oru.sePublikationer
Ändra sökning
RefereraExporteraLänk till posten
Permanent länk

Direktlänk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Phylogenetic microbiota profiling in fecal samples depends on combination of sequencing depth and choice of NGS analysis method
Örebro universitet, Institutionen för medicinska vetenskaper.
Örebro universitet, Institutionen för medicinska vetenskaper.ORCID-id: 0000-0003-3887-9519
Örebro universitet, Institutionen för medicinska vetenskaper.ORCID-id: 0000-0002-0362-0008
Örebro universitet, Institutionen för medicinska vetenskaper.ORCID-id: 0000-0002-8391-1576
Visa övriga samt affilieringar
2019 (Engelska)Ingår i: PLoS ONE, ISSN 1932-6203, E-ISSN 1932-6203, Vol. 14, nr 9, artikel-id e0222171Artikel i tidskrift (Refereegranskat) Published
Abstract [en]

The human gut microbiota is well established as an important factor in health and disease. Fecal sample microbiota are often analyzed as a proxy for gut microbiota, and characterized with respect to their composition profiles. Modern approaches employ whole genome shotgun next-generation sequencing as the basis for these analyses. Sequencing depth as well as choice of next-generation sequencing data analysis method constitute two main interacting methodological factors for such an approach. In this study, we used 200 million sequence read pairs from one fecal sample for comparing different taxonomy classification methods, using default and custom-made reference databases, at different sequencing depths. A mock community data set with known composition was used for validating the classification methods. Results suggest that sequencing beyond 60 million read pairs does not seem to improve classification. The phylogeny prediction pattern, when using the default databases and the consensus database, appeared to be similar for all three methods. Moreover, these methods predicted rather different species. We conclude that the choice of sequencing depth and classification method has important implications for taxonomy composition prediction. A multi-method-consensus approach for robust gut microbiota NGS analysis is recommended.

Ort, förlag, år, upplaga, sidor
PLOS , 2019. Vol. 14, nr 9, artikel-id e0222171
Nationell ämneskategori
Bioinformatik och systembiologi
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-76641DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0222171PubMedID: 31527871OAI: oai:DiVA.org:oru-76641DiVA, id: diva2:1353747
Tillgänglig från: 2019-09-24 Skapad: 2019-09-24 Senast uppdaterad: 2019-12-20Bibliografiskt granskad

Open Access i DiVA

Fulltext saknas i DiVA

Övriga länkar

Förlagets fulltextPubMed

Personposter BETA

Rajan, Sukithar K.Lindqvist, Carl MårtenBrummer, Robert JanSchoultz, IdaRepsilber, Dirk

Sök vidare i DiVA

Av författaren/redaktören
Rajan, Sukithar K.Lindqvist, Carl MårtenBrummer, Robert JanSchoultz, IdaRepsilber, Dirk
Av organisationen
Institutionen för medicinska vetenskaper
I samma tidskrift
PLoS ONE
Bioinformatik och systembiologi

Sök vidare utanför DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetricpoäng

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Totalt: 92 träffar
RefereraExporteraLänk till posten
Permanent länk

Direktlänk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf