oru.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Black Cat, White Cat: The Identity of the WTO Judges
IFN, Stockholm, Sweden..ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1445-7699
Columbia & Neuchatel Orebro Univ, Stockholm, Sweden.;IFN Inst Ind Econ, Stockholm, Sweden..
2015 (English)In: Journal of World Trade, ISSN 1011-6702, E-ISSN 2210-2795, Vol. 49, no 4, p. 685-698Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

World Trade Organization (WTO) judges are proposed by the WTO Secretariat and elected to act as 'judges' if either approved by the parties to a dispute, or, by the WTO Director-General in case no agreement between the parties has been possible. They are typically 'Geneva crowd', that is, they are either current or former delegates representing their country before the WTO. This observation holds for both first as well as second instance WTO judges (e.g., Panellists and members of the Appellate Body). In that, the WTO evidences an attitude strikingly similar to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT). Whereas the legal regime has been heavily 'legalized', the people called to enforce it remain the same.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Kluwer Law International, 2015. Vol. 49, no 4, p. 685-698
National Category
Economics Law and Society
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-65322ISI: 000369123500006Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-84939546487OAI: oai:DiVA.org:oru-65322DiVA, id: diva2:1186459
Available from: 2018-02-28 Created: 2018-02-28 Last updated: 2018-02-28Bibliographically approved
In thesis
1. Settling disputes at the World Trade Organization
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Settling disputes at the World Trade Organization
2018 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

This cumulative dissertation consists of five self-contained essays, all of which are closely focused around issues that concern the WTO dispute settlement mechanism (DSM). In Essay 1, we describe salient features of the DSM using a unique data set. We observe a spike in new disputes in 2012, which in turn led to an increasing number of panels and appeals. This put the WTO under a heavy workload and delays soon became an issue. In Essay 2, we show that the DSM often appoint institutional insiders to serve as judges. Although the DSM was reformed under the WTO, the judges are similar to those found in the GATT. Furthermore, there is an incentive structure in place that encourage the WTO Secretariat to assume a larger role in writing panel reports and for panelists to let them. Essay 3 examines the role of Special and Differential Treatment (SDT) provision Art. 8.10 of the Dispute Settlement Understanding (DSU) in helping developing countries win disputes against richer countries. We observe that developing countries lose more claims when this provision is applied. I formulate a model and show that this observation can be consistent with the presumed benefit of Art. 8.10. Essay 4 addresses the problem of delays by asking ourselves whether we can lessen the problem with a permanent panel. I study features such as the panelists’ experience and prior working relationships in explaining the time it takes to issue panel reports and efficiency in examining claims. We find that prior collaboration can decrease duration. Lastly, in Essay 5, we assess the impact on trade for members that are not involved in disputes. There is evidence of positive trade effects after a dispute for noncomplainants, but the effects are limited to disputes that did not escalate to adjudication. We found no external dispute effects for adjudicated disputes.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Örebro: Örebro University, 2018. p. 34
Series
Örebro Studies in Economics, ISSN 1651-8896 ; 38
Keywords
World Trade Organization, trade policy, trade disputes, dispute settlement, causality, panels, developing countries, panels, international trade
National Category
Economics
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-64709 (URN)978-91-7529-233-5 (ISBN)
Public defence
2018-03-23, Örebro universitet, Teknikhuset, Hörsal T, Fakultetsgatan 1, Örebro, 10:00 (English)
Opponent
Supervisors
Available from: 2018-01-31 Created: 2018-01-31 Last updated: 2018-03-06Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Scopus

Authority records BETA

Johannesson, Louise

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Johannesson, Louise
In the same journal
Journal of World Trade
EconomicsLaw and Society

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 35 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf