To Örebro University

oru.seÖrebro University Publications
System disruptions
We are currently experiencing disruptions on the search portals due to high traffic. We are working to resolve the issue, you may temporarily encounter an error message.
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Political failure: a missing piece in innovation policy analysis
Örebro University, Örebro University School of Business. Research Institute of Industrial Economics (IFN), Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-9173-8347
Centre for Family Entrepreneurship and Ownership (CeFEO), Jönköping International Business School, Jönköping, Sweden.
Örebro University, Örebro University School of Business. Centre for Family Entrepreneurship and Ownership (CeFEO), Jönköping International Business School, Jönköping, Sweden.
Independent, Stockholm, Sweden.
2023 (English)In: Economics of Innovation and New Technology, ISSN 1043-8599, E-ISSN 1476-8364, Vol. 32, no 7, p. 1037-1068Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Within the field of innovation studies, researchers have identified systematic failures that hamper investment in R&D, innovation, and growth. Accordingly, researchers in this field often seek to provide policy recommendations on how to alleviate these failures. However, previous discussions have often been lacking considerations to the risks of political failures, meaning that policies fail to achieve their stated goals in a systematic manner. In response to this gap, this article aims to illustrate the concept of political failure and its relevance for innovation research. This is done by both discussing how political failure can impact innovation policy and by reviewing the prevalence of any discussions of political failure among top-ranked journals on innovation for the period 2010-2019, a total of 7161 articles. The results show that consideration of political failure is scarce, with a small number of papers that have a substantial analysis of political failures. If the awareness of political failures could be increased, this could lead to better policy recommendations with a more nuanced discussion of the risks and limitations of public policy.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Taylor & Francis, 2023. Vol. 32, no 7, p. 1037-1068
Keywords [en]
Innovation policy, political economy, political failure, market failure, public choice
National Category
Economics
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-99197DOI: 10.1080/10438599.2022.2070843ISI: 000795195600001Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85130372214OAI: oai:DiVA.org:oru-99197DiVA, id: diva2:1661887
Funder
The Jan Wallander and Tom Hedelius Foundation, P2018-0162Available from: 2022-05-30 Created: 2022-05-30 Last updated: 2023-12-04Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Kärnä, AndersEngberg, Erik

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Kärnä, AndersEngberg, Erik
By organisation
Örebro University School of Business
In the same journal
Economics of Innovation and New Technology
Economics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 54 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf