oru.sePublikasjoner
Endre søk
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Det motsägelsefulla arbetet med jämställdhetsintegrering
Örebro universitet, Institutionen för humaniora, utbildnings- och samhällsvetenskap. (Centrum för feministiska samhällsstudier(CFS))
Örebro universitet, Institutionen för humaniora, utbildnings- och samhällsvetenskap. (Centrum för feministiska samhällsstudier(CFS))
2011 (svensk)Inngår i: Tidskrift för Genusvetenskap, ISSN 1654-5443, E-ISSN 2001-1377, nr 2-3, s. 81-96Artikkel i tidsskrift (Fagfellevurdert) Published
Abstract [en]

This article discusses how the actors involved with integrating a gender perspective into mainstream organizational processes have to deal with many difficult-to-solve questions or dilemmas in their everyday work. The strategies used to implement gender mainstreaming rests on various and often contradictory understandings of gender, gender equality and change strategies. The article draws on two case studies in public organizations working with gender mainstreaming where qualitative interviews and reflection- and analysis- and reflection seminars have been conducted with actors involved in the project. The main aim of the article is to discuss an interactive research approach as a way to reflect on various understandings and underlying assumptions that different change strategies are based on. Theoretically the paper uses Michael Billig’s concept of ideological dilemmas as well as theories on gender equality, organizational change and interactive research. A central argument is that contradictions can be problematic if they are ignored but fruitful if used as a starting point for discussions about how future change strategies can be formed. Julia Nentwich’s notion of “playing around” is discussed as a way to reflect and develop strategies based on the specific dilemmas found in the cases studies. Different phases in the interactive approach is described and discussed; the problem orientation phase, the examination phase and the analysis- and reflection phase.

sted, utgiver, år, opplag, sider
2011. nr 2-3, s. 81-96
Emneord [en]
gender mainstreaming, ideological dilemmas, interactive research, public organizations, organizational change
HSV kategori
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-44132OAI: oai:DiVA.org:oru-44132DiVA, id: diva2:801125
Tilgjengelig fra: 2011-11-28 Laget: 2015-04-08 Sist oppdatert: 2017-12-04bibliografisk kontrollert

Open Access i DiVA

Fulltekst mangler i DiVA

Andre lenker

PDF

Personposter BETA

Callerstig, Anne CharlottLindholm, Kristina

Søk i DiVA

Av forfatter/redaktør
Callerstig, Anne CharlottLindholm, Kristina
Av organisasjonen
I samme tidsskrift
Tidskrift för Genusvetenskap

Søk utenfor DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

urn-nbn

Altmetric

urn-nbn
Totalt: 681 treff
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf