oru.sePublikationer
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Do patient and ward-related characteristics influence the use of coercive measures?: Results from the EUNOMIA international study
Charles Univ Prague, Dept Psychiat, Med Sch 1, Prague, Czech Republic..
Charles Univ Prague, Dept Psychiat, Med Sch 1, Prague, Czech Republic..
Charles Univ Prague, Dept Psychiat, Med Sch 1, Prague, Czech Republic..
Univ Naples Federico II, Dept Psychiat, Naples, Italy..
Show others and affiliations
2014 (English)In: Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, ISSN 0933-7954, E-ISSN 1433-9285, Vol. 49, no 10, 1619-1629 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

This study aims to identify whether selected patient and ward-related factors are associated with the use of coercive measures. Data were collected as part of the EUNOMIA international collaborative study on the use of coercive measures in ten European countries.

Involuntarily admitted patients (N = 2,027) were divided into two groups. The first group (N = 770) included patients that had been subject to at least one of these coercive measures during hospitalization: restraint, and/or seclusion, and/or forced medication; the other group (N = 1,257) included patients who had not received any coercive measure during hospitalization. To identify predictors of use of coercive measures, both patients' sociodemographic and clinical characteristics and centre-related characteristics were tested in a multivariate logistic regression model, controlled for countries' effect.

The frequency of the use of coercive measures varied significantly across countries, being higher in Poland, Italy and Greece. Patients who received coercive measures were more frequently male and with a diagnosis of psychotic disorder (F20-F29). According to the regression model, patients with higher levels of psychotic and hostility symptoms, and of perceived coercion had a higher risk to be coerced at admission. Controlling for countries' effect, the risk of being coerced was higher in Poland. Patients' sociodemographic characteristics and ward-related factors were not identifying as possible predictors because they did not enter the model.

The use of coercive measures varied significantly in the participating countries. Clinical factors, such as high levels of psychotic symptoms and high levels of perceived coercion at admission were associated with the use of coercive measures, when controlling for countries' effect. These factors should be taken into consideration by programs aimed at reducing the use of coercive measures in psychiatric wards.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Springer, 2014. Vol. 49, no 10, 1619-1629 p.
Keyword [en]
Coercion, Physical restraint, Involuntary commitment, International aspects
National Category
Psychiatry
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-56514DOI: 10.1007/s00127-014-0872-6ISI: 000342228400014PubMedID: 24737189ScopusID: 2-s2.0-84919431184OAI: oai:DiVA.org:oru-56514DiVA: diva2:1082580
Note

Funding Agency:

European Commission  QLG4-CT-2002-01036

Available from: 2017-03-17 Created: 2017-03-17 Last updated: 2017-03-17Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Cervilla, Jorge A.Giacco, DomenicoKjellin, Lars
By organisation
Orebro University Hospital
In the same journal
Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
Psychiatry

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

Altmetric score

CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf