To Örebro University

oru.seÖrebro University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Self-admission to inpatient treatment in psychiatry: lessons on implementation
Stockholm Centre for Eating Disorders, Stockholm, Sweden; Centre for Psychiatry Research, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Örebro University, School of Medical Sciences. Stockholm Centre for Eating Disorders, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-1460-4238
Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Psychiatry, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill NC, United States; Department of Nutrition, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill NC, United States.
Stockholm Centre for Eating Disorders, Stockholm, Sweden; Centre for Psychiatry Research, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
2017 (English)In: BMC Psychiatry, E-ISSN 1471-244X, Vol. 17, article id 343Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background: Interest has increased in programs offering self-admission to inpatient treatment for patients with severe psychiatric illness, whereby patients who are well-known to a service are afforded the opportunity to admit themselves at will for a brief period of time. The aim of the present study was to examine patient experiences of practical considerations during the start-up phase of a self-admission program in an eating disorder service.

Methods: Sixteen adult participants in a self-admission program at a specialist eating disorders service were interviewed at 6 months about their experiences during the implementation phase. A qualitative content analysis approach was applied in order to identify recurring themes.

Results: Six subcategories regarding implementation and logistics of self-admission were identified: "Start-up problems", "Problems associated with reserving a bed", "Lack of staff continuity", "Not enough emphasis on long-term goals", "Too demanding in terms of freedom and responsibility", and "Suggestions for alternative models".

Conclusions: Practical recommendations can be offered for the implementation of future self-admission programs, such as thoroughly informing all participants about the rationale behind self-admission with particular emphasis on patient accountability, establishing a waiting list procedure for occasions when all designated beds are occupied, and assigning an individual contact staff member responsible for each self-admitted patient.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
BioMed Central, 2017. Vol. 17, article id 343
Keywords [en]
Psychiatry, Inpatients, Patient admissions, Patient participation, Voluntary admissions
National Category
Psychiatry
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-61927DOI: 10.1186/s12888-017-1505-xISI: 000412678000004PubMedID: 29017471Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85030836611OAI: oai:DiVA.org:oru-61927DiVA, id: diva2:1152303
Note

Funding Agencies:

Värkstadsstiftelsen  

Psykiatrifonden  

Available from: 2017-10-24 Created: 2017-10-24 Last updated: 2024-01-17Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Gustafsson, Sanna Aila

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Gustafsson, Sanna Aila
By organisation
School of Medical Sciences
In the same journal
BMC Psychiatry
Psychiatry

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 145 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf