Media exposure to climate change information and pro-environmental behavior: the role of climate change risk judgment
2024 (English)In: BMC Psychology, E-ISSN 2050-7283, Vol. 12, no 1, article id 262Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to examine the relationships between exposure to climate change information in traditional and modern media, cognitive and emotional aspects of climate change risk judgment, and pro-environmental behavior (PEB).
METHOD: A cross-sectional online study was conducted on a quota sample of 1,075 participants (51.9% women) aged 18-79 years. Participants self-reported their exposure to climate change-related information in traditional (e.g. television) and modern media (e.g. social networks), cognitive assessment of climate change risk, level of worry about climate change, and the frequency of PEB.
RESULTS: Structural equation modeling showed a good fit for the parallel mediation model, involving cognitive risk judgment and worry as mediators between exposure to climate change information in traditional and modern media and PEB. Exposure to climate change information in traditional media had indirect effect on PEB through heightened worry, but not cognitive risk judgment. In contrast, exposure to climate change information in modern media had no indirect effect on PEB.
CONCLUSION: Since the link between exposure to climate change information in traditional media and PEB has been shown to be mediated by climate change worry, it is important to enhance the coverage of climate change in traditional media in Croatia, taking care to offer solutions to reduce possible negative impact on people's well-being.
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
BioMed Central (BMC), 2024. Vol. 12, no 1, article id 262
Keywords [en]
Climate change risk judgment, Media, Pro-environmental behavior, Worry
National Category
Media and Communications Psychology (excluding Applied Psychology)
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-113687DOI: 10.1186/s40359-024-01771-0ISI: 001219693100001PubMedID: 38734671Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85192930162OAI: oai:DiVA.org:oru-113687DiVA, id: diva2:1859252
Note
This work was financed by the Catholic University of Croatia.
2024-05-212024-05-212024-05-24Bibliographically approved