oru.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Long-term results of early myoelectric prosthesis fittings: A prospective case-control study
Örebro University, School of Health Sciences. (REAL)
Örebro University, School of Health Sciences. (REAL)
Örebro University Hospital. Örebro University, School of Health Sciences. Department of Prosthetics and Orthotics. (REAL)ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4247-2236
2017 (English)In: Prosthetics and orthotics international, ISSN 0309-3646, E-ISSN 1746-1553Article in journal (Refereed) Epub ahead of print
Abstract [en]

BACKGROUND: Different recommendations exist regarding what age is best for first-time fitting of myoelectric hand prostheses in children.

OBJECTIVES: To compare prosthetic skill, prosthetic use and risk for rejection over time between children fitted with myoelectric hand prostheses before or after 2½ years of age.

STUDY DESIGN: Prospective case-control design.

METHODS: The cases were nine children fitted with myoelectric hand prostheses before the age of 2½ years, whereas the controls were 27 children who were fitted with myoelectric hand prostheses after the age of 2½ years. The Skills Index Ranking Scale was used to classify prosthetic skill, and prosthetic use was categorised based on wearing time and pattern. Independent samples tests were used to compare data between groups. To estimate and compare the risk of prosthesis rejection between groups and over time, survival analysis was used.

RESULTS: Cases showed prosthetic skill early, but controls had caught up by the age of 3½ years. Cases had a significant ( p = 0.046) decrease in prosthetic use at the age of 9 years. In the long term, cases had a higher percentage of prosthesis rejection.

CONCLUSIONS: Considering young children's development of prosthetic skill and prosthetic use over time, this study shows no additional advantages from fitting a myoelectric hand prosthesis before 2½ years of age. Clinical relevance Children may be fitted with myoelectric hand prostheses to assist in daily tasks and to prevent future over-use problems. Most children fitted with myoelectric hand prostheses before 4 years of age become regular users. No advantages of fitting myoelectric hand prostheses before 2½ years of age were observed.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
London, United Kingdom: Sage Publications, 2017.
Keywords [en]
Children, fitting time, limb deficiency, myoelectric prosthesis
National Category
Medical and Health Sciences Other Health Sciences
Research subject
Occupational therapy; Medicine
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-63815DOI: 10.1177/0309364617729922PubMedID: 28905686OAI: oai:DiVA.org:oru-63815DiVA, id: diva2:1170611
Available from: 2018-01-04 Created: 2018-01-04 Last updated: 2018-02-02Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Authority records BETA

Sjöberg, LisLindner, Helen Y.Hermansson, Liselotte

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Sjöberg, LisLindner, Helen Y.Hermansson, Liselotte
By organisation
School of Health SciencesÖrebro University Hospital
In the same journal
Prosthetics and orthotics international
Medical and Health SciencesOther Health Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 57 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf