oru.sePublications
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Selecting Software Component Sourcing Options: Detailed Survey Description and Analysis
RISE Research Institutes of Sweden AB, Lund, Sweden.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7879-4371
Örebro University, Örebro University School of Business. Blekinge Institute of Technology, Karlskrona, Sweden.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-0311-1502
Blekinge Institute of Technology, Karlskrona, Sweden.
Blekinge Institute of Technology, Karlskrona, Sweden.
Show others and affiliations
2018 (English)Report (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

Component-based software engineering (CBSE) is a common approach to develop and evolve contemporary software systems. When evolving a system based on components, make-or-buy decisions are frequent, i.e., whether to develop components internally or to acquire them fromexternal sources. In CBSE, several different sourcing options are available: 1) developing software in-house, 2) outsourcing development, 3) buying commercial-off-the-shelf software, and 4) integrating open source software components. Unfortunately, there is little available research on howorganizations select component sourcing options (CSO) in industry practice. In this work, we seek to contribute empirical evidence to CSO selection. Method: We conduct a cross-domain survey on CSO selection in industry, implemented as an online questionnaire. Based on 188 responses, we find that most organizations consider multiple CSOs during software evolution, and that the CSO decisions in industry are dominated by expert judgment. When choosing between candidate components, functional suitability acts as an initial filter, then reliability is the most important quality. We stress that future solution-oriented work on decision support has to account for the dominance of expert judgment in industry. Moreover, we identify considerable variation in CSO decision processes in industry. Finally, we encourage software development organizations to reflect on their decision processes when choosing whether to make or buy components, and we recommend using our survey for a first benchmarking.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2018. , p. 36
Series
RISE Report ; 2018:71
Keywords [en]
Component-based software engineering, sourcing, software architecture, decision making, survey
National Category
Software Engineering
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-72566ISBN: 978-91-88907-15-8 (electronic)OAI: oai:DiVA.org:oru-72566DiVA, id: diva2:1306398
Projects
Orion
Funder
Knowledge Foundation, 20140218Available from: 2019-04-23 Created: 2019-04-23 Last updated: 2019-06-18Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

Selecting Software Component Sourcing Options: Detailed Survey Description and Analysis(1989 kB)53 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 1989 kBChecksum SHA-512
3e41a1c7a1f23fedeca1ec44742c134d9d502bde70fc21a1ac70b51aabc5eef4b1511b59483815fdde72227c651fa3b5cf321410b4eb1536a68dcb7f65e425d5
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Authority records BETA

Borg, MarkusChatzipetrou, PanagiotaPapatheocharous, EfiAxelsson, Jakob

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Borg, MarkusChatzipetrou, PanagiotaPapatheocharous, EfiAxelsson, Jakob
By organisation
Örebro University School of Business
Software Engineering

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 53 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

isbn
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

isbn
urn-nbn
Total: 68 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf