oru.sePublikationer
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Initial experiences with the enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS (R)) protocol in open radical cystectomy
Orebro Univ Hosp, Dept Urol, SE-70185 Orebro, Sweden..
Orebro University Hospital. Dept Urol.
Orebro University Hospital. Dept Urol.
Orebro University Hospital. Dept Urol.
Show others and affiliations
2015 (English)In: Scandinavian journal of urology, ISSN 2168-1805, E-ISSN 2168-1813, Vol. 49, no 4, 302-307 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Objective. This article describes the authors' experiences with the implementation of the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS (R)) protocol for open radical cystectomy (ORC). Adherence to the ERAS cystectomy protocol was assessed; secondary outcome measures were impact on perioperative complication rate (Clavien-Dindo classification), time to first defecation, postoperative length of stay and hospital readmission rate. Materials and methods. This retrospective feasibility study compared outcomes with patients in a historical control group. The study group (ERAS) consisted of 31 consecutive patients undergoing ORC and urinary diversion during 1 year from 1 January to 31 December 2011. The control group (pre-ERAS) comprised 39 consecutive patients operated on during 2010. Follow-up was 30 days. Results. There were no significant demographic differences between the two groups, and no differences in complications graded Clavien III or above, or in total length of stay. The ERAS group had statistically significantly shorter mean time to first passage of stool and statistically significantly lower readmission frequency than the pre-ERAS group. The number of patients was small and the study was not randomized; moreover, the use of historical controls inevitably introduced different types of bias. Conclusions. Introduction of the ERAS protocol is clearly feasible in cystectomy, and may improve clinical outcomes in terms of faster return of bowel function and reduction of readmission within 30 days. However, more and larger studies are needed to prove the efficacy of ERAS for patients undergoing ORC.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2015. Vol. 49, no 4, 302-307 p.
Keyword [en]
bladder cancer, Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS (R)), open radical cystectomy, protocol
National Category
Urology and Nephrology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-56560DOI: 10.3109/21681805.2015.1004641ISI: 000359170200006PubMedID: 25660105OAI: oai:DiVA.org:oru-56560DiVA: diva2:1082787
Available from: 2017-03-17 Created: 2017-03-17 Last updated: 2017-03-17Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Carringer, MalcolmAndren, OveAndersson, Swen-OlofCarlsson, JessicaLjungqvist, Olle
By organisation
Orebro University Hospital
In the same journal
Scandinavian journal of urology
Urology and Nephrology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

Altmetric score

Total: 6 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf