Reversal treatment and clinical outcomes in acute intracranial haemorrhage associated with oral anticoagulant use: protocol of a planned systematic review and meta-analysisShow others and affiliations
2025 (English)In: BMJ Open, E-ISSN 2044-6055, Vol. 15, no 2, article id e090357
Article, review/survey (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]
INTRODUCTION: Reversal treatment is commonly used for managing oral anticoagulant (OAC)-associated intracranial haemorrhages. Its effects on mortality are still understudied, particularly in various subtypes of intracranial haemorrhages. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to synthesise the available data to study the impact of reversal therapies on mortality following various OAC-associated acute intracranial haemorrhages.
METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This protocol follows the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Protocols, and the final review will be reported in accordance with the PRISMA reporting guidelines. This systematic review and meta-analysis will include studies that assess contemporary reversal treatment in comparison to no reversal treatment, in cases of OAC-associated intracranial haemorrhage. Stratification will be performed for the types of bleeding as well as OAC at bleeding onset. Preliminary searches to determine search term inclusions were conducted in May-August 2024 in the electronic databases Embase, PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science without language and publication date restrictions. Randomised controlled studies, non-randomised controlled trials, and observational studies will be considered for the final meta-analysis. Three reviewers (MT, JOS and AB) will screen titles and abstracts, and one reviewer (MT) will subsequently conduct full-text screening. Risks of bias will be assessed by MT using tools such as Risk of Bias 2, Risk Of Bias In Non-randomised Studies - of Interventions and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Heterogeneity among the study results will be assessed using the I² statistic. If appropriate, a random-effects meta-analysis model will be performed. Subgroup analyses and meta-regression (if applicable) will be performed to assess sources of heterogeneity among (1) intracranial haemorrhage types, (2) OAC drugs and (3) study types, with randomised controlled trials being the primary focus.
ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval is not needed as this project involves previously published data. We intend to publish the results in a peer-reviewed journal.
PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42024556420.
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
BMJ Publishing Group Ltd, 2025. Vol. 15, no 2, article id e090357
Keywords [en]
Intracerebral Haemorrhage, NEUROLOGY, NEUROSURGERY
National Category
Neurology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-119362DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-090357ISI: 001425453700001PubMedID: 39965957OAI: oai:DiVA.org:oru-119362DiVA, id: diva2:1938678
Note
Study protocol
Funding Agencies:
This work was supported by funds from the Swedish Stroke Foundation and grants provided by the Swedish state according to the ‘Avtal om Läkarutbildning och Forskning agreement’ (ALF grants).
2025-02-192025-02-192025-03-04Bibliographically approved