oru.sePublikationer
Ändra sökning
RefereraExporteraLänk till posten
Permanent länk

Direktlänk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
New ways to interview eyewitnesses of crime: a comparison between interviews done face-to-face, by telephone and via online chat
Örebro universitet, Institutionen för juridik, psykologi och socialt arbete. (CAPS - center for Criminological And PsychoSocial research)ORCID-id: 0000-0002-1576-5079
Örebro universitet, Institutionen för juridik, psykologi och socialt arbete. (CAPS - center for Criminological And PsychoSocial research)ORCID-id: 0000-0002-8163-6558
2014 (Engelska)Konferensbidrag, Enbart muntlig presentation (Övrigt vetenskapligt)
Abstract [en]

With new technology new possibilities emanate that can be cost and time effective. The present study examined the differences between face-to-face interrogation, telephone interrogation and chat interrogation when hearing witnesses of crime. The main purpose was to see if there were any differences in number of correct memories, number of incorrect memories and number of incorrect answers to misleading questions depending on method of interrogation used. The study involved a total of appr. 180 participants between ages 18 and 70 years (appr. 50% females and 50% males). Participants were randomly assigned to six different equally large groups: three groups watched a video of a violent crime and were then interrogated using one out of the three methods, face-to-face, by phone or by chat. The other three groups watched a video of a property crime and were then interrogated using one of the three interrogation methods. The analyses will focus on investigating whether there are any significant differences in number of correct memories, number of incorrect memories and number of incorrect answers to misleading questions depending on method of interrogation used. Practical implications for police work will be discussed.

Ort, förlag, år, upplaga, sidor
2014.
Nationell ämneskategori
Psykologi Juridik och samhälle
Forskningsämne
Psykologi; Kriminologi
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-40072OAI: oai:DiVA.org:oru-40072DiVA, id: diva2:775220
Konferens
The Stockholm Criminology Symposium, Stockholm, Sweden, June 9-11, 2014
Tillgänglig från: 2014-12-31 Skapad: 2014-12-31 Senast uppdaterad: 2017-10-17Bibliografiskt granskad

Open Access i DiVA

Fulltext saknas i DiVA

Personposter BETA

Doyle, MariaAndershed, Henrik

Sök vidare i DiVA

Av författaren/redaktören
Doyle, MariaAndershed, Henrik
Av organisationen
Institutionen för juridik, psykologi och socialt arbete
PsykologiJuridik och samhälle

Sök vidare utanför DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

urn-nbn

Altmetricpoäng

urn-nbn
Totalt: 698 träffar
RefereraExporteraLänk till posten
Permanent länk

Direktlänk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf