oru.sePublikationer
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Adoption of management accounting innovations: Organizational culture compatibility and perceived outcomes
University of Gothenburg, School of Business, Economics and Law, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Örebro University, Örebro University School of Business.
2017 (English)In: Management Accounting Research, ISSN 1044-5005, E-ISSN 1096-1224, Vol. 34, 59-74 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Although the introduction of a number of successful management accounting innovations over the past few decades has generated a vast amount of research, we have limited knowledge about how the diffusion of innovations is affected by the interplay between characteristics of adopters and characteristics of innovations. The study presented in this paper contributes to the literature that examines the adoption of innovations at the firm level of analysis. We develop and test an adoption model which draws on two recently introduced ideas about innovation adoption the notion of compatibility between organizational culture and the values and beliefs embedded in innovations, and the perspective that early and late adopters might both be motivated to adopt based on expected economic and social gains and losses. In synthesising these models, we assume that a diffusing innovation that is compatible with a firm's values and beliefs is adopted early if it is perceived as delivering adequate gains while the innovation is rejected if it is not perceived as doing so, and that a diffusing innovation that is incompatible with a firm's values and beliefs is adopted late if it is perceived as reducing the likelihood of incurring losses while the innovation is rejected if it is perceived as not doing so. Hypotheses are generated and tested using data provided by a web-based survey of Swedish manufacturing firms on the diffusion of the balanced scorecard across those firms. In most respects, the pattern of results this study finds supports our model and assumptions.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2017. Vol. 34, 59-74 p.
Keyword [en]
Management accounting innovations, Diffusion, Adoption, Organizational culture, Balanced scorecard, New-institutional theory
National Category
Economics and Business
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-57075DOI: 10.1016/j.mar.2016.07.007ISI: 000395354200005Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-84998885583OAI: oai:DiVA.org:oru-57075DiVA: diva2:1088947
Note

Funding Agencies:

Jan Wallanders and Tom Hedelius Foundation

Riksbankens Jubileumsfond - The Swedish Foundation for Humanities and Social Sciences

Available from: 2017-04-18 Created: 2017-04-18 Last updated: 2017-10-18Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Greve, Jan
By organisation
Örebro University School of Business
In the same journal
Management Accounting Research
Economics and Business

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

Altmetric score

Total: 146 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf