oru.sePublikationer
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
The legitimacy and implications of inspection in social services organisations in Sweden
Örebro University, School of Law, Psychology and Social Work, Örebro University, Sweden.
(English)Manuscript (preprint) (Other academic)
National Category
Social Work
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-57799OAI: oai:DiVA.org:oru-57799DiVA: diva2:1098111
Available from: 2017-05-23 Created: 2017-05-23 Last updated: 2017-06-13Bibliographically approved
In thesis
1. Tillsyn i teori och praktik: om statlig styrning och kontroll av socialtjänstens individ- och familjeomsorg
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Tillsyn i teori och praktik: om statlig styrning och kontroll av socialtjänstens individ- och familjeomsorg
2017 (Swedish)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

The aim of this thesis is to deepen the understanding about the function of control in the inspection process and to increase the knowledge about the legitimacy and impact from inspection on different types of social and welfare services. In the thesis the form and legitimacy of the inspection process are studied in two types of social services in Sweden: a less complex service where the task to investigate and make decisions about social care dominates (IAD), and a more complex service where the task to provide treatment interventions dominates (TI). The data consists of policy documents, inspection reports, casefile documentation, and interviews with inspectors, politicians, managers and social workers. The inspection process is discussed in relation to theories about control systems and legitimacy processes. Inspection is a policy instrument whose standards are derived from legislations and where those subject to the inspection are obliged to meet the demands made by the inspectorates. This form of disciplinary control has been questioned given that its complexity makes it hard to regulate the practice of social work through detailed rules. By including a less disciplinary form of control the instrument’s ability to impact on more complex aspects of social services are expected to increase. The results show a difference in how the inspection process is set up in the two types of services. In the IAD services the process takes the form of a disciplinary control system, whereas the process in TI services initially takes the form of a non-disciplinary system. In spite of the differences observed in the initial stages of the process, the results show that the judgments of inspectors in both types of services are almost exclusively based on information about concrete and detailed aspects. This entails that the judgements of inspectors in both types of services mostly take the form of statements on simple observable and concrete conditions, whereas judgments about more complex aspects are rarely made. The study also shows that although the propriety and relevance of the inspectors’ judgements are questioned more in TI organisations inspections seem to have greater validity and impact on TI than on IAD organisations. The results of the thesis point to two explanations. One explanation is that the costs of dealing with the problems underlying the identified deficiencies are lower for TI than IAD organisations. This in turn leads to greater acceptance of carrying out the proposed measures in TI than in IAD organisations. Another possible explanation is that the potential sanctions are greater for TI than IAD organisations.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Örebro: Örebro University, 2017. 93 p.
Series
Örebro Studies in Social work, ISSN 1651-145X ; 21
Keyword
Inspection, control, social services, standards, evaluation, judgment, legitimacy, adaption, impact
National Category
Social Work
Research subject
Social Work
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-57154 (URN)978-91-7529-196-3 (ISBN)
Public defence
2017-06-16, Örebro universitet, Långhuset, Hörsal 2, Fakultetsgatan 1, Örebro, 10:15 (Swedish)
Opponent
Supervisors
Available from: 2017-04-21 Created: 2017-04-21 Last updated: 2017-06-13Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Hämberg, Eva
By organisation
School of Law, Psychology and Social Work, Örebro University, Sweden
Social Work

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

Total: 10 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf