oru.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Physical education teaching as a caring act: techniques of bodily touch and the paradox of caring
Department of Education, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden. (SMED)ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0579-4201
Örebro University, School of Health Sciences. (SMED, RISPA)
School of Education, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg VA, USA.
2018 (English)In: Sport, Education and Society, ISSN 1357-3322, E-ISSN 1470-1243, Vol. 23, no 6, p. 591-606Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

In this article, we investigate “no touch policies” as a practical teacher concern that includes the body as a location, a source, and a means in educational activity. We argue that to understand issues regarding physical touch within school practice we must conceive it as deeply associated with specific teaching techniques. Thus, the didactical challenge is not found in argumentations about the pro and cons of physical touch, but through analysis of how teachers handle student interaction and teaching intentions.

We consider teaching as a caring profession. Caring, as a practical teacher concern, requires wisdom regarding the right time to use bodily touch and to refrain from such use. This wisdom involves the ability to discern people’s needs, desires, interests, and purposes in particular situations and act appropriately. From a body pedagogical perspective we approach intergenerational touch not only as a discursive and power related question but as an essential tension in the intersection of the; ambiguity attendant to any intentional act such as teaching, the conflict between the ethics of care and the ethics of justice, and finally, the paradox of caring.

We draw on interviews with PE-teachers in Swedish primary, secondary, and upper-secondary schools and analyses of a collection of techniques of bodily touch that are established and practiced with specific pedagogical purposes. The results shows PE teacher’s competence in handling different functions of intergenerational touch in relation to three different techniques of bodily touch; 1) Security touch, which is characterized by intentions to handle the fragile; 2) Denoting touch, which is characterized by intentions to handle learning content; 3) Relational touch, which is characterized by caring intentions. Each of these is of importance for the teachers in carrying out their call to teach and each of these relies on professional assessments whether or not it meets its intended purpose.

 

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Routledge, 2018. Vol. 23, no 6, p. 591-606
Keyword [en]
Caring, body pedagogics, corporeal realism, non-touch, technique, teaching intention
National Category
Sport and Fitness Sciences
Research subject
Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-55284DOI: 10.1080/13573322.2016.1244765ISI: 000433325800006Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-84992741059OAI: oai:DiVA.org:oru-55284DiVA, id: diva2:1071053
Projects
Pedagogical consequences of no touching in Physical Education
Funder
Swedish National Centre for Research in Sports
Available from: 2017-02-02 Created: 2017-02-02 Last updated: 2018-06-15Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records BETA

Andersson, JoacimÖhman, Marie

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Andersson, JoacimÖhman, Marie
By organisation
School of Health Sciences
In the same journal
Sport, Education and Society
Sport and Fitness Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 204 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf