To Örebro University

oru.seÖrebro University Publications
System disruptions
We are currently experiencing disruptions on the search portals due to high traffic. We are working to resolve the issue, you may temporarily encounter an error message.
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
The Relation Between the Bifactor Model of the Youth Psychopathic Traits Inventory and Conduct Problems in Adolescence: Variations Across Gender, Ethnic Background, and Age
Department of Clinical Child and Adolescent Studies, Leiden University, Leiden, Netherlands .
Utrecht Centre for Child and Adolescent Studies, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Department of Clinical Child and Adolescent Studies, Leiden University, Leiden, Netherlands.
Örebro University, School of Law, Psychology and Social Work.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-8163-6558
Show others and affiliations
2017 (English)In: Psychological Assessment, ISSN 1040-3590, E-ISSN 1939-134X, Vol. 29, no 8, p. 1065-1070Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

The current study examines how the bifactor model of the Youth Psychopathic Traits Inventory (YPI) is related to conduct problems in a sample of Dutch adolescents (N = 2,874; 43% female). It addresses to what extent the YPI dimensions explain variance over and above a General Psychopathy factor (i.e., one factor related to all items) and how the general factor and dimensional factors are related to conduct problems. Group differences in these relations for gender, ethnic background, and age were examined. Results showed that the general factor is most important, but dimensions explain variance over and above the general factor. The general factor, and Affective and Lifestyle dimensions, of the YPI were positively related to conduct problems, whereas the Interpersonal dimension was not, after taking the general factor into account. However, across gender, ethnic background, and age, different dimensions were related to conduct problems over and above the general factor. This suggests that all 3 dimensions should be assessed when examining the psychopathy construct.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
American Psychological Association (APA), 2017. Vol. 29, no 8, p. 1065-1070
Keywords [en]
Adolescents, Bifactor model, Dimensionality, Psychopathic traits, Youth Psychopathic Traits Inventory
National Category
Psychology (excluding Applied Psychology)
Research subject
Criminology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-55618DOI: 10.1037/pas0000407ISI: 000407201500011PubMedID: 27893226Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85001018490OAI: oai:DiVA.org:oru-55618DiVA, id: diva2:1073575
Available from: 2017-02-11 Created: 2017-02-11 Last updated: 2018-09-16Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Andershed, Henrik
By organisation
School of Law, Psychology and Social Work
In the same journal
Psychological Assessment
Psychology (excluding Applied Psychology)

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 520 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf