oru.sePublikasjoner
Endre søk
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
The importance of trust.: a study of knowledge production of biodiversity.
Örebro universitet, Institutionen för humaniora, utbildnings- och samhällsvetenskap.ORCID-id: 0000-0002-1495-8346
2013 (engelsk)Doktoravhandling, med artikler (Annet vitenskapelig)
Abstract [en]

The loss of biological diversity is one of today’s greatest environmental problems. Scientific knowledge is typically presented as the premise to solve this problem. However, science alone is not sufficient to produce knowledge of biodiversity. Other actors are also involved in knowledge production. The aim of this thesis is to analyse how different actors create knowledge of the environmental problem of biodiversity loss and to further investigate the importance of trust in the relationships between these knowledge producers.

This thesis uses a discourse analytical perspective and conducts interviews and document studies to explore how actors use different narratives to legitimate their knowledge production. Through four papers addressing different aspects of knowledge production, this thesis discusses conditions for knowledge production, particularly the importance of trust.

The results show that actors other than scientific experts also have the ability to act in knowledgeable ways and to be involved in knowledge production of biodiversity. Knowledge is produced by making use of many different dimensions and aspects, such as global, regional, local, and science, politics, and everyday life. The result also shows how trust, distrust, and as-if trust are key activities in knowledge production of environmental problems, such as the loss of biodiversity.

This thesis argues that the actors involved need to realise and acknowledge that knowledge production is a mutual process in which actors must engage in trust and distrust activities. In so doing, it will be possible to understand the complexity of the loss of biodiversity and thus to better manage this problem.

sted, utgiver, år, opplag, sider
Örebro: Örebro University , 2013. , s. 94
Serie
Örebro Studies in Sociology, ISSN 1650-2531 ; 16
Emneord [en]
trust, knowledge, biological diversity, biodiversity, environmental problems, discourse analysis, Mode-1/Mode-2, SSK, STS
HSV kategori
Forskningsprogram
Sociologi
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-32291ISBN: 978-91-7668-969-1 (tryckt)OAI: oai:DiVA.org:oru-32291DiVA, id: diva2:663259
Disputas
2013-11-08, Örebro, 21:09 (svensk)
Opponent
Veileder
Tilgjengelig fra: 2013-11-15 Laget: 2013-11-09 Sist oppdatert: 2017-10-17bibliografisk kontrollert
Delarbeid
1. Acknowledging risk, trusting expertise, and coping with uncertainty: citizens' deliberations on spraying an insect population
Åpne denne publikasjonen i ny fane eller vindu >>Acknowledging risk, trusting expertise, and coping with uncertainty: citizens' deliberations on spraying an insect population
2012 (engelsk)Inngår i: Society & Natural Resources, ISSN 0894-1920, E-ISSN 1521-0723, Vol. 25, nr 6, s. 587-601Artikkel i tidsskrift (Fagfellevurdert) Published
Abstract [en]

The basis for this article is the growing interest in understanding how the public evaluates risk issues. The empirical case consists of an interview study of residents in an area that has experienced an outbreak of moths that has become a nuisance to humans. The study focuses on the narratives created by the residents to make sense of the situation, the risks they associated with regulatory options, and how these narratives relate to expert opinions of the problem. The analysis shows that the residents criticize specific experts and knowledge claims. This is done, however, without questioning science as such; there is still a belief among the residents that science is an institution that generally produces valid knowledge. The analysis also shows that citizen knowledge does not merely passively reflect science. Instead, citizens create meaning and construct knowledge by organizing personal experiences and knowledge claims into coherent narratives.

sted, utgiver, år, opplag, sider
Taylor & Francis, 2012
Emneord
biodiversity, narrative, public trust, public understanding of science, risk, spraying
HSV kategori
Forskningsprogram
Sociologi
Identifikatorer
urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-23368 (URN)10.1080/08941920.2011.620598 (DOI)000304064100005 ()2-s2.0-84859627301 (Scopus ID)
Tilgjengelig fra: 2012-06-11 Laget: 2012-06-11 Sist oppdatert: 2017-12-07bibliografisk kontrollert
2. Made in conflict: local residents' construction of a local environmental problem
Åpne denne publikasjonen i ny fane eller vindu >>Made in conflict: local residents' construction of a local environmental problem
2011 (engelsk)Inngår i: Local Environment: the International Journal of Justice and Sustainability, ISSN 1354-9839, E-ISSN 1469-6711, Vol. 16, nr 7, s. 655-670Artikkel i tidsskrift (Fagfellevurdert) Published
Abstract [en]

The aim of this paper is to understand how local residents participate in the construction of local environmental problems and to evaluate a particular analytical approach in environmental sociology to study this phenomenon. The paper is based on an interview study with a sample of local residents. The analysis demonstrates how the local residents attempt to construct a local environmental problem. In particular, the study focuses on how involved actors are positioned, how different sorts of knowledge claims are used, and how the neglect the residents perceive from the authorities affects the attempt to construct a local environmental problem. The study shows that the local residents play a central role in the construction of the situation and that the evaluated model could be very helpful as an analytical tool in the investigation of local residents' participation in the construction of environmental problems.

Emneord
environmental problem, environmental knowledge, local residents, social constructionism, narrative, pine processionary moth
HSV kategori
Forskningsprogram
Sociologi
Identifikatorer
urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-16483 (URN)10.1080/13549839.2011.589431 (DOI)
Tilgjengelig fra: 2011-08-09 Laget: 2011-08-09 Sist oppdatert: 2019-03-05bibliografisk kontrollert
3. Environmental discourses and biodiversity: the construction of a storyline in understanding and managing an environmental issue
Åpne denne publikasjonen i ny fane eller vindu >>Environmental discourses and biodiversity: the construction of a storyline in understanding and managing an environmental issue
2013 (engelsk)Inngår i: Journal of Integrative Environmental Sciences, ISSN 1943-815X, E-ISSN 1943-8168, Vol. 10, nr 1, s. 39-54Artikkel i tidsskrift (Fagfellevurdert) Published
Abstract [en]

Although biodiversity is considered to be one of today’s greatest environmental challenges, its definition remains open to interpretation. How biodiversity is understood and managed depends on the environmental discourses within which it is articulated. This paper examines how the Swedish Society for Nature Conservation (SSNC), one of the largest environmental NGOs in Sweden, describes biodiversity in its 2011 yearbook. The yearbook is aimed at a wide audience and is intended to improve the general public’s understanding of biodiversity. Using discourse analysis, this study shows how the SSNC defines biodiversity by re-articulating three environmental discourses and integrating them into a single storyline. The analysis shows how these discourses offer different possibilities for different subject positions to speak about and act in relation to biodiversity. Finally, the study shows how normative implications for action are articulated as consequences of these definitions and who is responsible for performing these actions.

sted, utgiver, år, opplag, sider
Taylor & Francis, 2013
Emneord
biodiversity, environmental discourse, subject position, storyline, discourse analysis, environmental NGO
HSV kategori
Forskningsprogram
Sociologi
Identifikatorer
urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-30152 (URN)10.1080/1943815X.2013.769455 (DOI)000316012700003 ()2-s2.0-84875216572 (Scopus ID)
Tilgjengelig fra: 2013-08-08 Laget: 2013-08-08 Sist oppdatert: 2017-12-06bibliografisk kontrollert
4. Boundary work, hybrid practices and portable representations: an analysis of global and national co-productions of Red Lists
Åpne denne publikasjonen i ny fane eller vindu >>Boundary work, hybrid practices and portable representations: an analysis of global and national co-productions of Red Lists
2013 (engelsk)Inngår i: Nature and Culture, ISSN 1558-6073, E-ISSN 1558-5468, Vol. 8, nr 1, s. 30-52Artikkel i tidsskrift (Fagfellevurdert) Published
Abstract [en]

For many countries, the IUCN Red List of threatened species is a central instrument in their work to counteract loss of biodiversity. This article analyzes the development of the Red List categories and criteria, how these categories and criteria are used in the construction of global, national, and regional red lists, and how the red lists are employed in policy work. A central finding of the article is that this mix of actors implies many different forms of boundary work. This article also finds that the Red List functions as a portable representation, that is, a context-independent instrument to represent nature. A third finding is that the Red List functions as a link between experts and policy makers. Thus, the Red List is best understood as a boundary object and hybrid practice where the credibility of scientific assessment and a specific policy is mutually strengthened

sted, utgiver, år, opplag, sider
Berghahn Journals, 2013
Emneord
Portable presentation, hybrid practices, co-production, boundary work, Red List
HSV kategori
Forskningsprogram
Sociologi
Identifikatorer
urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-24146 (URN)10.3167/nc.2013.080103 (DOI)000317804900003 ()2-s2.0-84876340533 (Scopus ID)
Forskningsfinansiär
Swedish Research Council Formas
Tilgjengelig fra: 2012-07-19 Laget: 2012-07-19 Sist oppdatert: 2017-12-07bibliografisk kontrollert

Open Access i DiVA

sammanfattning(533 kB)411 nedlastinger
Filinformasjon
Fil SUMMARY01.pdfFilstørrelse 533 kBChecksum SHA-512
89fce37781ad6ff7f183ea68c0ed3a7e30858b3bc5cc39840a60f474e49ce75e88c3421e201216fc55432a2c0dbd81922be91c3ee00e66171de2b1cf7855d0e9
Type summaryMimetype application/pdf
omslag(1527 kB)101 nedlastinger
Filinformasjon
Fil COVER01.pdfFilstørrelse 1527 kBChecksum SHA-512
df23db036226c4edd3cf9d7cac007410371c191c9e36376049a71040c3855fa1e9c3b9be4123654dd2fa0692c6bf6b873d601a37114e5ed044b9ea4d2276c60f
Type coverMimetype application/pdf
spikblad(134 kB)40 nedlastinger
Filinformasjon
Fil SPIKBLAD01.pdfFilstørrelse 134 kBChecksum SHA-512
51cd47f7852d0f77edb44b1a4554e464103e4f797b5b96762fdfd508e0ca2f21a0bb87c8aaac06413d642b636a0cd1367000b83f2feaf30c10d33b6a325a4a46
Type spikbladMimetype application/pdf

Personposter BETA

Gustafsson, Karin M

Søk i DiVA

Av forfatter/redaktør
Gustafsson, Karin M
Av organisasjonen

Søk utenfor DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Antall nedlastinger er summen av alle nedlastinger av alle fulltekster. Det kan for eksempel være tidligere versjoner som er ikke lenger tilgjengelige

isbn
urn-nbn

Altmetric

isbn
urn-nbn
Totalt: 1469 treff
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf