oru.sePublikationer
Ändra sökning
RefereraExporteraLänk till posten
Permanent länk

Direktlänk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Pressure-pain threshold algometric measurement in patients with greater trochanteric pain after total hip arthroplasty
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Sundsvall Hospital, Sundsvall, Sweden.
Department of Research and Development, Sundsvall Hospital, Sundsvall, Sweden .
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institute, Solna, Stockholm, Sweden.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Sundsvall Hospital, Sundsvall, Sweden; Department of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences, Norrland University Hospital, Umeå, Sweden .
2008 (Engelska)Ingår i: The Clinical Journal of Pain, ISSN 0749-8047, E-ISSN 1536-5409, Vol. 24, nr 3, s. 232-236Artikel i tidskrift (Refereegranskat) Published
Abstract [en]

Background: The evaluation of tenderness associated with greater trochanteric pain (GTP) syndrome is amenable to bias and depends on the examiner's experience. In this study, we tested whether the use of an electronic pressure algometer enhanced the reliability of this evaluation.

Patients and methods: Pressure-pain threshold (PPT) was measured with an electronic algometer in 18 patients who developed GTP after total hip arthroplasty and in matched controls. Both groups were evaluated with visual analog scale.

Results: The PPT measurements showed large interindividual variability across patients. The correspondence of the PPT measurements in asymptomatic patients was good. We found good validity for the algometer used. The PPT ratio of 0.8 (affected vs. unaffected side) can be used as a cut-off ratio. The PPT measurements at the greater trochanter (local pain) were significantly lower than at the ilio-tibial band (radiated pain). There was no correlation between PPT measurements and visual analog scales. Despite the acceptable sensitivity and specificity of pressure algometer, because of low positive predictive value and large interindividual variability, pressure algometer has a limited value as a screening test.

Conclusions: The examination of tenderness associated with GTP is facilitated by the used algometer. It is the intraindividual body-side PPT differences that yield the most sensitive measurement for the assessment of deep pain. A cut-off value of 0.8 can be used for diagnostic purposes. Interindividual differences might be considerable and could mask pathologic diagnostic findings.

Ort, förlag, år, upplaga, sidor
Philadelphia, USa: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2008. Vol. 24, nr 3, s. 232-236
Nyckelord [en]
Pressure algometer, pressure-pain threshold, deep pain sensitivity, VAS
Nationell ämneskategori
Medicin och hälsovetenskap Anestesi och intensivvård Neurovetenskaper
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-55774DOI: 10.1097/AJP.0b013e3181602159ISI: 000253708800008PubMedID: 18287829Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-43149114460OAI: oai:DiVA.org:oru-55774DiVA, id: diva2:1074559
Tillgänglig från: 2017-02-15 Skapad: 2017-02-15 Senast uppdaterad: 2018-01-13Bibliografiskt granskad

Open Access i DiVA

Fulltext saknas i DiVA

Övriga länkar

Förlagets fulltextPubMedScopus

Sök vidare i DiVA

Av författaren/redaktören
Wretenberg, Per
I samma tidskrift
The Clinical Journal of Pain
Medicin och hälsovetenskapAnestesi och intensivvårdNeurovetenskaper

Sök vidare utanför DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetricpoäng

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Totalt: 148 träffar
RefereraExporteraLänk till posten
Permanent länk

Direktlänk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf