oru.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Global interlaboratory assessments of perfluoroalkyl substances under the Stockholm Convention on persistent organic pollutants
Örebro University, School of Science and Technology. (MTM Research Centre)ORCID iD: 0000-0003-1496-9245
Vrije Universiteit, Environment & Health, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Vrije Universiteit, Environment & Health, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
2020 (English)In: TrAC. Trends in analytical chemistry, ISSN 0165-9936, E-ISSN 1879-3142, Vol. 124, article id 115459Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

The Global Monitoring Plan (GMP) according to article 16 of the Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants (POPs) requires that POP laboratories must be capable – at any time – to analyse samples for POPs within a variation of ±25%. Based on this target error of 25%, a statistical model using z-scores was applied to assess the performance of analytical laboratories for POPs and a number of matrices. Since the second round of these ‘Bi-ennial Global Interlaboratory Assessment on Persistent Organic Pollutants (POPs)’, carried out in 2012/2013, perfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) have been included into the proficiency tests. The third round was carried out in 2016/2017. The test materials included test solutions of PFASs analytical standards, the abiotic matrices sediment, air (extract) and water and the biotic matrices fish, human milk and human plasma. The number of laboratories submitting results for PFASs remained quite stable (IL2 = 27 laboratories; IL3 = 29), but there was broader geographic distribution observed in IL3: in addition to the laboratories from Asia and the Western Europe/other groups, two laboratories from Africa participated, two from Central-Eastern Europe and one from the Latin American/Caribbean region.

Considering that PFASs were introduced for the first time in round 2, the results were good to reasonable compared to those of a number of other POPs included in the same study. However, it shall also be mentioned that for some matrices and PFASs, the number of laboratories submitting results was too small and the results too scattered to derive a consensus value. This was especially true for the PFOS precursor compounds and the air matrix. Also, laboratories struggle with the analysis of the branched PFOS isomers.

These interlaboratory assessments on PFASs gave promising results and demonstrated the importance of proficiency tests in an international environment to generate trust in laboratory results. The need to participate regularly in such intercomparison assessments is highlighted. The results show the current level of PFAS analysis, which varies by laboratory and by matrix rather than per geographic region.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier, 2020. Vol. 124, article id 115459
Keywords [en]
Global monitoring plan, Interlaboratory assessment, LC/MS methods, Perfluoroalkyl substances, Stockholm convention, Geographical distribution, Isomers, Laboratories, Matrix algebra, Monitoring, Global monitoring, Stockholm, Organic pollutants
National Category
Environmental Sciences Analytical Chemistry
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-79699DOI: 10.1016/j.trac.2019.03.023ISI: 000518368000016Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85064387010OAI: oai:DiVA.org:oru-79699DiVA, id: diva2:1390820
Note

Funding Agency:

Global Environment Facility (GEF) 

Available from: 2020-02-03 Created: 2020-02-03 Last updated: 2020-03-26Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records BETA

Fiedler, H.

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Fiedler, H.
By organisation
School of Science and Technology
In the same journal
TrAC. Trends in analytical chemistry
Environmental SciencesAnalytical Chemistry

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 21 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf