oru.sePublikationer
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
The Use Of Things As Data And Aesthetic Governmentality
Örebro University, School of Humanities, Education and Social Sciences, Örebro University, Sweden.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8173-7474
2016 (English)Conference paper, Abstract (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

International comparisons have become central to education governance in Europe and globally; however, they are not just a contemporary phenomenon. On the contrary, governing by comparison in education is historically as deep-rooted as the founding of the European nation-states themselves. When it comes to education the earliest modern examples of systematic comparisons of education and learning outcomes are the late 19th century World fairs’ educational exhibitions (Dittrich 2010, Lundahl & Lawn 2014 Sobe & Boven 2014, Lundahl 2016). One important function of international comparisons today as well as from a historical perspective, is to use it for various forms of accountability. Today we often understand accountability as measures, league tables, and formal responsibilities. However, the late 19th century seems to present us with a different view on accountability. In this aspect we are inspired by Ghertner´s (2010, 2011) concept aesthetic governmentality, as well as Simmel’s notion of exhibitions as (crowded) spaces pushing forward a competition of aesthetics ideals (1998). In this paper we will especially focus on what was considered learning outcomes, during the early phase of international comparison that started with the World fairs and national exhibitions such as school museums in late 19th C. For this we use archive material that we have found in our earlier research on World fairs (e.g. Lundahl & Lawn 2014, Landahl 2014). We have also investigated objects displayed at the early 20th C national school museum. For instance we have traced accounts on learning outcomes in the shape of handicraft (sloyd), gymnastics drill exhibits, drawings, pupils writings etc.

References

Ghertner, A. (2010). Calculating without numers: aesthetic governmentality in Delhi's slums. Economy and Society, 39,2, 185-217.Lundahl, C., & Lawn, M. (2014). The Swedish schoolhouse: a case study in transnational influences in education at the 1870s world fairs. Paedagogica Historica, (ahead-of-print), 1-16.Sobe, N. W., & Boven, D. T. (2014). Nineteenth-Century World’s Fairs as Accountability Systems: Scopic Systems, Audit Practices and Educational Data. Education policy analysis archives, 22, 118.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2016.
National Category
Pedagogy
Research subject
Education
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-53745OAI: oai:DiVA.org:oru-53745DiVA: diva2:1051840
Conference
European Conference on Educational Research (ECER 2016), Dublin, Ireland, August 22-26, 2016
Projects
From Paris to PISA
Funder
Swedish Research Council
Available from: 2016-12-04 Created: 2016-12-04 Last updated: 2016-12-05Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Abstract

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Lundahl, Christian
By organisation
School of Humanities, Education and Social Sciences, Örebro University, Sweden
Pedagogy

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

Total: 84 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf