oru.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Office type in relation to health, well-being, and job satisfaction among employees: Erratum
Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-7987-1567
Division of Intervention and Implementation Research, Department of Public Health Sciences, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
2010 (English)In: Environment and Behavior, ISSN 0013-9165, E-ISSN 1552-390X, Vol. 42, no 6, p. 887-887Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Reports an error in "Office type in relation to health, well-being, and job satisfaction among employees" by Christina Bodin Danielsson and Lennart Bodin (Environment and Behavior, 2008[Sep], Vol 40[5], 636-668). In the original article, a symbol was missing from Table 7 on p. 654. In that table, an open circle ("o") should have been present to show that the odds ratio indicated low risk for having poor quality of sleep among those who worked in the flex office. The corrected table is present in the erratum. (The following abstract of the original article appeared in record 2008-12036-003). This article investigates the hypothesis that office type has an influence on workers' health status and job satisfaction and 469 employees in seven different types, defined by their unique setup of architectural and functional features, have rated their health status and job satisfaction. Multivariate regression models were used for analysis of these outcomes, with adjustment for age, gender, job rank, and line of business. Both health status and job satisfaction differed between the seven office types. Lowest health status was found in medium-sized and small open plan offices. Best health was among employees in cell offices and flex offices. Workers in these types of offices and in shared room offices also rated the highest job satisfaction. Lowest job satisfaction was in combi offices, followed by medium-sized open plan offices. The differences between employees could possibly be ascribed to variations in architectural and functional features of the office types. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved)

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Sage Publications, 2010. Vol. 42, no 6, p. 887-887
National Category
Health Care Service and Management, Health Policy and Services and Health Economy Psychology (excluding Applied Psychology)
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-66084DOI: 10.1177/0013916510382750ISI: 000283263800009Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-78049291906OAI: oai:DiVA.org:oru-66084DiVA, id: diva2:1193269
Available from: 2018-03-26 Created: 2018-03-26 Last updated: 2018-05-02Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records BETA

Bodin, Lennart

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Bodin Danielsson, ChristinaBodin, Lennart
In the same journal
Environment and Behavior
Health Care Service and Management, Health Policy and Services and Health EconomyPsychology (excluding Applied Psychology)

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 8 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf