oru.sePublikationer
Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
An economic evaluation of the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) multisite implementation program for colorectal surgery in Alberta
Institute of Health Economics, Edmonton, Alta, Canada.
Institute of Health Economics, Edmonton, Alta, Canada.
Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Alta, Canada.
Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Alta, Canada.
Show others and affiliations
2016 (English)In: Canadian journal of surgery, ISSN 0008-428X, E-ISSN 1488-2310, Vol. 59, no 6, 6716Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background: In February 2013, Alberta Health Services established an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) implementation program for adopting the ERAS Society colorectal guidelines into 6 sites (initial phase) that perform more than 75% of all colorectal surgeries in the province. We conducted an economic evaluation of this initiative to not only determine its cost-effectiveness, but also to inform strategy for the spread and scale of ERAS to other surgical protocols and sites.

Methods: We assessed the impact of ERAS on patients' health services utilization (HSU; length of stay [LOS], readmissions, emergency department visits, general practitioner and specialist visits) within 30 days of discharge by comparing pre- and post-ERAS groups using multilevel negative binomial regressions. We estimated the net health care costs/savings and the return on investment (ROI) associated with those impacts for post-ERAS patients using a decision analytic modelling technique.

Results: We included 331 pre- and 1295 post-ERAS patients in our analyses. ERAS was associated with a reduction in all HSU outcomes except visits to specialists. However, only the reduction in primary LOS was significant. The net health system savings were estimated at $2 290 000 (range $1 191 000-$3 391 000), or $1768 (range $920-$2619) per patient. The probability for the program to be cost-saving was 73%-83%. In terms of ROI, every $1 invested in ERAS would bring $3.8 (range $2.4-$5.1) in return.

Conclusion: The initial phase of ERAS implementation for colorectal surgery in Alberta is cost-saving. The total savings has the potential to be more substantial when ERAS is spread for other surgical protocols and across additional sites.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Ottowa, Canada: Canadian Medical Association , 2016. Vol. 59, no 6, 6716
National Category
Health Care Service and Management, Health Policy and Services and Health Economy
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-52729DOI: 10.1503/cjs.006716PubMedID: 27669402OAI: oai:DiVA.org:oru-52729DiVA: diva2:1033072
Available from: 2016-10-05 Created: 2016-10-03 Last updated: 2016-12-06Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Ljungqvist, Olle
By organisation
School of Medical Sciences
In the same journal
Canadian journal of surgery
Health Care Service and Management, Health Policy and Services and Health Economy

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

Altmetric score

Total: 36 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link