oru.sePublikationer
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Considerations for appointing an external examiner of a PhD in the biomedical sciences in Sweden: a questionnaire-based survey
Orebro University Hospital. Division of Clinical Chemistry, Dept of Laboratory Medicine.
Division of Clinical Chemistry, Dept of Laboratory Medicine, Örebro University Hospital (USÖ), Örebro, Sweden; Dept of Medical Biosciences/Clinical Chemistry, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
2014 (English)In: The Scientist (Philadelphia, Pa.), ISSN 0138-9130, E-ISSN 1588-2861, Vol. 98, no 3, 2039-2049 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

A survey of 170 Swedish mentors of PhD-students found that expertise in the research field and avoidance of conflict of interest were big motivators for finding an examiner from abroad for PhD theses. The survey also identified that concern by supervisors for facilitating the career paths of younger scientists in terms of introductions to potential labs for post-doctoral work and obtaining high quality neutral review of one's research was also important, as was the desire to set up collaborations. An expectation from the management of one's university of the PR-value of a foreign senior person as examiner also played a part. Although few were willing to admit that PR for one's own group was a motivating factor. A small fraction of responders expressed concern that, as some of the costs of the PhD-examination were being shifted on to the research groups themselves, this might impact the current situation. Language also played a subordinate role. To get the best out of the visiting examiner, it was important to educate and instruct them in their role in a Swedish PhD-examination protocol. Male supervisors had had more PhD-candidates than female, but they also had used more Sweden-based examiners than their female colleagues. We conclude that using a foreign examiner was motivated by factors that are likely to prevail for the foreseeable future. This Swedish practice may also provide a template for a common standard.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Springer, 2014. Vol. 98, no 3, 2039-2049 p.
Keyword [en]
PhD process, Cross-border collaboration, Academic stringency, Conflict of interest, PR, Gender issues, Questionnaire
National Category
Computer and Information Science
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-56347DOI: 10.1007/s11192-013-1150-1ISI: 000331559800028ScopusID: 2-s2.0-84897573714OAI: oai:DiVA.org:oru-56347DiVA: diva2:1081800
Available from: 2017-03-15 Created: 2017-03-15 Last updated: 2017-03-15Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Breimer, Lars H.
By organisation
Orebro University Hospital
In the same journal
The Scientist (Philadelphia, Pa.)
Computer and Information Science

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

Altmetric score

Total: 2 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf