oru.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
The Effect of Panel Composition on Developing Countries’ Success Rate in the WTO Dispute Settlement
Örebro University, Örebro University School of Business. Research Institute of Industrial Economics (IFN), Stockholm.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1445-7699
2016 (English)Report (Other academic)
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2016. , p. 30
National Category
Economics
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-65323OAI: oai:DiVA.org:oru-65323DiVA, id: diva2:1186469
Available from: 2018-02-28 Created: 2018-02-28 Last updated: 2018-02-28Bibliographically approved
In thesis
1. Settling disputes at the World Trade Organization
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Settling disputes at the World Trade Organization
2018 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

This cumulative dissertation consists of five self-contained essays, all of which are closely focused around issues that concern the WTO dispute settlement mechanism (DSM). In Essay 1, we describe salient features of the DSM using a unique data set. We observe a spike in new disputes in 2012, which in turn led to an increasing number of panels and appeals. This put the WTO under a heavy workload and delays soon became an issue. In Essay 2, we show that the DSM often appoint institutional insiders to serve as judges. Although the DSM was reformed under the WTO, the judges are similar to those found in the GATT. Furthermore, there is an incentive structure in place that encourage the WTO Secretariat to assume a larger role in writing panel reports and for panelists to let them. Essay 3 examines the role of Special and Differential Treatment (SDT) provision Art. 8.10 of the Dispute Settlement Understanding (DSU) in helping developing countries win disputes against richer countries. We observe that developing countries lose more claims when this provision is applied. I formulate a model and show that this observation can be consistent with the presumed benefit of Art. 8.10. Essay 4 addresses the problem of delays by asking ourselves whether we can lessen the problem with a permanent panel. I study features such as the panelists’ experience and prior working relationships in explaining the time it takes to issue panel reports and efficiency in examining claims. We find that prior collaboration can decrease duration. Lastly, in Essay 5, we assess the impact on trade for members that are not involved in disputes. There is evidence of positive trade effects after a dispute for noncomplainants, but the effects are limited to disputes that did not escalate to adjudication. We found no external dispute effects for adjudicated disputes.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Örebro: Örebro University, 2018. p. 34
Series
Örebro Studies in Economics, ISSN 1651-8896 ; 38
Keyword
World Trade Organization, trade policy, trade disputes, dispute settlement, causality, panels, developing countries, panels, international trade
National Category
Economics
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-64709 (URN)978-91-7529-233-5 (ISBN)
Public defence
2018-03-23, Örebro universitet, Teknikhuset, Hörsal T, Fakultetsgatan 1, Örebro, 10:00 (English)
Opponent
Supervisors
Available from: 2018-01-31 Created: 2018-01-31 Last updated: 2018-03-06Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Authority records BETA

Johannesson, Louise

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Johannesson, Louise
By organisation
Örebro University School of Business
Economics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 35 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf