oru.sePublikationer
Ändra sökning
RefereraExporteraLänk till posten
Permanent länk

Direktlänk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
En försumbar arena?: Organisationerna och remissväsendet 1964-2009
Örebro universitet, Institutionen för humaniora, utbildnings- och samhällsvetenskap. (Forskarskolan offentlig verksamhet i utveckling (FOVU))ORCID-id: 0000-0002-0627-1245
2012 (Svenska)Ingår i: Statsvetenskaplig Tidskrift, ISSN 0039-0747, Vol. 114, nr 1, s. 29-55Artikel i tidskrift (Refereegranskat) Published
Abstract [en]

This article investigates how the participation of voluntary organisations in the remiss-procedure has changed between 1964 and 2009 and how to interpret this. Drawing on evidence from 33 remiss-directories in nine different policy fields, the results conclude that the proportional level of voluntary organisations has declined and more organisations have chosen to abstain from participating in the remissprocedure. In addition, the number of conflict-oriented organisations has declined while the number of consensus-oriented organisations active in the output side of the political system has increased. It is argued that the result can be understood in relation to the changing mode of governance, new challenges presented by the welfare state and the rise of transnational organisations that seek influence in less formal arenas for policy making.

Ort, förlag, år, upplaga, sidor
2012. Vol. 114, nr 1, s. 29-55
Nyckelord [sv]
Civilsamhället, intresseorganisationer, remissväsendet, deltagande, policy, välfärdsstaten
Nationell ämneskategori
Statsvetenskap
Forskningsämne
Statskunskap
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-23404OAI: oai:DiVA.org:oru-23404DiVA, id: diva2:532843
Tillgänglig från: 2012-06-12 Skapad: 2012-06-12 Senast uppdaterad: 2017-12-07Bibliografiskt granskad
Ingår i avhandling
1. A pluralist state?: civil society organizations’ access to the Swedish policy process 1964-2009
Öppna denna publikation i ny flik eller fönster >>A pluralist state?: civil society organizations’ access to the Swedish policy process 1964-2009
2014 (Engelska)Doktorsavhandling, sammanläggning (Övrigt vetenskapligt)
Abstract [en]

Including civil society organizations in the policy process is a distinctive trait of democratic governance. But, while being highly valuable from a democratic point of view, not all civil society organizations are represented in the policy process. This dissertation draws attention to the role of the government in shaping the representation of civil society organizations in the Swedish government consultation referred to as the ‘remiss procedure’. The overall aim is to increase empirical and theoretical understanding of civil society organizations’ access to the national Swedish policy process. Drawing on various empirical data sources, it analyzes how access has changed during the second half of the 20th century, the factors influencing access, and the significance of the access provided by the government.

The results are based on four empirical studies, and show that the government has encouraged an increasing number and more diverse types of civil society organizations to be represented in the remiss procedure. In addition, organizations with plenty of resources, such as labor and business organizations, are not overrepresented. However, access is slightly skewed in favor of civil society organizations with an insider position within other access points at national government level, which is consistent with a privileged pluralistic pattern of interest representation. In addition, civil society organizations seem to be invited into an arena for political influence of less relevance. Theoretically, the dissertation moves beyond the neo-corporatist perspective that dominated Swedish research during the second half of the 20th century by drawing attention to five different theoretical lenses: pluralism, neo-corporatism, political opportunity structures, policy network theory, and resource exchange theory. It concludes that a variety of theories are needed for access to be understood.

Ort, förlag, år, upplaga, sidor
Örebro: Örebro universitet, 2014. s. 90
Serie
Örebro Studies in Political Science, ISSN 1650-1632 ; 38
Nyckelord
access, interest representation, civil society, neo-corporatism, pluralism, political opportunity structures, policy network, resource exchange, consultations, governmental commissions, remiss procedure, Sweden
Nationell ämneskategori
Globaliseringsstudier
Forskningsämne
Statskunskap
Identifikatorer
urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-38042 (URN)978-91-7529-046-1 (ISBN)
Disputation
2014-11-07, Hörsal P2, Prismahuset, Fakultetsgatan 1, Örebro, 10:15 (Svenska)
Opponent
Handledare
Tillgänglig från: 2014-10-24 Skapad: 2014-10-24 Senast uppdaterad: 2018-01-11Bibliografiskt granskad

Open Access i DiVA

Fulltext saknas i DiVA

Övriga länkar

Statsvetenskaplig tidskrifts arkiv

Personposter BETA

Lundberg, Erik

Sök vidare i DiVA

Av författaren/redaktören
Lundberg, Erik
Av organisationen
Institutionen för humaniora, utbildnings- och samhällsvetenskap
I samma tidskrift
Statsvetenskaplig Tidskrift
Statsvetenskap

Sök vidare utanför DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

urn-nbn

Altmetricpoäng

urn-nbn
Totalt: 56 träffar
RefereraExporteraLänk till posten
Permanent länk

Direktlänk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf