A meta-analysis of the incidence of complications associated with groin access after the use of resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta in trauma patients.Show others and affiliations
2018 (English)In: Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, ISSN 2163-0755, E-ISSN 2163-0763, Vol. 85, no 3, p. 626-634Article, review/survey (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]
BACKGROUND: Serious complications related to groin access have been reported with the use of resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA). We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to estimate the incidence of complications related to groin access from the use of REBOA in adult trauma patients.
METHODS: We identified articles in MEDLINE and EMBASE. We reviewed all studies that involved adult trauma patients that underwent the placement of a REBOA and included only those that reported the incidence of complications related to groin access. A meta-analysis of proportions was performed RESULTS: We 13 studies with a total of 424 patients. REBOA was inserted most commonly by trauma surgeons or emergency room physicians. Information regarding puncture technique was reported in 12 studies and was available for a total of 414 patients. Percutaneous access and surgical cutdown were performed in 304 (73.4%) and 110 (26.5%) patients respectively. Overall, complications related to groin access occurred in 5.6% of patients (n=24/424). Lower limb amputation was required in 2.1% of patients (9/424), of which three cases (3/424 [0.7%]) were directly related to the vascular puncture from the REBOA insertion. A meta-analysis which used the logit transformation showed a 5% (95% CI 3%-9%) incidence of complications without significant heterogeneity (LR test: χ2 = 0.73, p=0.2, Tau-square=0.2). In a second meta-analysis, we used the Freeman-Turkey double arcsine transformation and found an incidence of complications of 4% (95% CI 2%-7%) with low heterogeneity (I2 = 16.3%).
CONCLUSION: We found that the incidence of complications related to groin access was of four to five percent based on a meta-analysis of 13 studies published worldwide. Currently, there are no benchmarks or quality measures as a reference to compare, and thus, further work is required to identify these benchmarks and improve the practice of REBOA in trauma surgery.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis, Level III.
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2018. Vol. 85, no 3, p. 626-634
Keywords [en]
Wounds and injuries, REBOA, endovascular procedures, intraoperative complications, benchmarking
National Category
Surgery
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-67103DOI: 10.1097/TA.0000000000001978ISI: 000443539800027PubMedID: 29787536Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85052739748OAI: oai:DiVA.org:oru-67103DiVA, id: diva2:1211211
2018-05-302018-05-302023-07-04Bibliographically approved