To Örebro University

oru.seÖrebro University Publications
Planned maintenance
A system upgrade is planned for 10/12-2024, at 12:00-13:00. During this time DiVA will be unavailable.
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Characteristics of different risk factors and fasting plasma glucose for identifying GDM when using IADPSG criteria: a cross-sectional study
Örebro University hospital, Örebro, Sweden.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-1017-2124
Department of Women's and Children's health, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of medical health and sciences, Örebro University Hospital, Örebro, Sweden.
Örebro University, School of Medical Sciences. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of medical health and sciences, Örebro University Hospital, Örebro, Sweden; Macarthur Clinical School, Western Sydney University, Campbelltown, Australia.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0560-0761
Örebro University, School of Medical Sciences. Örebro University Hospital. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-2691-7525
2018 (English)In: BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, ISSN 1471-2393, E-ISSN 1471-2393, Vol. 18, no 1, article id 225Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

BACKGROUND: The Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare (SNBHW) recommended the new diagnostic criteria for GDM based upon Hyperglycaemia and Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes (HAPO) study thresholds. Due to limited knowledge base, no recommendations were made on GDM screening. The aim of this study is to evaluate test characteristics of risk factors and fasting blood glucose as screening tests for diagnosing GDM using diagnostic thresholds based upon HAPO study 1.75/2.0 (model I/II respectively) odds ratio for adverse pregnancy outcomes.

METHODS: This cross-sectional, population-based study included all pregnant women who attended maternal health care in Örebro County, Sweden between the years 1994-96. A 75 g OGTT with capillary fasting and 2-h blood glucose was offered to all pregnant women at week 28-32. Risk factors and repeated random glucose samples were collected. Sensitivity, specificity and predictive values of blood glucose were calculated.

RESULTS: Prevalence of GDM was 11.7% with model I and 7.2% with the model II criteria. Risk factors showed 28%, (95% CI 24-32) and 31%, (95% CI 25-37) sensitivity for model I and II respectively. A fasting cut off ≥4.8 mmol/l occurred in 24% of women with 91%, (95% CI 88-94) sensitivity and 85%, (95% CI 83-86) specificity using model I while a fasting cut off ≥5.0 mmol/l occurred in 14% with 91%, (95% CI 87-94) sensitivity and 92%, (95% CI 91-93) specificity using model II.

CONCLUSION: Risk factor screening for GDM was found to be poorly predictive of GDM but fasting glucose of 4.8-5.0 mmol/l showed good test characteristics irrespective of diagnostic model and results in a low rate of OGTTs.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
BioMed Central (BMC), 2018. Vol. 18, no 1, article id 225
Keywords [en]
Gestational diabetes mellitus, Screening, Fasting plasma glucose, Risk factors, Sensitivity
National Category
Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-67317DOI: 10.1186/s12884-018-1875-1ISI: 000435456900003PubMedID: 29898685Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85048591554OAI: oai:DiVA.org:oru-67317DiVA, id: diva2:1221100
Note

Funding Agency:

Research committee of Örebro County 

Available from: 2018-06-19 Created: 2018-06-19 Last updated: 2024-10-09Bibliographically approved
In thesis
1. Hyperglycaemia during pregnancy: The challenge of screening and deciding diagnostic criteria for gestational diabetes in Sweden
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Hyperglycaemia during pregnancy: The challenge of screening and deciding diagnostic criteria for gestational diabetes in Sweden
2023 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

Hyperglycaemia during pregnancy is one of the most common complicationsof pregnancy. In 2013, the World Health Organisation recommended diagnostic criteria (WHO-2013) for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), whichremains controversial due to an expected increase in prevalence, and the uncertainty as to the clinical relevance of treating these additional women or its cost-effectiveness.

Paper I involves a cross-sectional study of 4 918 pregnant women using riskfactor screening, which was poorly predictive of the WHO-2013 criteria, with an area under the curve of 40% (95% CI 24–32). In Paper II, a systematic review and meta-analysis of the prevalence of GDM according to the WHO2013 criteria in 136 705 women showed a 75% (RR 1.75, 95% CI 1.53-2.01) increased prevalence compared to the other GDM criteria. In Papers III-IV, a national stepped wedge cluster randomised controlled trial of 26 160 pregnancies before and 28 509 after the implementation of the WHO-2013 criteria across eight clusters during 2018 led to a 2.90 fold increase in GDM prevalence. No significant decrease was seen in the primary outcome, large for gestational age (LGA). There were, however, health benefits in secondary outcomes for the mother and neonate. There was a significant decrease in LGA dependent on the definition used, including the clinically used in Sweden (>2SD) with adjusted OR of 0.89 (95% CI 0.82-0.97). In Paper IV, the WHO2013 criteria led to increased resource use and incremental costs (€341.1 (195.9)) per pregnancy. The cost-effectiveness needs to be related to health benefits for the mother and/or neonate.

In conclusion, the current screening methods for GDM are in need of revision considering their poor predictive characteristics in finding GDM according to the WHO-2013 criteria. Implementing the WHO-2013 criteria in Sweden resulted in higher GDM prevalence with short-term increased resource use with uncertainty in costs savings and considerable healthcare benefits for the mother and neonate. This thesis provides evidence regarding the consequences of implementing the WHO-2013 criteria compared to former Swedish GDM criteria and may assist future decision-making.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Örebro: Örebro University, 2023. p. 96
Series
Örebro Studies in Medicine, ISSN 1652-4063 ; 281
Keywords
gestational diabetes mellitus, screening, prevalence, maternal and neonatal outcomes, health economic analysis
National Category
General Practice Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-105269 (URN)9789175295053 (ISBN)
Public defence
2023-06-16, Örebro universitet, Campus USÖ, Tidefeltsalen, Södra Grev Rosengatan 32, Örebro, 09:00 (English)
Opponent
Supervisors
Available from: 2023-03-30 Created: 2023-03-30 Last updated: 2024-10-09Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Saeedi, MaryamSimmons, DavidFadl, Helena

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Saeedi, MaryamSimmons, DavidFadl, Helena
By organisation
School of Medical SciencesÖrebro University Hospital
In the same journal
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 473 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf