oru.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Ontological modelling of form and function for architectural design
Spatial Cognition Research Center (SFB/TR 8), University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany. (AASS)ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6290-5492
Spatial Cognition Research Center (SFB/TR 8), University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany.
Spatial Cognition Research Center (SFB/TR 8), University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany.
2012 (English)In: Applied Ontology, ISSN 1570-5838, E-ISSN 1875-8533, Vol. 7, no 3, p. 233-267Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Form, function and the relationship between the two serve a crucial role in design. Within architectural design, key aspects of the anticipated function of buildings, or of spatial environments in general, are supposed to be supported by their structural form, i.e., their shape, layout, or connectivity. Whereas the philosophy of form and function is a well-researched topic, the practical relations and dependencies between form and function are only known implicitly by designers and architects. Specifically, the formal modelling of structural forms and resulting artefactual functions within design and design assistance systems remains elusive.

In our work, we aim at making these definitions explicit by ontologically modelling respective domain entities, their properties and related constraints. We interpret "(structural) form" and "(artefactual) function" by specifying modular ontologies and their interplay for the architectural design domain. A key aspect in our modelling approach is the use of formal conceptual requirements and qualitative spatial calculi as a link between the structural form of a design and the differing functional capabilities that it affords or leads to. We demonstrate how our ontological modelling reflects types of architectural form and function, and how it facilitates the conceptual modelling of requirement constraints in architectural design.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
IOS Press, 2012. Vol. 7, no 3, p. 233-267
Keywords [en]
Ontology; architectural design; structure and function; modularity; qualitative spatial modelling; multi-perspective semantics
National Category
Computer Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-64252DOI: 10.3233/AO-2012-0104ISI: 000310495900001Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-84866952078OAI: oai:DiVA.org:oru-64252DiVA, id: diva2:1174468
Note

Funding Agencies:

German Research Foundation (DFG) through the Transregional Collaborative Research Center Spatial Cognition  SFB/TR 8 

Alexander von Humboldt Stiftung, Germany 

Available from: 2018-01-15 Created: 2018-01-15 Last updated: 2018-01-23Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records BETA

Bhatt, Mehul

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Bhatt, Mehul
In the same journal
Applied Ontology
Computer Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 37 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf