To Örebro University

oru.seÖrebro University Publications
System disruptions
We are currently experiencing disruptions on the search portals due to high traffic. We are working to resolve the issue, you may temporarily encounter an error message.
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Collective action by community groups: solutions for climate change or different players in the same game?
RAND Corporation, Boston MA, USA.
RAND Corporation, Santa Monica CA, USA.
Institute of International Relations, The University of the West Indies, St. Augustine, Trinidad and Tobago.
Institute for Risk & Disaster Reduction and Institute for Global Health, University College London, London, UK; College of Earth, Ocean, and Atmospheric Sciences, Oregon State University, Oregon, USA.
Show others and affiliations
2023 (English)In: Climate and Development, ISSN 1756-5529, E-ISSN 1756-5537, Vol. 15, no 8, p. 679-691Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Community groups are taking initiatives to adapt to a changing climate. These organizations differ from businesses and governments by being non-profit, often informal, resource limited, and reliant on volunteer labor. How these organizations facilitate collective action is not well known, especially since they do not necessarily solve common pool resource governance, but rather improve common pool resources through collective action. In fact, at first glance, community groups seem to not have the means for solving collective action problems used routinely in industry and government, such as paying people for cooperation or punishing them for lack of it.This article investigates how community groups solve collective action problems though data gathered across 25 organizations in three sites - Sitka, Alaska, USA; Toco, Trinidad; and a global site of distributed citizen science organizations. We found that community groups used positive reinforcement methods common to industry and used little punishment. Groups also engaged in mechanisms for collective action, such as relying on altruistic contributions by few individuals, that generally are not considered commonplace in businesses and governments. We conclude by discussing implications from this study for collective action theory and for how policymakers might learn from community groups to address climate change.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Taylor & Francis, 2023. Vol. 15, no 8, p. 679-691
Keywords [en]
Collective action, community resilience, prisoner's dilemma, snowdrift, game theory, punishment, ethnicity, volunteerism, climate change adaptation
National Category
Human Geography
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-110927DOI: 10.1080/17565529.2022.2149254ISI: 000943505100001Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85150344497OAI: oai:DiVA.org:oru-110927DiVA, id: diva2:1830210
Funder
The Research Council of Norway, 312046
Note

This work was supported by NSF: [Grant Number 2028065]; Research Council of Norway: [Grant Number 312046]; National Environment Research Council (UK): [Grant Number NE/T013656/1].

Available from: 2024-01-22 Created: 2024-01-22 Last updated: 2024-01-23Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Meriläinen, Eija

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Meriläinen, EijaKelman, Ilan
In the same journal
Climate and Development
Human Geography

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 37 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf