oru.sePublications
2122232425262724 of 125
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Qualifying Standpoints: Stance adverbs as a presentational device for managing the burden of proof
(Language and Rhetoric in Society)ORCID iD: 0000-0002-0295-4559
2009 (English)Doctoral thesis, monograph (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

A number of studies from pragmatics and discourse analysis have investigated the function of stance adverbs, such as clearly, fortunately, frankly, perhaps, and technically, when used to qualify utterances. Within the field of argumentation studies, scholars who have paid attention to these words have primarily focused on the so-called modal adverbs, and have not considered the insights that can be gained by treating the class of stance adverbs as the linguistic realisation of a certain move in an argumentative discussion. This study aims to fill this gap by investigating the strategic function of stance adverbs when qualifying an utterance that functions as a standpoint. In this study, stance adverbs are examined as a presentational device at the arguer’s disposal when putting forward a standpoint. The study is comprised of three parts. In the first part, the question ‘What is a qualified standpoint?’ is answered by combining illocutionary analysis of the move of advancing a standpoint with pragma-linguistic study of stance ad­verbs. In the second part, the question ‘Why would the protagonist qualify the standpoint?’ is answered based on the concept of burden of proof, which is es­sential to the move of advancing a standpoint. In the third part, the question ‘How does standpoint qualification function strategically in an argumentative discussion?’ is answered by postulating that the protagonist of a qualified standpoint is interested in managing the burden of proof, an assumption which builds on the results of the other two parts. The book is of interest to advanced students and scholars of argumentation and communication studies as well as those interested in an explanation of language use from an argumentative perspective.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Utrecht, Netherlands: LOT , 2009. , p. 215
Series
LOT Dissertation Series ; 233
National Category
Other Humanities not elsewhere specified Communication Studies
Research subject
Rhetoric
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-70182ISBN: 978-94-6093-005-8 (print)OAI: oai:DiVA.org:oru-70182DiVA, id: diva2:1263594
Public defence
2009-10-28, 08:10 (English)
Supervisors
Available from: 2018-11-16 Created: 2018-11-16 Last updated: 2018-11-16Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

Qualifying Standpoints: Stance adverbs as a presentational device for managing the burden of proof(1659 kB)13 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 1659 kBChecksum SHA-512
ff2562ea63a94110054a27f3733cd2179029755c7488859013af51ab405b7c9e5b0ad8eb71240c82827157afa90689a710cccce1b9df36b881efac85197bcf90
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Authority records BETA

Tseronis, Assimakis

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Tseronis, Assimakis
Other Humanities not elsewhere specifiedCommunication Studies

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 13 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

isbn
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

isbn
urn-nbn
Total: 11 hits
2122232425262724 of 125
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf