oru.sePublikasjoner
Endre søk
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Impact of changing positively worded items to negatively worded items in the Swedish web‐version of the Quality of Recovery (SwQoR) questionnaire
Örebro universitet, Institutionen för hälsovetenskaper. (Perioperativ omvårdnad)ORCID-id: 0000-0001-7574-6745
Örebro universitet, Institutionen för hälsovetenskaper. (Perioperativ omvårdnad)ORCID-id: 0000-0001-5403-4183
2017 (engelsk)Inngår i: Journal of Evaluation In Clinical Practice, ISSN 1356-1294, E-ISSN 1365-2753, Vol. 23, nr 3, s. 502-507Artikkel i tidsskrift (Fagfellevurdert) Published
Abstract [en]

Rationale, aims, and objectives: The Swedish web-version of the Quality of Recovery questionnaire is used to evaluate a person's postoperative recovery after anesthesia and surgery. An earlier study found an increased risk of answering incorrectly when the questionnaire included both positive and negative items. Therefore, this study investigated the effect of changing positively worded items to negatively worded items.

Methods: This was a cross-sectional study including 90 second-year nursing students. Seven pairs of positively and negatively worded items were evaluated for differences in response as well as agreement between the items.

Results: Two pairs of items showed higher mean values if the item was negatively worded. Between-item agreement for positively worded item scores and their corresponding reverse-coded negatively worded item scores was poor-to-moderate (intraclass correlation coefficient: 0.35-0.76). A moderate agreement was found when testing all positively worded items against the recoded negatively worded items (intraclass correlation coefficient: 0.65). Internal consistency was 0.86 for the positively worded items and 0.76 for the negatively worded items.

Conclusions: Changing from positive to negative wording produced some differences in Swedish web-version of the Quality of Recovery item scores. Internal consistency was acceptable, but 2 items (not having a general feeling of well-being and not speaking normally) need further refinement.

sted, utgiver, år, opplag, sider
HOBOKEN NJ, USA: Wiley-Blackwell, 2017. Vol. 23, nr 3, s. 502-507
Emneord [en]
Evaluation, items, psychometric evaluation, questionnaire
HSV kategori
Forskningsprogram
Omvårdnadsvetenskap
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-51755DOI: 10.1111/jep.12639ISI: 000405212600005PubMedID: 27650792Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-84988349894OAI: oai:DiVA.org:oru-51755DiVA, id: diva2:954689
Tilgjengelig fra: 2016-08-23 Laget: 2016-08-23 Sist oppdatert: 2018-01-10bibliografisk kontrollert

Open Access i DiVA

Fulltekst mangler i DiVA

Andre lenker

Forlagets fulltekstPubMedScopus

Personposter BETA

Jaensson, MariaNilsson, Ulrica

Søk i DiVA

Av forfatter/redaktør
Jaensson, MariaNilsson, Ulrica
Av organisasjonen
I samme tidsskrift
Journal of Evaluation In Clinical Practice

Søk utenfor DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Totalt: 327 treff
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf