oru.sePublikationer
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Evaluation of polymerase chain reaction assays for the diagnosis of Trichomonas vaginalis infection in Russia
DO Ott Res Inst Obstet & Gynaecol, Microbiol Lab, St Petersburg, Russia..
DO Ott Res Inst Obstet & Gynaecol, Microbiol Lab, St Petersburg, Russia..
Ctr Dis Control & Prevent CDC, Lab Reference, Atlanta, GA USA.;Ctr Dis Control & Prevent CDC, Res Branch, Div STD Prevent, Atlanta, GA USA..
Ctr Dis Control & Prevent CDC, Lab Reference, Atlanta, GA USA.;Ctr Dis Control & Prevent CDC, Res Branch, Div STD Prevent, Atlanta, GA USA..
Show others and affiliations
2013 (English)In: Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology, ISSN 0926-9959, E-ISSN 1468-3083, Vol. 27, no 2, E217-E223 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background In Russia, the microscopy- and culture-based diagnostics of trichomoniasis is mainly suboptimal. Recent years, domestically produced diagnostic PCR assays have been implemented; however, any evaluation of these PCRs has never been internationally reported. Objective To assess the performance characteristics of PCR assays developed and currently used in Russia to detect Trichomonas vaginalis. Materials and methods Five PCR assays were assessed on 448 samples (317 vaginal and 131 male urethral) collected from symptomatic attendees of youth centres (n = 415) and patients of a dermatovenereological dispensary that were previously diagnosed with trichomoniasis (n = 33). As reference assay, a sensitive and specific real-time multiplex PCR was used. Results T. vaginalis DNA was detected in five (all females) of the 415 patients of youth centres (1.2%). All 33 patients previously diagnosed at the venereological dispensary proved to be true positive. For 445 (99.3%) of these 448 samples identical results were obtained by all PCRs, 35 positive and 410 negative. The three discordant samples were positive in all PCRs except one conventional PCR assay. The sensitivities of the PCRs were 94.3-100% and 66.7-100% for vaginal and urethral swabs, respectively. All evaluated assays were 100% specific. The detection limits of the different PCRs ranged from 0.1 to 5 genome equivalents per reaction. Conclusion The PCR assays currently used in Russia for the detection of T. vaginalis have in general high sensitivities and excellent specificities for both vaginal samples and urethral samples from males. Received: 3 October 2011; Accepted: 3 May 2012

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Wiley-Blackwell, 2013. Vol. 27, no 2, E217-E223 p.
National Category
Dermatology and Venereal Diseases
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-56744DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-3083.2012.04593.xISI: 000313883900013PubMedID: 22672184OAI: oai:DiVA.org:oru-56744DiVA: diva2:1083963
Available from: 2017-03-23 Created: 2017-03-23 Last updated: 2017-03-23Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Unemo, M.
By organisation
Orebro University Hospital
In the same journal
Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology
Dermatology and Venereal Diseases

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

Altmetric score

CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf