oru.sePublikasjoner
Endre søk
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Forest nitrogen fertilisation
Örebro universitet, Institutionen för naturvetenskap.
Örebro universitet, Institutionen för samhällsvetenskap.ORCID-id: 0000-0001-6735-0011
(engelsk)Manuskript (preprint) (Annet vitenskapelig)
HSV kategori
Forskningsprogram
Miljövetenskap
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-15930OAI: oai:DiVA.org:oru-15930DiVA, id: diva2:423338
Tilgjengelig fra: 2011-06-15 Laget: 2011-06-15 Sist oppdatert: 2017-10-17bibliografisk kontrollert
Inngår i avhandling
1. Theoretical disputes and practical environmental dilemmas: an interdisciplinary study
Åpne denne publikasjonen i ny fane eller vindu >>Theoretical disputes and practical environmental dilemmas: an interdisciplinary study
2002 (engelsk)Doktoravhandling, med artikler (Annet vitenskapelig)
Abstract [en]

The aim of this thesis is to analyse the scientific basis for diverging recommendations in environmental management. A further aim of this study is to discuss the links and interactions between disciplines related to science of environmental issues, and between natural science and practice in dealing with environmental management and ecological sustainability. The question at issue was whether ontological (how the world is constituted) and epistemological (how achieve knowledge about the world) differences between disciplines lead to opposing conclusions. Scientific disputes were selected systematically to examine and analyse the theoretical characteristics and reasons of these disputes. Two case studies were selected: forest nitrogen fertilisation and constructed wetlands. Content analysis was used to study the theoretical content of and the reasons for the disputes within these two scientific areas. Research articles published in peer-reviewed journals, conference proceedings, and publications in anthologies were chosen as the empirical material.

 

The results show that theoretical disputes arise from the diversity of disciplines and fragmentation of theoretical frameworks. The conclusions are that one way to overcome scientific disputes and achieve common knowledge and solutions to environmental problems is to identify and compare values and principles of the different scientific research traditions.

sted, utgiver, år, opplag, sider
Örebro: Örebro universitetsbibliotek, 2002. s. 80
Serie
Örebro Studies in Environmental Science, ISSN 1650-6278 ; 3
Emneord
sustainable development, natural science, theoretical disputes, forest nitrogen fertilisation, constructed wetlands, content analysis
HSV kategori
Forskningsprogram
Miljövetenskap
Identifikatorer
urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-39 (URN)91-7668-319-2 (ISBN)
Disputas
2002-12-06, Hörsal D, Örebro universitet, Örebro, 10:15 (engelsk)
Opponent
Veileder
Tilgjengelig fra: 2002-12-06 Laget: 2002-12-06 Sist oppdatert: 2017-10-18bibliografisk kontrollert

Open Access i DiVA

Fulltekst mangler i DiVA

Personposter BETA

Lidskog, Rolf

Søk i DiVA

Av forfatter/redaktør
Lidskog, Rolf
Av organisasjonen

Søk utenfor DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

urn-nbn

Altmetric

urn-nbn
Totalt: 369 treff
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf