oru.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Brist på kollegialt inflytande urholkar lojalitet med chef och organisation… men inte med patienterna
Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Psychology, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.
Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Psychology,Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-1233-6268
2014 (Swedish)In: Läkartidningen, ISSN 0023-7205, E-ISSN 1652-7518, Vol. 111, no 12-13, p. 553-556Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

The aim of the investigation was to examine relations between physicians’ experiences of opportunities to exert their competence, and have arenas for collegially influence on the organization’s activities and loyalty, protest and exit. In total, 1 400 physicians participated in a questionnaire study. Strong feelings of loyalty with the organization, workplace and immediate supervisor were 2–3 times more common among those with arenas, than those without the experience of an arena. Loyalty with their profession and patients was high, and independent of access to such arenas. Of those with high access to arenas, 87% reported that their viewpoints on work conditions were taken into consideration, compared to 21% of those with low access. Considerations for changes in profession, employer or workplace were twice as common among those with low access to arenas. In conclusion, employers who want to attract physicians must have arenas where the physicians’ competence can influence the organisational activities.

Abstract [sv]

I en enkätstudie undersöktes relationen mellan läkares uppfattning om kollegialt inflytande och lojalitet, protest och sorti.

Stark lojalitet med organisation och chef är 2–3 gånger vanligare bland dem som har stor tillgång till arenor för kollegialt inflytande. Lojaliteten med profession och patienter är stark och oberoende av tillgång till arenor.

Bland dem som har stor tillgång till arenor anser 87 procent att de får gehör för synpunkter jämfört med 21 procent bland dem med liten tillgång. 

Överväganden om att byta yrke, arbetsgivare eller arbetsplats är dubbelt så vanliga vid liten tillgång till arenor.

Arbetsgivare som vill attrahera läkare måste ha arenor där läkarna får inflytande över verksamheten.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Stockholm: Swedish Medical Association , 2014. Vol. 111, no 12-13, p. 553-556
National Category
Applied Psychology
Research subject
Psychology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-62659Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-84906555401OAI: oai:DiVA.org:oru-62659DiVA, id: diva2:1158034
Funder
AFA InsuranceAvailable from: 2017-11-17 Created: 2017-11-17 Last updated: 2018-06-25Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Scopus

Authority records BETA

Bejerot, Eva

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Bejerot, Eva
In the same journal
Läkartidningen
Applied Psychology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 27 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf