each county in Sweden in 2018. Private practice clinics in gynecology responded to the survey in 2017. Comparisons were made with the same survey sent to gynecology and urology clinics in 2006.

FINDINGS: Of 137 invited clinics in 2018, 99 (72.3%) responded to the survey. Seventy-seven (77.8%) of them saw women with UPS and 79.2% (61/77) of these clinics treated the patients using 19 different treatment methods. Local corticosteroids and local estrogens were the methods most used. Treatments were similar in gynecology and urology clinics in 2006 and 2018, although strong corticosteroids had increased in use in the treatment regimens of 2018. More than half of the clinics used antibiotics.

INTERPRETATION: Since there is no evidence-based treatment of UPS, a wide spectrum of treatments is used, and different specialties use different treatment strategies. Despite the lack of proven infection, a large number of clinics also treated the syndrome with antibiotics. There is thus a need for well-designed randomized controlled clinical trials to find evidence-based treatments of UPS.

sted, utgiver, år, opplag, sider
Public Library of Science , 2019. Vol. 14, nr 11, artikkel-id e0225404
HSV kategori
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-78053DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0225404ISI: 000533889300025PubMedID: 31756195Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85075437935OAI: oai:DiVA.org:oru-78053DiVA, id: diva2:1372551
Merknad

Funding Agency:

Center for Clinical Research Dalarna, Sweden  CKFUU-797291

Tilgjengelig fra: 2019-11-25 Laget: 2019-11-25 Sist oppdatert: 2025-02-18bibliografisk kontrollert

Open Access i DiVA

Fulltekst mangler i DiVA

Andre lenker

Forlagets fulltekstPubMedScopus

Person

Lindström, Annika K.

Søk i DiVA

Av forfatter/redaktør
Lindström, Annika K.
Av organisasjonen
I samme tidsskrift
PLOS ONE

Søk utenfor DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Totalt: 211 treff
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf