To Örebro University

oru.seÖrebro University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Incremental prognostic value of multichamber deformation imaging and renal function status to predict adverse outcome in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction
Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Department of Ultrasonography, Shenzhen Hospital, Southern Medical University, Shenzhen, China; Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
St. Francis Hospital, Roslyn NY, United States.
Fortis Hospitals, Bangalore, India.
Show others and affiliations
2018 (English)In: Echocardiography, ISSN 0742-2822, E-ISSN 1540-8175, Vol. 35, no 4, p. 450-458Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Aims: Deformation imaging, particularly of left-sided heart, is fast becoming an essential tool in clinical cardiology. However, data are scant regarding the value of biventricular and bi-atrial deformation in association with comorbidities in heart failure with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (HFREF).

Methods and Results: Forty-nine subjects (72 +/- 13years; 28 male) with HFREF and 14 age-matched controls underwent deformation imaging including LV global longitudinal strain (LVGLS%), right ventricular strain (RVS%), and left atrial reservoir strain (LARS%). Standard echo parameters included LVEF%, E/E ratio, and pulmonary artery systolic pressure (PASP). Mean +/- SD of LVEF, LVGLS%, and RVS% were 31% +/- 8%, 7% +/- 3%, and 17% +/- 7%, respectively, and were significantly lower compared with controls (all P < .0001). Over a follow-up period of 4.2years, 24% of patients died and 48% had a composite outcome of death and heart failure hospitalization. In the logistic regression model, taking the composite of death and heart failure hospitalization as a dichotomous variable, RVS%, E/E ratio, and PASP were the only significant univariate predictors of adverse outcome (R-2 = .68, all P < .05). In the multivariate model, however, only PASP predicted adverse outcome. PASP also had the largest AUC (0.8) in the ROC analysis. A creatinine level of >88 mu mol/L (SCREAT) and a cutoff value of LA reservoir strain (LARS %) at <16.7% provided the best sensitivity (86%) and specificity (40%) with an odds ratio of 3.8. In the Kaplan-Meier survival estimate, LARS%-SCREAT predicted all-cause mortality and HF hospitalization.

Conclusion: Multichamber deformation imaging along with renal function and PASP could best predict adverse outcome in HFREF.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
John Wiley & Sons, 2018. Vol. 35, no 4, p. 450-458
Keywords [en]
four-chamber strain, heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, left atrial strain, left ventricular strain, right atrial strain, right ventricular strain
National Category
Cardiac and Cardiovascular Systems
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-66899DOI: 10.1111/echo.13821ISI: 000430491300004PubMedID: 29399878Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85041598154OAI: oai:DiVA.org:oru-66899DiVA, id: diva2:1204432
Available from: 2018-05-08 Created: 2018-05-08 Last updated: 2020-12-01Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Kiotsekoglou, Anatoli

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Kiotsekoglou, Anatoli
By organisation
Örebro University HospitalSchool of Medical Sciences
In the same journal
Echocardiography
Cardiac and Cardiovascular Systems

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 108 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf