Predictive ability of frailty scores in surgically managed patients with traumatic spinal injuries: a TQIP analysisVisa övriga samt affilieringar
2025 (Engelska)Ingår i: European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery, ISSN 1863-9933, E-ISSN 1863-9941, Vol. 51, nr 1, artikel-id 126Artikel i tidskrift (Refereegranskat) Published
Abstract [en]
PURPOSE: Frailty has gained recognition as a crucial determinant of patient outcomes following traumatic spinal injury (TSI), particularly due to its increasing incidence in elderly populations. The aim of the current investigation was therefore to compare the ability of several frailty scores to predict adverse outcomes in surgically managed isolated TSI patients without spinal cord injury.
METHODS: All adult patients (18 years or older) who suffered an isolated TSI due to blunt trauma, and required surgical management, were extracted from the 2013-2021 Trauma Quality Improvement Program database. The ability of the Orthopedic Frailty Score (OFS), the Hospital Frailty Risk Score (HFRS), the 11-factor (11-mFI) and 5-factor (5-mFI) modified frailty index, as well as the Johns Hopkins Frailty Indicator to predict adverse outcomes was compared based on the area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC). Subgroup analyses were also performed on patients who were ≥ 65 years old and those who were injured due to a ground-level fall (GLF).
RESULTS: A total of 39,449 patients were selected from the TQIP database. The 5-mFI and 11-mFI outperformed all other frailty scores when predicting in-hospital mortality (5-mFI AUC: 0.73) (11-mFI AUC: 0.73), any complication (5-mFI AUC: 0.65) (11-mFI AUC: 0.65), and FTR (5-mFI AUC: 0.75) (11-mFI AUC: 0.75). Among the 14,257 geriatric patients, however, the OFS demonstrated the highest predictive ability for in-hospital mortality (AUC: 0.65). The OFS (AUC: 0.64) also performed on the same level as both the 5-mFI (AUC: 0.63) and the 11-mFI (AUC: 0.63) when predicting FTR in this population. Among the 9616 patients who were injured due to a GLF, the OFS performed on par with the 5-mFI and 11-mFI when predicting in-hospital mortality and FTR.
CONCLUSION: Simpler scores like the 5-factor modified Frailty Index and Orthopedic Frailty Score outperform or perform on par with more complicated frailty scores when predicting mortality, complications, and failure-to-rescue in surgically managed isolated traumatic spinal injury patients without spinal cord injury, particularly among geriatric patients and those injured in a GLF.
Ort, förlag, år, upplaga, sidor
Urban und Vogel Medien und Medizin Verlagsgesellsc , 2025. Vol. 51, nr 1, artikel-id 126
Nyckelord [en]
Frailty, Hospital frailty risk score, Johns Hopkins frailty indicator, Modified frailty index, Morbidity, Mortality, Orthopedic frailty score, Traumatic spinal injury
Nationell ämneskategori
Geriatrik
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-119669DOI: 10.1007/s00068-025-02775-0ISI: 001439658700001PubMedID: 40035883OAI: oai:DiVA.org:oru-119669DiVA, id: diva2:1942760
Forskningsfinansiär
Örebro universitet2025-03-062025-03-062025-03-18Bibliografiskt granskad