oru.sePublikasjoner
Endre søk
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Acknowledging risk, trusting expertise, and coping with uncertainty: citizens' deliberations on spraying an insect population
Örebro universitet, Institutionen för humaniora, utbildnings- och samhällsvetenskap.ORCID-id: 0000-0002-1495-8346
Örebro universitet, Institutionen för humaniora, utbildnings- och samhällsvetenskap. (Centre for Urban and Regional Studies (CUReS))ORCID-id: 0000-0001-6735-0011
2012 (engelsk)Inngår i: Society & Natural Resources, ISSN 0894-1920, E-ISSN 1521-0723, Vol. 25, nr 6, s. 587-601Artikkel i tidsskrift (Fagfellevurdert) Published
Abstract [en]

The basis for this article is the growing interest in understanding how the public evaluates risk issues. The empirical case consists of an interview study of residents in an area that has experienced an outbreak of moths that has become a nuisance to humans. The study focuses on the narratives created by the residents to make sense of the situation, the risks they associated with regulatory options, and how these narratives relate to expert opinions of the problem. The analysis shows that the residents criticize specific experts and knowledge claims. This is done, however, without questioning science as such; there is still a belief among the residents that science is an institution that generally produces valid knowledge. The analysis also shows that citizen knowledge does not merely passively reflect science. Instead, citizens create meaning and construct knowledge by organizing personal experiences and knowledge claims into coherent narratives.

sted, utgiver, år, opplag, sider
Taylor & Francis, 2012. Vol. 25, nr 6, s. 587-601
Emneord [en]
biodiversity, narrative, public trust, public understanding of science, risk, spraying
HSV kategori
Forskningsprogram
Sociologi
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-23368DOI: 10.1080/08941920.2011.620598ISI: 000304064100005Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-84859627301OAI: oai:DiVA.org:oru-23368DiVA, id: diva2:532325
Tilgjengelig fra: 2012-06-11 Laget: 2012-06-11 Sist oppdatert: 2017-12-07bibliografisk kontrollert
Inngår i avhandling
1. The importance of trust.: a study of knowledge production of biodiversity.
Åpne denne publikasjonen i ny fane eller vindu >>The importance of trust.: a study of knowledge production of biodiversity.
2013 (engelsk)Doktoravhandling, med artikler (Annet vitenskapelig)
Abstract [en]

The loss of biological diversity is one of today’s greatest environmental problems. Scientific knowledge is typically presented as the premise to solve this problem. However, science alone is not sufficient to produce knowledge of biodiversity. Other actors are also involved in knowledge production. The aim of this thesis is to analyse how different actors create knowledge of the environmental problem of biodiversity loss and to further investigate the importance of trust in the relationships between these knowledge producers.

This thesis uses a discourse analytical perspective and conducts interviews and document studies to explore how actors use different narratives to legitimate their knowledge production. Through four papers addressing different aspects of knowledge production, this thesis discusses conditions for knowledge production, particularly the importance of trust.

The results show that actors other than scientific experts also have the ability to act in knowledgeable ways and to be involved in knowledge production of biodiversity. Knowledge is produced by making use of many different dimensions and aspects, such as global, regional, local, and science, politics, and everyday life. The result also shows how trust, distrust, and as-if trust are key activities in knowledge production of environmental problems, such as the loss of biodiversity.

This thesis argues that the actors involved need to realise and acknowledge that knowledge production is a mutual process in which actors must engage in trust and distrust activities. In so doing, it will be possible to understand the complexity of the loss of biodiversity and thus to better manage this problem.

sted, utgiver, år, opplag, sider
Örebro: Örebro University, 2013. s. 94
Serie
Örebro Studies in Sociology, ISSN 1650-2531 ; 16
Emneord
trust, knowledge, biological diversity, biodiversity, environmental problems, discourse analysis, Mode-1/Mode-2, SSK, STS
HSV kategori
Forskningsprogram
Sociologi
Identifikatorer
urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-32291 (URN)978-91-7668-969-1 (ISBN)
Disputas
2013-11-08, Örebro, 21:09 (svensk)
Opponent
Veileder
Tilgjengelig fra: 2013-11-15 Laget: 2013-11-09 Sist oppdatert: 2017-10-17bibliografisk kontrollert

Open Access i DiVA

Fulltekst mangler i DiVA

Andre lenker

Forlagets fulltekstScopus

Personposter BETA

Gustafsson, KarinLidskog, Rolf

Søk i DiVA

Av forfatter/redaktør
Gustafsson, KarinLidskog, Rolf
Av organisasjonen
I samme tidsskrift
Society & Natural Resources

Søk utenfor DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric

doi
urn-nbn
Totalt: 532 treff
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf